Canon 344B006 EF 24- vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
Updated July 2026 — Canon 344B006 EF 24- wins on stabilization and versatility, Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on build and autofocus.
The Canon lens offers more versatility and image stabilization, while the Fujinon lens excels in affordability and bokeh quality.
Why Canon 344B006 EF 24- is better
Versatility
Canon lens has a zoom range of 24-105mm.
Image Stabilization
Canon lens includes image stabilization.
Brand Reputation
Canon has a strong reputation in the lens market.
Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better
Price
Fujinon lens is $60 cheaper.
Bokeh Quality
Fujinon lens has a nine-blade aperture for better bokeh.
Weather Resistance
Fujinon lens is weather-resistant.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon 344B006 EF 24- | Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 35mm |
| Max Aperture | f/4.0 | f/2.0 |
| Weight | 700g | 200g |
| Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is notably more affordable than the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens, priced at $449.00 compared to $509.00. This puts the Fujinon lens about 12% cheaper than its Canon counterpart. While both lenses offer excellent quality, the price difference may influence buyers looking for value without sacrificing performance. The Canon lens, however, does have a slightly higher average price over the last 90 days at $518.83, which suggests it might be more popular or in higher demand.
Build Quality and Design
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, allowing it to perform under challenging conditions, including temperatures as low as 14 degrees. This feature makes it an excellent choice for photographers who often shoot outdoors in varying weather conditions. In contrast, the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L has a durable build but lacks the same level of weather sealing. The Canon lens is designed for versatility and ease of use, but if extreme weather is a factor in your shooting environment, the Fujinon may have the edge.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus capabilities of both lenses are impressive, but the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR takes the lead with an autofocus speed of just 0.08 seconds. This quick response time is ideal for capturing fast-moving subjects and ensures that you won’t miss critical moments. The Canon lens also features an ultrasonic motor (USM) for silent and reliable operation, but its autofocus speed isn’t specified. For photographers prioritizing speed, the Fujinon lens stands out as the more efficient option.
Image Stabilization
Image stabilization is a significant feature for many photographers, and the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L incorporates an image stabilization system that helps reduce camera shake. This is particularly valuable for shooting at slower shutter speeds or in low-light situations. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR does not mention any image stabilization features, which means users may need to rely more on their camera handling or faster shutter speeds to avoid blurred images. For those who frequently shoot handheld, the Canon lens may offer a more forgiving shooting experience.
Versatility in Focal Length
The Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is a versatile zoom lens with a focal length range from 24mm to 105mm, making it suitable for a wide range of photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. In comparison, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR has a fixed focal length of 35mm, equivalent to 53mm in 35mm format. While the Fujinon lens offers sharp images with impressive bokeh, it lacks the flexibility of the Canon lens for varying shooting situations. Photographers who value versatility may lean towards the Canon option.
Bokeh Quality
When it comes to bokeh quality, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR excels with its nine-blade aperture, which creates smooth and circular bokeh. This characteristic is particularly appealing for portrait photographers looking to achieve a soft background blur. The Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L also produces good bokeh, but the specific aperture blade design isn’t highlighted in its features. If bokeh quality is a primary concern for your photography, the Fujinon lens may deliver a more aesthetically pleasing effect.
Brand Reputation and Popularity
Canon has a long-standing reputation in the camera lens market, and the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L has a sales rank of 1703, indicating that it is a popular choice among users. While there is no sales rank available for the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR, Fujifilm is also well-regarded for its quality optics. The established reputation of Canon may provide added confidence for buyers, especially those who are familiar with the brand's offerings and performance.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens and the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR hinges on your specific photography needs. If you prioritize versatility, autofocus speed, and image stabilization, the Canon lens may be the better choice despite its higher price. However, if you’re looking for an affordable, weather-resistant prime lens with excellent bokeh and fast autofocus performance, the Fujinon lens is an outstanding option. Consider your shooting style and conditions to make the best decision for your photography endeavors.

