BLUETTI Portable Power Station AC180, vs EF ECOFLOW Portable Power Station River 2 Max 500,
Updated July 2026 — BLUETTI Portable Power Station AC180, wins on battery and output, EF ECOFLOW Portable Power Station River 2 Max 500, wins on price and portability.
The BLUETTI AC180 offers superior battery capacity and output power, making it ideal for demanding applications. However, the EF ECOFLOW River 2 Max 500 is more affordable and portable.
Why BLUETTI Portable Power Station AC180, is better
Battery Capacity
AC180 has 1152Wh vs River 2 Max 500's 499Wh
Output Power
AC180 offers 1800W vs River 2 Max 500's 1000W
Charging Speed
AC180 charges to 80% in 45 minutes vs River 2 Max 500's 1 hour
Why EF ECOFLOW Portable Power Station River 2 Max 500, is better
Price
River 2 Max 500 is $298.98 vs AC180's $449.00
Portability
River 2 Max 500 weighs 13.3 lbs vs AC180's unspecified weight
Solar Charging Time
River 2 Max 500 charges in 2.3 hours vs AC180's 2.8-3.3 hours
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | BLUETTI Portable Power Station AC180, | EF ECOFLOW Portable Power Station River 2 Max 500, |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 1152Wh | 499Wh |
| Output Power | 1800W | 1000W |
| Charging Speed | 0-80% in 45 min | 1 hour |
| Solar Input | 500W | 220W |
| Weight | N/A | 13.3 lbs |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The BLUETTI Portable Power Station AC180 is priced at $449.00, while the EF ECOFLOW Portable Power Station River 2 Max 500 is about 33% cheaper at $298.98. This substantial price difference may make the River 2 Max 500 more appealing for budget-conscious consumers. However, the higher price of the AC180 comes with enhanced features, such as a greater battery capacity and higher output, catering to users who need more power for their devices. The decision on which product to purchase may largely depend on the user's budget and power requirements.
Battery Capacity
The BLUETTI AC180 features a robust 1152Wh LiFePO4 battery, significantly outperforming the EF ECOFLOW River 2 Max 500, which has a 499Wh battery. This means the AC180 can store more energy, making it ideal for longer trips or situations where power needs are more demanding. For those who require extended power supply options, the AC180's capacity is a clear advantage. Conversely, the River 2 Max 500's smaller battery may suffice for casual users or short camping trips, but it limits the duration of power availability.
Output Power
When it comes to output power, the BLUETTI AC180 offers a continuous output of 1800W and a peak output of 2700W, allowing it to power larger appliances or multiple devices simultaneously. In contrast, the EF ECOFLOW River 2 Max 500 has a maximum output of 1000W. This means that while the River 2 Max 500 can handle essential appliances, it may struggle with more power-hungry devices. Users who plan to use high-wattage devices or run multiple appliances at once will find the AC180's output capabilities more suitable for their needs.
Charging Speed
The charging speed of the two power stations shows a notable difference. The BLUETTI AC180 can be charged from 0 to 80% in just 45 minutes using a 1440W AC input, making it a highly efficient option for users in need of quick power restoration. Meanwhile, the EF ECOFLOW River 2 Max 500 can recharge in 1 hour using a standard AC outlet. Though both devices offer fast charging, the AC180’s quicker charge time is a significant advantage, especially in urgent situations where power is needed immediately.
Solar Charging
Solar charging capabilities differ between the two models, with the BLUETTI AC180 supporting a solar input of up to 500W for charging in approximately 2.8 to 3.3 hours. The EF ECOFLOW River 2 Max 500, on the other hand, can recharge in as fast as 2.3 hours with just 220W of solar input. While the River 2 Max 500 has a slight edge in solar charging time, the AC180’s higher solar input capacity allows for more versatile solar setups, which can be an essential factor for outdoor enthusiasts looking to harness renewable energy effectively.
Portability
In terms of portability, the EF ECOFLOW River 2 Max 500 weighs only 13.3 lbs, making it a lightweight option that is easy to carry for outdoor activities like camping or RV trips. The BLUETTI AC180, while not specified in weight, comes with numerous features and a larger battery, which may make it bulkier. For users prioritizing easy transportation, the River 2 Max 500 is the better choice. However, if more power and capacity are essential, the trade-off in weight may be worth it for the AC180.
Versatility
The BLUETTI Portable Power Station AC180 provides a robust set of features, including eight outlets, making it a versatile option for a variety of devices. It serves not only as a portable power source but also as a reliable uninterruptible power supply (UPS) for home use. In contrast, the EF ECOFLOW River 2 Max 500 can power 11 essential appliances simultaneously, providing a broader range of ports, including AC outlets and USB-C options. This versatility makes it suitable for different situations, from outdoor adventures to home backup. Ultimately, users should consider which specific features align better with their intended use.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the BLUETTI Portable Power Station AC180 and the EF ECOFLOW River 2 Max 500 depends on individual power needs and budget constraints. The AC180 is ideal for users requiring higher capacity and output for demanding applications, while the River 2 Max 500’s affordability and portability make it a strong contender for casual users or light outdoor use. If battery capacity, quick charging, and output power are your top priorities, the AC180 is the way to go. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly, lightweight option for basic power needs, the River 2 Max 500 is a solid choice.

