Canon EF vs Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF wins on focal length, Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on price and weight.
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is a budget-friendly option ideal for portraits, while the Canon RF35mm f/1.8 is Macro STM Lens offers advanced features for macro photography.
Why Canon EF is better
Price
EF 50mm is significantly cheaper at $155.99.
Weight
EF 50mm is lighter and more portable.
Simplicity
EF 50mm offers a straightforward design for casual use.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Macro Capability
RF35mm offers 0.5x magnification for close-up shots.
Image Stabilization
RF35mm includes optical stabilization for better handheld shooting.
Versatility
RF35mm's wider focal length is more versatile for various photography styles.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focusing Distance | 1.15 ft | 0.56 ft |
| Mount Type | EF | RF |
| Autofocus | STM | STM |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is priced at $155.99, making it significantly more affordable than the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, which retails for $499.00. This price difference of $343.01 means the RF35mm is about 120% more expensive than the EF 50mm. For photographers on a budget or those just starting out, the lower price of the EF 50mm offers an enticing entry point into prime lens photography without sacrificing quality.
Optical Performance
Both lenses offer impressive optical performance, but they cater to different photographic needs. The EF 50mm f/1.8 features a maximum aperture of f/1.8, which excels in low-light conditions and provides excellent background blur, making it perfect for portraits and action shots. In contrast, the RF35mm f/1.8 also has a maximum aperture of f/1.8 but is designed with a macro capability, allowing for a 0.5x magnification ratio. This makes the RF35mm particularly well-suited for close-up photography, showcasing detail that the EF 50mm cannot achieve.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon EF 50mm has a focal length of 50mm, providing a standard perspective on full-frame cameras, while effectively becoming an 80mm lens on APS-C cameras. This makes it versatile for various shooting scenarios, from portraits to street photography. On the other hand, the RF35mm offers a wider angle at 35mm, giving it an advantage for landscape and environmental portraits. This broader focal length makes the RF35mm a more versatile choice for photographers who frequently shoot in diverse conditions, although it may not provide the same level of background separation as the EF 50mm.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the Canon RF35mm f/1.8 boasts a compact form factor with a control ring for direct setting changes, enhancing usability during shoots. It also includes optical image stabilization, which helps reduce camera shake by up to 5 stops, making it ideal for handheld shooting in various lighting situations. The EF 50mm, while compact and lightweight, does not feature stabilization but is made with a robust build quality that is typical of Canon’s lens offerings. The choice between these lenses may come down to user preference for added features like stabilization and ease of use versus a more straightforward design.
Autofocus Capabilities
The EF 50mm f/1.8 utilizes a stepping motor (STM) for autofocus, which allows for near-silent and smooth focusing, particularly beneficial for video recording. This performance is complemented by full-time manual focus override. The RF35mm also features STM technology, ensuring fast and quiet autofocus, ideal for both stills and video. While both lenses provide reliable autofocus, the RF35mm’s additional features, such as the control ring and image stabilization, may offer more flexibility for certain shooting scenarios, particularly in dynamic environments.
Compatibility and Use Cases
Compatibility varies between the two lenses due to their respective mounts. The EF 50mm is designed for Canon's EF mount cameras, while the RF35mm is specifically made for the EOS R series of cameras. This distinction is crucial for photographers who own different camera types. The RF35mm’s macro abilities make it an excellent choice for macro photography, while the EF 50mm is more traditional, serving well in portrait and general photography. This difference could influence a photographer's decision based on their equipment and preferred shooting style.
User Experience and Practicality
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 is generally praised for its ease of use and lightweight design, making it a favorite among casual photographers and enthusiasts who want a reliable lens for everyday use. Meanwhile, the RF35mm f/1.8 offers advanced features that appeal to more serious photographers looking for versatility, especially those interested in macro photography. Both lenses are designed to enhance the user experience, but the choice largely depends on whether the photographer prioritizes simplicity and cost-effectiveness or advanced functionality and versatility.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens and the Canon RF35mm f/1.8 is a matter of personal preference and specific photographic needs. If your focus is on budget-friendly options and classic portrait photography, the EF 50mm at $155.99 represents excellent value. However, for those who require a more versatile lens with macro capabilities and advanced features, the RF35mm at $499.00 justifies its higher price tag. Ultimately, your decision should align with your photography style and the camera system you use.

