Canon 344B006 EF 24- vs FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, Black
Updated July 2026 — Canon 344B006 EF 24- wins on length and focal range, FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, Black wins on weather and weight.
The Canon lens offers versatility and a broader focal range, while the Fujifilm lens excels in portability and weather resistance.
Why Canon 344B006 EF 24- is better
Versatility
Canon offers a zoom range of 24-105mm.
Focusing
Canon allows switching between autofocus and manual.
Sales Rank
Canon has a sales rank of 1703.
Why FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, Black is better
Weight
Fujifilm weighs only 90g.
Weather Resistance
Fujifilm is weather-resistant.
Close Focus
Fujifilm can focus as close as 20cm.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon 344B006 EF 24- | FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, Black |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $509.00 | $499.00 |
| Aperture | f/4.0 | f/2.8 |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Bokeh | Standard | Smooth |
| Warranty | 1 Year | Not Specified |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens and FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens
The Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm lens is priced at $509.00, while the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 lens is slightly cheaper at $499.00, making it about 2% less expensive. Both lenses cater to different photography needs, with the Canon offering versatility in focal length and the Fujifilm focusing on portability and weather resistance. Understanding their distinct features can help you choose the right lens for your photography style.
Design and Portability
The FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 lens is incredibly lightweight at just 90 grams (3.17 ounces) and measures only 23mm (0.91 inches) in length. This makes it an ideal choice for photographers who prioritize portability and need a lens that can be easily carried around for everyday shooting. On the other hand, the Canon 344B006 lens, while still manageable, is larger and more robust, designed for a more extensive range of photography applications. Its versatility comes with a trade-off in weight and size, making it less convenient for casual use compared to the Fujifilm lens.
Focal Length Versatility
The Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm lens features a zoom range that allows for both wide-angle and telephoto shots, making it a versatile option for various photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and events. In contrast, the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 lens has a fixed focal length of 23mm, which is perfect for street photography and capturing wide scenes but lacks the flexibility of the Canon lens. This makes the Canon a better choice for photographers who require a single lens capable of multiple shooting scenarios.
Image Quality and Optical Performance
Both lenses are designed to deliver superior image quality, but they achieve this in different ways. The Canon 344B006 lens features an image-stabilized ultrasonic motor (USM) that ensures quiet and reliable autofocus, making it suitable for shooting in various conditions. The lens also allows you to focus as close as 45 cm (1.5 feet), which is beneficial for capturing detailed shots. The FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 lens, however, boasts refined optical construction with two aspherical elements, delivering outstanding detail and an 11-blade aperture that produces beautiful bokeh in out-of-focus areas. Each lens excels in its domain, with Canon focusing on versatility and Fujifilm on optical precision.
Weather Resistance
The FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 lens is built with a weather-resistant design that protects it from dust, moisture, and temperatures as low as -10°C (14°F). This feature is crucial for outdoor photographers who work in challenging environments. In contrast, the Canon 344B006 lens does not highlight weather resistance in its features, making it potentially less suitable for harsh conditions. If you often shoot outdoors and encounter unpredictable weather, the Fujifilm lens would be a more reliable choice.
Focusing Capabilities
Focusing capabilities differ between the two lenses, with the Canon lens allowing you to switch between autofocus and manual operation. This flexibility is ideal for photographers who prefer manual control in certain situations. The Canon's close focusing distance of 45 cm (1.5 feet) is also advantageous for capturing detailed images. The FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 lens, on the other hand, can focus as close as 20 cm (7.87 inches), enabling frame-filling shots of smaller subjects. This makes the Fujifilm lens particularly suitable for macro-style photography, while the Canon lens provides broader operational flexibility.
Price Comparison
The Canon 344B006 lens is priced at $509.00, while the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 lens is $499.00, making the Fujifilm lens about $10 cheaper. While the price difference might seem minor, it reflects the differing features and intended applications of each lens. The Canon lens is ranked 1703 in sales, indicating its popularity, while the Fujifilm lens does not have a specified sales rank, suggesting it may appeal to a more niche market. Budget-conscious photographers may find the Fujifilm lens to offer better value, especially given its weather-resistant features.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm lens and the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 lens ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you require versatility and a broad focal range, the Canon lens is the better option, despite its higher price. However, if you prioritize portability, weather resistance, and specific shooting conditions like street or macro photography, the Fujifilm lens offers excellent optical performance at a slightly lower price. Consider what features are most important to you, and make your choice accordingly.

