Canon 344B006 EF 24- vs Tamron 17-
Updated July 2026 — Canon 344B006 EF 24- wins on build and compatibility, Tamron 17- wins on focus and optics.
The Canon lens offers a better price and versatility, while the Tamron excels in low-light performance and close focusing. Choose based on your camera system and shooting needs.
Why Canon 344B006 EF 24- is better
Price
Canon is $90 cheaper
Versatility
Canon has a wider focal range
Build
Canon is more robust for professional use
Why Tamron 17- is better
Aperture
Tamron has a wider f/2.8 aperture
Close Focus
Tamron has a minimum object distance of 7.5 inches
Stabilization
Tamron features advanced VC technology
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon 344B006 EF 24- | Tamron 17- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 17-70mm |
| Max Aperture | f/4.0 | f/2.8 |
| Weight | 700g | 525g |
| Filter Size | 77mm | 67mm |
| Close Focus | 45cm | 7.5in |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens and Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens
The Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens is priced at $509.00, while the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens is available for $599.00. This makes the Canon lens about 17% cheaper than the Tamron, offering a notable price advantage. However, both lenses cater to different types of photography needs, with unique features that may appeal to distinct audiences.
Design and Build Quality
The Canon lens boasts a robust construction typical of L-series lenses, ensuring durability for professional use. It features a filter size of 77 mm and includes an image-stabilized ultrasonic motor (USM) for silent and reliable operation. In contrast, the Tamron lens is designed specifically for Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras, emphasizing a lightweight build with a moisture-resistant construction and fluorine coating. This makes the Tamron lens more suitable for outdoor photography in varying weather conditions, although the Canon lens may feel more substantial and substantial in hand.
Optical Performance
In terms of optical performance, the Canon lens offers a versatile focal length range of 24-105mm with a constant aperture of f/4.0, making it ideal for a variety of shooting situations. The Tamron lens, on the other hand, features a wider aperture of f/2.8 across its 17-70mm zoom range, which is advantageous for low-light scenarios and achieving better background blur. The Tamron's 16 elements in 12 groups, including advanced lens elements, are designed to provide outstanding optical performance and minimize aberrations, making it an excellent choice for those prioritizing image quality.
Focusing Capabilities
Focusing capabilities differ significantly between the two lenses. The Canon lens allows for a close focusing distance of 45 cm (about 1.5 feet), providing excellent versatility for close-up shots. Meanwhile, the Tamron lens excels in this area with a minimum object distance (MOD) of just 7.5 inches at 17mm and 15.4 inches at 70mm, making it incredibly adept at capturing detailed subjects up close. This feature is particularly useful for macro photography enthusiasts who want to explore intricate details.
Image Stabilization
Image stabilization is another area where the two lenses diverge. The Canon lens utilizes an ultrasonic motor (USM) that includes stabilization technology to reduce camera shake effectively. The Tamron lens, however, incorporates a more advanced Vibration Compensation (VC) system, enhanced by AI technology for video shooting, which promises improved stabilization performance compared to traditional methods. This makes the Tamron particularly appealing for videographers or those who frequently shoot handheld in dynamic environments.
Compatibility and Use Cases
The Canon lens is compatible with Canon's full-frame and APS-C DSLR cameras, while the Tamron lens is tailored specifically for Sony E mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. This distinction is crucial as it influences the type of users each lens will attract. Photographers using Canon DSLRs will find the Canon lens a natural fit, making it a versatile option for various styles, from landscapes to portraits. Conversely, the Tamron lens is designed to maximize the capabilities of Sony's mirrorless systems, making it a go-to lens for everyday shooting needs with a focus on portability and convenience.
Price and Value
When it comes to price, the Canon lens is currently priced at $509.00, whereas the Tamron lens is listed at $599.00. This $90 price difference can be significant for photographers on a budget. However, considering the features and specifications, the Tamron offers a wider aperture and advanced stabilization technology, which may justify the higher price for users who prioritize these attributes. Ultimately, the value each lens offers will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens largely depends on your camera system and shooting style. If you are a Canon user seeking a reliable, versatile lens for a variety of photography scenarios, the Canon lens is a solid choice, especially at a lower price point. However, if you are a Sony APS-C mirrorless camera user looking for a lens that excels in low light and provides excellent close focusing capabilities, the Tamron lens may be worth the extra investment. Each lens has its strengths, making the final decision a matter of personal preference and intended use.

