vsversusfinder

Canon 344B006 EF 24- vs Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony

Updated July 2026 — Canon 344B006 EF 24- wins on price and warranty, Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony wins on weight and aperture.

The Canon lens offers great versatility at a lower price, while the Tamron excels in low-light performance and portability.

Why Canon 344B006 EF 24- is better

Price

Canon lens is $509.00, cheaper than Tamron's $699.00

Focal Length

Canon offers a versatile 24-105mm range

Warranty

Canon includes a 1-year manufacturer's warranty

Why Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony is better

Low Light

Tamron has a faster F2.8 aperture for better low-light performance

Weight

Tamron is lighter at 20.3 oz compared to Canon

Weather Resistance

Tamron features moisture-resistant construction

Overall score

Canon 344B006 EF 24-
75
Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony
85

Specifications

SpecCanon 344B006 EF 24-Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony
Max Aperturef/4.0f/2.8
Focal Length24-105mm28-200mm
Weight28 oz20.3 oz
Image StabilizationYesNo
Weather SealingNoYes

Dimension comparison

Canon 344B006 EF 24-Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony

Overview of the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens

The Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens is priced at $509.00, making it a strong contender for photographers seeking a reliable and versatile lens. This lens features an image stabilised ultrasonic motor (USM) that ensures silent and dependable operation, ideal for both still photography and video recording. It allows users to focus as close as 45 cm, which is beneficial for capturing detailed shots. With a manufacturer's warranty of one year, the Canon lens is positioned as a solid investment for enthusiasts and professionals alike.

Overview of the Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD

The Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD lens retails at $699.00, making it about 37% more expensive than the Canon lens. This lens stands out as it offers a fast maximum aperture of F2.8 at the wide-angle end, which is a significant advantage for low-light photography. Weighing just 20.3 oz and measuring 4.6 inches in length, it provides excellent portability, making it suitable for travel and outdoor photography. Its moisture-resistant construction further enhances durability, catering to photographers who encounter diverse weather conditions.

Performance in Low Light Conditions

When it comes to low-light performance, the Tamron lens has a distinct edge due to its maximum aperture of F2.8 at 28mm. This feature allows it to capture more light, resulting in brighter images even in dim conditions. In contrast, the Canon lens maintains a constant aperture of f/4.0, which, while competent, does not match the Tamron's capabilities. The Tamron's design includes special lens elements to ensure high-quality image rendering throughout its zoom range, enhancing its effectiveness in challenging lighting situations.

Versatility in Focal Length

The Canon 344B006 offers a focal length range of 24-105mm, providing versatility for various types of photography, from landscapes to portraits. This range is particularly appealing for those looking to use a single lens for multiple scenarios. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-200 covers a broader focal range of 28-200mm, making it even more versatile for capturing distant subjects and wide-angle shots. This flexibility allows users to adapt to different photographic needs without frequently changing lenses.

Autofocus and Manual Options

Autofocus capabilities are crucial for fast-paced photography, and both lenses deliver in this area. The Canon lens features a USM motor that is designed for silent and reliable autofocus, making it suitable for video work as well. It also allows users to switch between autofocus and manual operation, providing greater control. The Tamron lens utilizes an RXD stepping motor unit that is exceptionally quiet, which is advantageous in environments where silence is essential. Both options present robust autofocus solutions, but the Tamron's design aims to enhance user experience with an emphasis on quiet operation.

Build Quality and Durability

The build quality of both lenses is commendable, but they cater to slightly different needs. The Canon 344B006 is engineered for professional use, offering robust features like an image stabiliser and a filter size of 77 mm. However, it lacks specific weather-sealing features. Conversely, the Tamron lens is built with moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, making it more suitable for outdoor and variable weather photography. This added durability could be a significant factor for photographers who often shoot in less predictable environments.

User Experience and Handling

User experience can significantly influence the choice between these two lenses. The Canon lens, with its well-established reputation and sales rank of 1703, suggests a strong track record among users. It is designed to provide a comfortable grip and intuitive handling. The Tamron lens, while not ranked, boasts a compact size and lightweight design, making it easier to carry for extended periods. Both lenses are user-friendly, but the choice may come down to personal preference regarding handling and comfort during long shoots.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens and the Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD ultimately depends on your specific needs as a photographer. If you prioritize versatility and a reliable, well-tested option at a lower price point, the Canon lens at $509.00 may be your best bet. However, if you are looking for a lens that excels in low-light conditions and offers greater focal range, the Tamron lens, albeit at a higher price of $699.00, could be worth the investment. Each lens has its strengths, making them appealing for different types of photography enthusiast and professional alike.