vsversusfinder

Canon EF vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF wins on focal length and aperture, VILTROX wins on weight and length.

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is a more budget-friendly option, while the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji offers enhanced features for advanced users.

Why Canon EF is better

Price

Canon is $23.01 cheaper.

Weight

Canon is lighter and more portable.

Brand Recognition

Canon is a well-established brand in photography.

Why VILTROX is better

Aperture

VILTROX has a wider f/1.7 aperture.

Close Focus

VILTROX has a closer minimum focusing distance.

Optical Design

VILTROX has advanced optical elements for better image quality.

Overall score

Canon EF
85
VILTROX
90

Specifications

SpecCanon EFVILTROX
BrandCanonVILTROX
Price$155.99$179.00
Focal Length50mm35mm
Aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Min Focus1.15 ft0.33 m

Dimension comparison

Canon EFVILTROX

Overview of the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens and VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is priced at $155.99, while the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji is available for $179.00, making the Canon lens about 17% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different photography needs and camera systems, appealing to a variety of users, from casual shooters to more dedicated enthusiasts. The Canon lens is known for its classic 50mm focal length, ideal for general photography, whereas the VILTROX lens provides a slightly wider 35mm perspective, perfect for capturing street scenes and portraits.

Build Quality and Design

When it comes to build quality and design, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is compact and lightweight, making it highly portable for everyday use. Its thoughtful design includes a Super Spectra coating that minimizes flare and ghosting, enhancing contrast and color accuracy. Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji features an extended lens hood, helping to block stray light and improve image contrast. Its design incorporates 11 elements in 9 groups, including specialized elements to ensure high image quality. Both lenses demonstrate durability and practicality, but the VILTROX's additional features may appeal to those seeking enhanced performance in challenging lighting conditions.

Focal Length and Aperture

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens has a focal length of 50mm, which is ideal for portraits and general photography, offering an effective focal length of 80mm on APS-C cameras. The aperture of f/1.8 allows for excellent low-light performance and depth of field control. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji offers a slightly wider focal length of 35mm, which is approximately equivalent to a 52.5mm focal length on APS-C cameras. With a maximum aperture of f/1.7, it provides even better low-light capabilities and beautiful bokeh for artistic shots. While both lenses excel in low-light scenarios, the VILTROX may give photographers a slight edge in terms of background blur.

Autofocus Performance

In terms of autofocus performance, both lenses employ stepping motor (STM) technology to deliver fast and near-silent autofocus. The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is particularly known for its smooth autofocus capabilities, which are beneficial for both still photography and video recording. The VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji also features a new STM motor, enhancing its autofocus speed while minimizing focus breathing, making it a strong contender for videographers. Both lenses cater to users who prioritize quick and precise focusing, but the VILTROX’s design aims to provide a more seamless experience during video transitions.

Minimum Focusing Distance

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens boasts a minimum focusing distance of 1.15 feet (0.35m), allowing photographers to capture subjects relatively close-up. This feature is ideal for portraiture and detail shots. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji offers a closer minimum focusing distance of just 0.33 meters (approximately 1.08 feet), enabling stunning close-up photography with intricate details. For photographers who frequently shoot macro or detail-oriented images, the VILTROX may be the preferable option, providing additional versatility in various shooting scenarios.

Image Quality

Both lenses are designed to deliver impressive image quality, but their approaches differ. The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens utilizes a Super Spectra coating to reduce flare and ghosting, ensuring vibrant colors and high contrast in challenging lighting conditions. The VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji, with its advanced optical design comprising 11 elements, including two High Refractive elements and one Extra-low Dispersion element, aims to minimize chromatic aberrations and distortion. This results in sharp, vivid images across a variety of photography styles. While both lenses produce excellent images, the VILTROX's additional optical elements may offer an advantage in terms of overall sharpness and clarity.

Price Comparison

At a price of $155.99, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens is positioned as a more budget-friendly option compared to the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji, which retails for $179.00. This price difference of approximately $23.01 could be a significant factor for photographers working within a budget. The lower price point of the Canon lens, combined with its solid performance, makes it an attractive choice for those new to photography or looking for a reliable prime lens without breaking the bank. On the other hand, the VILTROX, while slightly more expensive, offers features that may justify the price for more advanced users seeking specific capabilities.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens and the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji ultimately depends on your photography style and needs. The Canon lens is a versatile and cost-effective option for general photography, especially if you’re using full-frame or APS-C cameras. With its excellent low-light performance and compact design, it’s ideal for everyday shooting. The VILTROX lens, with its wider focal length, superior close-focusing capabilities, and refined optical design, may appeal to those looking for enhanced performance in street photography and videography. If budget constraints are a primary concern, the Canon lens stands out as the more economical choice, but for users seeking advanced features, the VILTROX could be worth the investment.