BATSOEASY Cordless Jig Saw Compatible with Dewalt vs Makita XVJ04Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless
Updated August 2026 — Makita XVJ04Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless leads on lighting and power.
The Makita XVJ04Z offers superior performance and features, making it the better choice for serious users, while the BATSOEASY is a budget-friendly option for casual users.
Why BATSOEASY Cordless Jig Saw Compatible with Dewalt is better
Price
BATSOEASY is significantly cheaper at $39.99.
Battery Compatibility
Compatible with Dewalt 20V Max batteries.
Weight
Potentially lighter due to unspecified weight.
Why Makita XVJ04Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless is better
Performance
Makita delivers up to 3,000 SPM compared to 2,700 SPM.
Features
Includes soft no-load mode for precision cutting.
Brand Reputation
Makita has a higher sales rank and trusted brand status.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | BATSOEASY Cordless Jig Saw Compatible with Dewalt | Makita XVJ04Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Type | Brushless | Brushless |
| Bevel Cuts | ±45° | ±45° |
| Blade Change | Tool-free | Tool-free |
| LED Light | Yes | Yes |
| Variable Speed | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The BATSOEASY Cordless Jig Saw is priced at $39.99, making it significantly cheaper than the Makita XVJ04Z, which retails for $199.00. This places the Makita at about 400% higher than BATSOEASY. Such a price gap might attract budget-conscious users looking for a basic yet efficient cutting tool. However, the higher price of the Makita could reflect its advanced features and brand reputation. With the BATSOEASY, you can expect a solid entry-level jigsaw without the hefty investment, while the Makita may cater more to professionals and serious DIYers.
Features and Performance
When it comes to features, the Makita stands out with its advanced brushless motor delivering speeds of up to 3,000 strokes per minute, compared to the BATSOEASY's 2,700 SPM. This results in faster cutting, crucial for time-sensitive projects. Additionally, the Makita offers soft no-load mode which enhances precision at the start of cuts, a feature that the BATSOEASY lacks. While both tools come with adjustable orbital settings, the Makita's three settings plus straight cutting make it more versatile for a range of materials. Thus, for users seeking performance, the Makita may prove to be the better choice.
Design and Ergonomics
The BATSOEASY features an ergonomic, soft-grip handle which is designed for comfort during extended use, while the Makita includes a large two-finger variable speed trigger with a lock-on button for added convenience. Both tools are designed to minimize user fatigue, but the BATSOEASY’s focus on grip comfort might appeal more to casual users. The built-in LED light on the Makita enhances visibility during cutting operations, which is an important ergonomic feature for professional settings. Therefore, while both tools are user-focused, the Makita's advanced features may benefit those who work in more demanding environments.
Blade Change Mechanism
Both the BATSOEASY and the Makita offer tool-free blade change systems, which greatly enhance user convenience by allowing quick and efficient blade swaps without extra tools. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who frequently switch between different types of cuts or materials. The BATSOEASY’s durable all-metal blade clamp provides secure blade changes, while Makita's tool-less design also facilitates swift adjustments. While both tools excel in this area, the ease of use in changing blades could sway users towards either option depending on their specific needs.
Battery Compatibility
The BATSOEASY is compatible with various Dewalt 20V Max batteries, which may be advantageous for users already invested in that ecosystem. However, the Makita operates on the 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion battery system, recognized as one of the largest cordless tool systems available. This means that if you own other Makita tools, you can easily share batteries, enhancing versatility. The BATSOEASY’s compatibility is limited to Dewalt batteries, which could restrict users who do not already own Dewalt products. Thus, battery compatibility could be a deciding factor for consumers based on their existing tool collections.
Weight and Portability
The weight of both jigsaws is a crucial consideration for portability. While the BATSOEASY does not specify its weight, the Makita weighs in at a manageable 5.5 lbs. with the battery attached. This lightweight design is advantageous for users needing to transport their tools frequently or work at heights. The BATSOEASY, with its cordless design, also offers freedom of movement, but without a specified weight, its portability remains uncertain. If weight is a critical factor in your purchasing decision, the Makita’s clearly defined lightweight design gives it an edge.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
The Makita XVJ04Z has a sales rank of 47,253, significantly better than BATSOEASY’s rank of 169,418. This suggests that Makita is a more trusted brand among consumers, likely due to its long-standing reputation for quality and durability in the power tool market. A higher sales rank often correlates with customer satisfaction and brand loyalty, which could influence a buyer’s decision. Although BATSOEASY offers a more budget-friendly option, the Makita name carries weight in terms of reliability and performance for serious users.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the BATSOEASY Cordless Jig Saw and the Makita XVJ04Z ultimately comes down to your specific needs and budget. The BATSOEASY is an excellent choice for those seeking an affordable, basic jigsaw that covers essential tasks without breaking the bank. On the other hand, the Makita offers advanced features, higher cutting speeds, and a respected brand reputation, justifying its higher price. If you are a professional or a serious hobbyist who values performance and durability, the Makita may be the better investment. However, for casual users or those new to jigsaws, the BATSOEASY presents a compelling option at a fraction of the cost.

