Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 Audiophile 2x2 USB Audio vs Mackie Audio Interface, Onyx Artist 1X2 USB Audio Interface
Updated August 2026 — Mackie Audio Interface, Onyx Artist 1X2 USB Audio Interface leads on audio quality and features.
The Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 offers superior audio quality and features, making it a better choice for professional use, while the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 is a budget-friendly option for beginners.
Why Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 Audiophile 2x2 USB Audio is better
Price
Behringer is cheaper by approximately 22%.
Portability
UM2 is ultra-compact for easy transport.
Direct Monitoring
UM2 has a direct monitor select switch.
Why Mackie Audio Interface, Onyx Artist 1X2 USB Audio Interface is better
Audio Quality
Mackie offers 24-Bit/192kHz recording.
Preamp Quality
Mackie's Onyx preamp has superior fidelity.
Durability
Mackie is built for rugged use.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 Audiophile 2x2 USB Audio | Mackie Audio Interface, Onyx Artist 1X2 USB Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 48 kHz | 24-Bit/192kHz |
| Preamps | XENYX | Onyx |
| Inputs | 2 | 2 |
| Phantom Power | No | Yes |
| Direct Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 and Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2
When comparing the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 and the Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2, it is essential to recognize that both audio interfaces cater to musicians and content creators with distinct needs. The Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 is priced at $42.63, making it about 22% cheaper than the Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2, which retails for $54.95. Each model brings its own unique features and specifications that can significantly impact performance and user experience, depending on the requirements of the user.
Audio Quality and Performance
The Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 offers high-resolution 24-Bit/192kHz recording, providing an impressive fidelity that is ideal for professional applications. In contrast, the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 delivers 48 kHz resolution, which, while decent for home recording, does not match the high-definition capabilities of the Mackie model. This difference in audio quality may be critical for users who prioritize pristine audio in their recordings, particularly in genres that demand nuanced sound reproduction.
Preamp Quality
When it comes to preamp quality, the Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 boasts a boutique-quality Onyx mic preamp, known for its class-leading fidelity and dynamic range, along with 48V phantom power for studio condenser mics. Conversely, the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 features a studio-grade XENYX mic preamp that provides a dynamic range of 100 dB. While both preamps are designed to enhance recording quality, the Mackie model positions itself as superior in terms of fidelity and versatility, particularly for professional studio environments.
Connectivity Options
Both audio interfaces provide essential connectivity options, but they differ in terms of flexibility. The Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 features a ¼” TRS input with a Hi-Z switch, making it suitable for connecting guitars and basses. The Behringer U-PHORIA UM2, on the other hand, offers a combination XLR/TRS input for vocals or line inputs and an additional ¼” instrument input. While both interfaces provide the necessary inputs for recording, the Behringer’s combination input may appeal more to solo musicians who frequently switch between vocal and instrument recordings.
Monitoring Capabilities
In terms of monitoring capabilities, both the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 and Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 offer zero-latency direct monitoring. However, the U-PHORIA UM2 includes a direct monitor select switch, enhancing the user experience for performers by allowing them to hear their performance clearly in real time. The Mackie model also provides dedicated outputs for connecting studio monitors and a powerful headphone output, making it a versatile choice for detailed audio work. Each option excels in its own right, but the direct monitoring features of the Behringer may be particularly beneficial for musicians recording alone.
Build Quality and Portability
The Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 is described as “Built-Like-A-Tank,” emphasizing its durability and resilience for mobile recording. This robust construction is ideal for musicians who frequently travel for gigs. In contrast, the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 is ultra-compact and designed with portability in mind, making it easy to transport. While both interfaces are suitable for mobile use, the choice may depend on whether a user prioritizes ruggedness or compactness in their recording setup.
Software and Compatibility
Both audio interfaces are compatible with popular digital audio workstations (DAWs), ensuring seamless integration for users. The Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 is designed to work with virtually all major recording software, including Avid Pro Tools and Ableton Live. Similarly, the Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 offers a collection of 23 plugins and instruments, enhancing its value for musicians looking to expand their creative toolkit. Depending on a user’s specific software preferences, either model may fit their needs, but the included plugins with the Mackie interface may provide an added incentive.
Pricing and Value for Money
The Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 is priced at $42.63, making it a budget-friendly option for beginner musicians and those looking for basic recording capabilities. In comparison, the Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 is priced at $54.95, which is approximately 29% more expensive. While the Mackie offers superior audio quality and additional features, the value for money in the Behringer may be more appealing for those just starting in music production or on a tighter budget.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 and the Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 ultimately depends on your recording needs and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective, portable solution for basic audio recording, the Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize high-resolution audio, superior preamp quality, and additional features, the Mackie Onyx Artist 1X2 is worth the investment. Each model has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of users in the audio recording landscape.

