Canon EF vs Canon RF 75-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 75- leads on focal length and weight.
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens excels in low-light performance and portability, while the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens offers versatility for distant subjects.
Why Canon EF is better
Price
The EF 50mm is more affordable.
Low-light
Better performance in low-light conditions.
Weight
Lighter and more portable.
Why Canon RF 75- is better
Versatility
Offers a wider focal range.
Zoom Capability
Allows for capturing distant subjects.
Optical Quality
Optimized for sharpness and clarity.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF | Canon RF 75- |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Type | Prime | Zoom |
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 | f/4-5.6 |
| Min Focus | 1.15 ft | 4.9 ft |
| Weight | 5.6 oz | 1 lb |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is an ideal choice for photographers looking for a compact prime lens with a fast aperture. Priced at $169.00, this lens is designed for both full-frame and APS-C cameras, offering a versatile focal length that excels in various photography scenarios. With its bright f/1.8 maximum aperture, it is particularly well-suited for low-light conditions, allowing users to capture sharp images with beautiful background blur.
This lens features a stepping motor (STM) that provides near-silent autofocus, making it an excellent option for both still photography and video work. Weighing approximately 5.6 oz., it is lightweight and portable, making it easy to carry around for everyday shooting. Its minimum focusing distance of 1.15 feet allows for detailed close-ups, further enhancing its versatility.
Overview of the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is a lightweight telephoto zoom lens priced at $253.95. Designed for Canon's RF-mount mirrorless cameras, it offers a versatile focal length range ideal for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife and sports. With its variable aperture of f/4-5.6, this lens balances reach and portability without compromising image quality.
At just over 1 lb, this lens remains travel-friendly while providing a focal length equivalent of 120-480mm on APS-C cameras. Its optical design is optimized for sharpness and clarity, featuring Canon’s Super Spectra Coating to minimize lens flare and ghosting. The RF 75-300mm also allows for semi-macro shooting, with a minimum focusing distance of 4.9 feet, making it suitable for detailed close-ups.
Comparison of Focal Lengths
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens offers a fixed focal length of 50mm, while the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens provides a versatile zoom range of 75-300mm. This significant difference in focal lengths allows each lens to serve different photographic needs. The 50mm lens is perfect for portraits and close-ups, offering a natural perspective similar to the human eye. In contrast, the 75-300mm lens excels in capturing distant subjects, making it ideal for wildlife and sports photography.
Photographers who prioritize versatility may lean toward the RF 75-300mm lens due to its zoom capabilities, which allow for a broader range of compositions without changing lenses. However, the fixed focal length of the EF 50mm lens encourages a more intentional approach to framing shots, which can enhance creativity.
Aperture Performance
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens features a maximum aperture of f/1.8, providing excellent low-light performance and the ability to achieve a shallow depth of field. This is particularly advantageous for portrait photography, where background blur (bokeh) is often desired. The seven-blade circular diaphragm contributes to aesthetically pleasing out-of-focus areas, enhancing the overall image quality.
On the other hand, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens has a variable aperture that ranges from f/4 at 75mm to f/5.6 at 300mm. While this aperture range is suitable for general photography, it does not offer the same low-light capabilities as the EF 50mm lens. Consequently, the 50mm lens shines in conditions where natural light is limited, while the RF lens is more versatile for varied shooting situations during the day.
Autofocus Capabilities
The EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is equipped with a stepping motor (STM) that allows for near-silent autofocus, making it ideal for video recording and capturing fleeting moments in still photography. This feature enhances the lens's usability in situations where noise could be disruptive, such as during interviews or nature shoots.
In comparison, the RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens utilizes a DC motor for autofocus, which provides responsive and accurate focusing performance. While both lenses are designed to deliver quick and reliable autofocus, the quiet operation of the STM in the 50mm lens offers a distinct advantage for filmmakers and content creators who require minimal focus noise.
Weight and Portability
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens weighs approximately 5.6 oz., making it a highly portable option for photographers on the go. Its compact size and lightweight design allow it to easily fit into camera bags, making it an ideal everyday lens.
Conversely, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is slightly heavier at just over 1 lb, which is still relatively lightweight for a telephoto zoom lens. While it remains easy to carry, the additional weight may be noticeable during extended shoots. The 75-300mm lens is designed for versatility, but photographers who favor minimal gear might prefer the more compact form factor of the 50mm lens.
Price Comparison
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is priced at $169.00, while the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens costs $253.95. This makes the 50mm lens approximately 33% cheaper than its counterpart, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious photographers seeking quality performance without breaking the bank.
Although the RF 75-300mm lens offers a broader focal range and more versatility, the price difference may lead some photographers to prioritize the affordability of the 50mm lens, especially if they are primarily focused on portrait or low-light photography.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens and the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens largely depends on your photography needs. If you prioritize low-light performance, portrait photography, and compactness, the EF 50mm is the clear winner. However, if you require a versatile zoom lens for capturing distant subjects, the RF 75-300mm provides significantly more flexibility. Ultimately, your decision should align with the types of photography you plan to pursue, as each lens offers unique advantages that cater to different styles and scenarios.

