BENOISON Telephoto Lens for Nikon - F Lens 420- vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — BENOISON Telephoto Lens for Nikon - F Lens 420- wins on weight and focal length, VILTROX wins on price and build quality.
The BENOISON lens offers a budget-friendly option for long-range photography, while the VILTROX lens excels in low-light and portrait situations with autofocus capabilities.
Why BENOISON Telephoto Lens for Nikon - F Lens 420- is better
Price
BENOISON is significantly cheaper at $67.99.
Focal Length
BENOISON offers a longer focal range of 420-800mm.
Durability
BENOISON is built for outdoor use with robust construction.
Why VILTROX is better
Aperture
VILTROX has a faster f/1.7 aperture for low-light performance.
Autofocus
VILTROX features a quiet autofocus system.
Weight
VILTROX is lighter at 171g, making it more portable.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | BENOISON Telephoto Lens for Nikon - F Lens 420- | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Focus Type | Manual | Autofocus |
| Max Aperture | f/8.3-16 | f/1.7 |
| Lens Type | Telephoto | Prime |
| Camera Mount | Nikon F | Fujifilm X |
| Bokeh Quality | Standard | Excellent |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the BENOISON Telephoto Lens
The BENOISON Telephoto Lens for Nikon is priced at $67.99, making it a budget-friendly choice for photographers who need a long focal length for wildlife or astrophotography. This lens covers a focal range of 420-800mm, allowing for significant zoom capabilities. However, it is strictly a manual focus lens, meaning that users must adjust the focus manually, which may not be ideal for everyone.
This lens is compatible with a wide array of Nikon DSLR cameras, including popular models like the D850 and D3500. Its construction emphasizes durability, making it suited for outdoor photography. The non-adjustable aperture ranges from f/8.3 to f/16, which may limit low-light performance but provides a solid option for daylight shooting.
Overview of the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF
The VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF lens is positioned at a higher price point of $180.00, targeting photographers who prefer a prime lens with a fast aperture. This lens offers an equivalent focal length of 85mm, making it ideal for portraits and low-light situations. The bright f/1.7 maximum aperture allows for greater control over depth of field, which is excellent for creating a pleasing bokeh effect.
Weighing just 171g, this lens is lightweight and convenient for travel. It also features a quiet autofocus system thanks to its STM stepper motor, making it suitable for both photography and videography. The lens is designed specifically for Fujifilm X-Mount cameras, which limits its compatibility compared to the BENOISON telephoto lens.
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the BENOISON Telephoto Lens is about 62% cheaper than the VILTROX 56mm F1.7, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious photographers. The BENOISON lens retails for $67.99, while the VILTROX lens is priced at $180.00. This significant difference means that consumers should carefully consider their needs; if long-range shooting is essential, the BENOISON lens offers a more economical choice.
However, the higher cost of the VILTROX lens may be justified for those who require the advantages of a prime lens, including better low-light performance and autofocus capabilities. Ultimately, the decision may hinge on whether the user prioritizes price or the advanced features of the VILTROX lens.
Intended Use Cases
The BENOISON Telephoto Lens is primarily designed for wildlife photographers or anyone interested in capturing distant subjects, such as the moon. Its long focal length makes it suitable for scenarios where getting close to the subject is not feasible. However, the manual focus requirement could be a drawback for those who need to quickly adjust settings in dynamic shooting environments.
On the other hand, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 excels in portrait photography and low-light conditions, thanks to its fast aperture. Its design caters to users who want to achieve that perfect bokeh effect or need to shoot in challenging lighting. If you are a Fujifilm user focused on portraiture or event photography, the VILTROX lens may be the better option.
Build Quality and Design
The BENOISON lens is built with high-quality materials emphasizing durability, which is crucial for outdoor photography. Its robust construction allows it to withstand the rigors of nature, making it a reliable companion for adventurous photographers. However, it lacks electronic contacts, which means the user must manually set the camera to manual mode to function effectively.
Conversely, the VILTROX lens is lightweight at just 171g, making it ideal for long shooting sessions without causing fatigue. Its nine-blade diaphragm contributes to a pleasing bokeh quality, enhancing portrait shots. Additionally, the integrated micro-USB port allows for firmware updates, ensuring the lens can keep up with technological advancements.
Autofocus and Manual Focus Capabilities
The BENOISON Telephoto Lens is exclusively a manual focus lens, which means photographers must manually adjust the focus ring to achieve the desired sharpness. This can be a limitation for those accustomed to autofocus systems, as it requires more time and precision, particularly in fast-paced shooting situations.
In contrast, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 features an STM stepper motor that offers a quiet autofocus experience. This is particularly beneficial for video recording, as it minimizes noise during operation. If ease of use and quick focusing are priorities, the VILTROX lens stands out as the superior choice.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the BENOISON Telephoto Lens and the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 largely depends on your specific photography needs. If you prioritize a long focal range for wildlife or astrophotography and are on a budget, the BENOISON lens is a solid choice at $67.99. However, if you require a versatile lens for portraits with excellent low-light performance and the convenience of autofocus, the VILTROX lens is worth the investment at $180.00.
Ultimately, both lenses serve distinct purposes and user preferences. Consider what features matter most to you before making a decision.

