BLUETTI AC2A Portable Power Station, vs ENOFLO Portable Power Station, 97.
Updated July 2026 — BLUETTI AC2A Portable Power Station, wins on output and capacity, ENOFLO Portable Power Station, 97. wins on charging time.
The BLUETTI AC2A offers superior power capacity and features compared to the ENOFLO, making it the better choice for demanding applications.
Why BLUETTI AC2A Portable Power Station, is better
Higher Capacity
204Wh vs 97.68Wh
Faster Charging
80% in 40 mins vs slower charging
More Outlets
6 outlets vs 1 AC socket
Why ENOFLO Portable Power Station, 97. is better
Lighter Weight
2.2 lbs vs 7.9 lbs
Compact Size
Smaller dimensions for portability
Lower Price
$66.99 vs $149.00
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | BLUETTI AC2A Portable Power Station, | ENOFLO Portable Power Station, 97. |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Type | LiFePO4 | Lithium |
| AC Output | 300W | 120W |
| USB Ports | 6 | 4 |
| Charging Modes | 4 | 3 |
| App Control | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the BLUETTI AC2A and ENOFLO Portable Power Stations
The BLUETTI AC2A is a more powerful option compared to the ENOFLO Portable Power Station, making it suitable for a variety of outdoor and emergency applications. The BLUETTI AC2A offers a capacity of 204Wh, whereas the ENOFLO provides a significantly smaller 97.68Wh. This means that the BLUETTI has more than double the capacity, making it ideal for longer trips or more demanding power needs.
The superior capacity of the BLUETTI AC2A translates to a higher price point at $149.00, compared to ENOFLO's $66.99, which is about 17% cheaper. While the price difference is substantial, the capabilities offered by the BLUETTI may justify the investment for users who require more power.
Power Output Comparison
When it comes to power output, the BLUETTI AC2A stands out with a 300W AC inverter, which can handle up to 600W for power lifting. In contrast, the ENOFLO's maximum output is limited to 120W, which may restrict its use for high-power devices. The significant difference in output makes the BLUETTI more versatile for various applications, from camping to home backup.
With six outlets available on the BLUETTI AC2A, users can power multiple devices simultaneously, while the ENOFLO features only one AC socket along with additional USB and DC ports. This limitation could be a deciding factor for users looking to power several devices at once, making the BLUETTI a more favorable choice in terms of power versatility.
Charging Capabilities
The charging capabilities of both power stations cater to different user needs. The BLUETTI AC2A boasts an impressive 270W Turbo Charging feature, allowing it to reach 80% charge in just 40 minutes and a full charge in 70 minutes. This rapid charging is a significant advantage for users who require quick access to power.
On the other hand, the ENOFLO offers three recharging methods but lacks the rapid charging speed of the BLUETTI. While it can be charged via an AC outlet, solar panel, or car USB-C, the overall efficiency and speed do not match the capabilities of the BLUETTI AC2A. For those who prioritize fast recharging, the BLUETTI clearly takes the lead.
Portability and Design
Portability is a crucial factor for power stations, especially for outdoor use. The ENOFLO is notably lighter at just 2.2 lbs and has a compact design, making it easy to carry during camping trips or outings. Its dimensions are also smaller, which can be a plus for users with limited space.
In contrast, the BLUETTI AC2A weighs 7.9 lbs, which is heavier but still manageable for most users. Its larger size accommodates its higher capacity and additional features. While the ENOFLO’s lightweight design is appealing for casual use, the BLUETTI's added power may be worth the extra weight for those who need it.
Safety Features
Safety is paramount when dealing with portable power stations. The BLUETTI AC2A is equipped with a Battery Management System (BMS) that ensures voltage and temperature control, providing peace of mind during operation. Its LiFePO₄ battery technology is known for longer life and safety, making it suitable for both casual use and emergency situations.
The ENOFLO also incorporates safety features with its BMS, but it does not specify the battery type, which may raise questions about its longevity and safety compared to the more established LiFePO₄ technology in the BLUETTI. For users prioritizing safety and reliability, the BLUETTI AC2A presents a more robust option.
User Experience and Control
The user experience is enhanced with the BLUETTI AC2A, which offers an app for remote monitoring and control. This feature allows users to track their power usage, set charging modes, and perform OTA updates easily via their smartphones. Such technological integration can significantly improve the usability of the power station.
Conversely, the ENOFLO lacks such advanced features, relying instead on a straightforward LED display to indicate status and remaining power. While it is user-friendly, it does not offer the same level of control as the BLUETTI. For tech-savvy users or those looking for advanced management options, the BLUETTI AC2A is the preferred choice.
Applications and Use Cases
The applications for each power station differ significantly due to their power output and capacity. The BLUETTI AC2A, with its 204Wh capacity and multiple output options, is ideal for longer camping trips, RV use, or as a reliable backup during power outages. Its ability to power multiple devices simultaneously makes it a versatile option for various scenarios.
In contrast, the ENOFLO Portable Power Station is better suited for light use, such as charging mobile devices, laptops, or small appliances in emergency situations. While it can handle essential devices, its lower capacity and output limit its usability for more demanding applications. Users should consider their specific needs when choosing between the two.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the BLUETTI AC2A and the ENOFLO Portable Power Station hinges on power requirements and intended use. The BLUETTI AC2A, priced at $149.00, offers superior capacity, faster charging, and advanced features, making it a suitable investment for frequent campers or those needing a reliable emergency backup. On the other hand, the ENOFLO, at $66.99, is an attractive budget option for users with minimal power needs or those seeking a lightweight solution for occasional use. If you prioritize power and functionality, the BLUETTI AC2A is the better choice; for lighter demands, the ENOFLO may suffice.

