Canon EF vs Canon RF 75-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF wins on price and focus distance, Canon RF 75- wins on weight and size.
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is a budget-friendly option ideal for portraits and low-light photography, while the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens offers versatility for sports and wildlife. The choice depends on your specific photography needs.
Why Canon EF is better
Price
The 50mm lens is significantly cheaper.
Low-light
The f/1.8 aperture excels in low-light conditions.
Compact
The 50mm lens is smaller and lighter.
Why Canon RF 75- is better
Zoom Range
The 75-300mm lens offers a versatile zoom range.
Versatility
Better suited for sports and wildlife photography.
Close Focus
Allows for semi-macro photography.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF | Canon RF 75- |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/4-5.6 |
| Focal Length | 50mm | 75-300mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.21x | 0.25x |
| Autofocus | STM | DC Motor |
| Filter Size | 49mm | 58mm |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is designed for everyday photography, offering a versatile focal length that excels in various shooting conditions. Priced at $155.99, it is an economical option for photographers seeking high-quality images without breaking the bank. With a maximum aperture of f/1.8, this lens is particularly suited for portraits and low-light situations, allowing for stunning background blur and sharp subject isolation.
The lens features a compact design and a minimum focusing distance of 1.15 ft., making it very user-friendly for both novice and experienced photographers. Its STM motor ensures near-silent autofocus, ideal for capturing video as well as still images. Overall, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM is a reliable choice for those wanting to enhance their photography skills without a hefty investment.
Overview of the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens offers a more extensive zoom range, making it a versatile tool for various photography styles, especially sports and wildlife. Priced at $253.95, this lens is about 63% more expensive than the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM. However, the price reflects its advanced features, including a variable aperture that balances reach and portability.
Weighing just over 1 lb, this lens is designed for ease of transport and usability, making it perfect for photographers on the go. With a minimum focus distance of 4.9 ft. and maximum magnification of 0.25x, it also allows for semi-macro photography, enhancing its versatility. The RF 75-300mm is optimized for sharpness and clarity, benefiting from Canon’s Super Spectra Coating, making it a great option for a variety of shooting conditions.
Build Quality and Design
The build quality of both lenses reflects Canon's commitment to durability and performance. The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry for everyday use. Its simple design features a standard 49mm filter thread, which is common among similar lenses, making it easy to find compatible accessories.
In contrast, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is slightly larger but remains lightweight for a telephoto lens. Its design incorporates a 58mm filter thread, and despite its longer focal range, it maintains a slim profile, ensuring it is travel-friendly. Both lenses feature Canon’s Super Spectra Coating, which helps to minimize lens flare and ghosting, ensuring you get the best image quality in various lighting conditions.
Image Quality and Performance
In terms of image quality, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM excels in producing sharp images with excellent contrast and color accuracy, particularly in low-light situations. The f/1.8 aperture allows for beautiful subject isolation and creamy bokeh, making it a favorite for portrait photographers. Its STM motor ensures quick and silent autofocus, which is beneficial for shooting both stills and videos.
On the other hand, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens also delivers impressive image quality, with sharpness enhanced across the zoom range. This lens is particularly effective for capturing distant subjects, making it ideal for sports and wildlife photography. Its variable aperture allows flexibility, although it may not be as effective in low-light conditions as the f/1.8 aperture of the 50mm lens. However, the RF 75-300mm's ability to produce smooth bokeh and detailed close-ups compensates for its limitations, offering a well-rounded performance.
Autofocus Capabilities
The autofocus systems of both lenses are designed to cater to different shooting styles. The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens features a stepping motor (STM) that provides near-silent and continuous autofocus. This is particularly advantageous for filmmakers and those shooting in quiet environments, as it allows for smooth focus transitions without distracting sounds.
Conversely, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens uses a DC motor for autofocus, delivering responsive and accurate focusing performance. While it may not be as silent as the STM motor, it is effective for both still photography and video work, particularly in dynamic settings like sports or wildlife photography. The choice between the two largely depends on the specific needs of the photographer, be it silence for video or versatility for various photography scenarios.
Pricing and Value
The pricing of the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM at $155.99 makes it an attractive entry-level lens for photographers looking to improve their craft without a significant financial commitment. Its price point offers excellent value given its performance and versatility in different shooting scenarios.
In contrast, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is priced at $253.95, which is about 63% more than the 50mm lens. While it offers extended reach and versatility, the higher price may not appeal to every photographer, especially those who primarily shoot in situations where a prime lens would suffice. Nonetheless, for those needing a telephoto option, the RF 75-300mm can justify its price through its broader capabilities.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens and the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and budget. The 50mm lens is ideal for portrait and low-light photography, offering excellent image quality at a budget-friendly price of $155.99. On the other hand, the 75-300mm lens is better suited for wildlife and sports photography, providing a versatile zoom range for $253.95.
If you're starting out or primarily need a lens for everyday photography, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM is an excellent choice. However, if you're looking for a lens that can handle a wider variety of subjects and shooting conditions, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 lens may be worth the investment. Ultimately, both lenses cater to different styles of photography, so your decision should align with your personal shooting preferences and requirements.

