Bissell CrossWave HydroSteam Deluxe Steam Mop, vs Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning
Updated August 2026 — Bissell CrossWave HydroSteam Deluxe Steam Mop, leads on self-cleaning and tank system.
The Bissell CrossWave offers superior versatility with its multi-surface cleaning capabilities, while the Shark ZU62 excels in powerful suction for pet hair removal. Choose based on your specific cleaning needs.
Why Bissell CrossWave HydroSteam Deluxe Steam Mop, is better
Versatility
Bissell can vacuum, wash, and steam.
Self-Cleaning
Bissell has one-touch self-cleaning feature.
Sales Rank
Bissell is ranked higher in sales.
Why Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning is better
Suction Power
Shark has powerful suction for deep cleaning.
Dust Cup Size
Shark has a larger dust cup capacity.
Lightweight
Shark is designed for easy maneuverability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Bissell CrossWave HydroSteam Deluxe Steam Mop, | Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $279.99 | $281.11 |
| Sales Rank | 16462 | 253391 |
| Self-Cleaning | Yes | No |
| Multi-Surface | Yes | No |
| Pet Hair | Tangle-Free | Zero-M |
Dimension comparison
Overview
In the realm of vacuum cleaners, the Bissell CrossWave HydroSteam Deluxe Steam Mop and the Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning Brushroll Pet Pro Upright Vacuum represent two distinct cleaning philosophies. The Bissell model, priced at $279.99, focuses on a multi-surface cleaning approach with steam capabilities, while the Shark vacuum, at $281.11, emphasizes powerful suction for deep cleaning and pet hair removal. Both products cater to households with pets, but their methods and features differ significantly.
Cleaning Technology
The Bissell CrossWave utilizes HydroSteam Technology, combining water and steam to tackle tough stains effectively, achieving a 20% faster cleaning rate on greasy messes compared to steam-only cleaners. This makes it particularly effective for kitchens and areas prone to spills. In contrast, the Shark ZU62 features a self-cleaning brushroll, dubbed Zero-M, which continuously eliminates pet hair from the brush while vacuuming. This is beneficial for homes with pets, as it prevents hair wrap and maintains suction efficiency. The emphasis here is on the different cleaning technologies, with Bissell focusing on steam and washing, while Shark prioritizes suction and brushroll innovation.
Versatility
The Bissell CrossWave is a 3-in-1 device that not only vacuums but also washes and steams floors, making it versatile for different surfaces like tile, sealed wood, and laminate. It can even refresh area rugs with powerful steam, making it suitable for various cleaning tasks beyond just vacuuming. Meanwhile, the Shark Navigator is an upright vacuum designed primarily for deep cleaning carpets and hard floors. It has a lightweight design for easy maneuverability and features an extendable hose that allows users to clean stairs and furniture, providing some versatility but less than the Bissell’s multi-functional capabilities.
Pet Hair Management
When it comes to handling pet hair, both products excel in their own ways. The Bissell CrossWave features a tangle-free brushroll designed to handle stubborn pet hair without the hassle of hair wrap. This is crucial for pet owners who often deal with shedding. Conversely, the Shark ZU62's Zero-M self-cleaning brushroll is specifically engineered for nonstop hair removal, ensuring that pet hair doesn't clog the vacuum and affects its performance. While both models are effective in managing pet hair, the Bissell provides a more comprehensive cleaning function, whereas the Shark focuses on maintaining brush roll efficiency.
Ease of Cleaning
The Bissell CrossWave offers one-touch self-cleaning for its brushroll, meaning users can maintain the machine's hygiene without manual effort. This feature is particularly appealing for those who prefer low-maintenance cleaning solutions. On the other hand, the Shark ZU62 has a dust cup capacity of 2.8 quarts, allowing for longer cleaning sessions with fewer interruptions to empty the container. While both products make aspects of cleaning easier, the Bissell’s self-cleaning function gives it an edge in terms of convenience and upkeep.
Price Comparison
With the Bissell priced at $279.99 and the Shark at $281.11, the Bissell CrossWave is about 0.4% cheaper than the Shark vacuum. Additionally, when considering the average price over the past 90 days, the Shark has an average of $266.79, making it about 4.6% cheaper than its current price. This price comparison indicates that while both vacuums are in a similar price range currently, the Shark may offer a better deal based on historical pricing trends.
Sales Rank and Market Position
The Bissell CrossWave holds a sales rank of 16,462, indicating a solid position in the market, while the Shark ZU62 is ranked at 253,391, suggesting it is less popular among consumers. This difference in sales rank may imply that the Bissell is more trusted or sought after for its unique cleaning capabilities, especially in households with pets. A higher sales rank can reflect better consumer satisfaction and reliability, which is important when investing in cleaning equipment.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Bissell CrossWave HydroSteam Deluxe Steam Mop and the Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning Brushroll Pet Pro Upright Vacuum largely depends on your specific cleaning needs. If versatility and multi-surface cleaning are priorities, the Bissell is an excellent choice with its steam function and 3-in-1 capabilities. However, if you primarily need a powerful vacuum that excels in pet hair removal with minimal maintenance, the Shark may be more suitable. Ultimately, both products offer unique benefits, so consider your cleaning habits and preferences before making a decision.

