Canon EF 75- vs Canon EFS 55-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and closest focus, Canon EFS 55- wins on weight and length.
The Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II offers superior features and image stabilization, making it the better choice for serious photographers.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
$169.00 is significantly cheaper than $317.59
Weight
Lighter design for easier handling
Focal Length
Longer focal length range of 75-300mm
Why Canon EFS 55- is better
Image Stabilization
4-stop Image Stabilizer for better low-light performance
Optical Quality
Includes UD-glass element for improved image quality
Focusing Speed
Faster focusing with DC motor and gear-driven design
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Canon EFS 55- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $169.00 | $317.59 |
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 55-250mm |
| Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/4-5.6 |
| Stabilization | None | 4-stop IS |
| Focus System | Micromotor | DC Motor |
| Elements | 13 elements | 12 elements |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens offers a focal length range of 75-300mm, making it suitable for various photography needs, especially in capturing distant subjects. Priced at $169.00, it is approximately 17% cheaper than its competitor, the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II, which retails for $317.59. This lens features a front group rotating extension system with a micromotor for focus adjustment and a closest focusing distance of 1.5m (4.9 ft). Its construction includes 13 elements in 9 groups, providing a decent quality for the price.
Overview of Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II Telephoto Zoom Lens is designed specifically for Canon's digital SLR cameras with the smaller EF-S lens mount. Priced at $317.59, it boasts a focal length of 55-250mm and features Canon's 4-stop Image Stabilizer technology. This allows users to shoot at slower shutter speeds without a significant increase in image blur. With 12 elements in 10 groups, including one UD-glass element, this lens is engineered to deliver high image quality, making it a solid option for photographers looking for versatility and performance.
Build Quality and Design
The build quality of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is satisfactory for its price point, featuring a design that is lightweight and easy to handle. Its 13 elements in 9 groups offer a reasonable level of optical performance, although it is primarily designed for amateur photographers. In contrast, the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II presents a more sophisticated design, with 12 elements in 10 groups, including one UD-glass element that enhances image quality. This lens is slightly heavier but retains a compact profile, making it more suitable for extended use.
Image Stabilization Features
Image stabilization is a key feature where the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II excels. With its 4-stop Image Stabilizer technology, it allows for shooting at slower shutter speeds, thereby reducing the risk of image blur. This is particularly beneficial for telephoto photography, where camera shake can be problematic. The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III lacks such sophisticated stabilization, relying instead on its standard construction and focus adjustment method. This makes the EFS 55-250mm a better choice for photographers who frequently shoot in varying light conditions.
Focusing Mechanism
The focusing mechanisms of both lenses differ significantly. The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III uses a front group rotating extension system with a micromotor for focus adjustment. This setup may not be as responsive as the DC motor and gear-driven design found in the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II, which provides a more accurate and faster focusing experience. The closest focusing distance for the EF 75-300mm is 1.5m (4.9 ft), while the EFS 55-250mm offers a closer focus at 3.6 ft (1.1m), making the latter more versatile for capturing detailed subjects.
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is considerably more budget-friendly at $169.00. In contrast, the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II is priced at $317.59, representing about a 17% increase in cost. The price difference may be justified by the advanced features and superior optics of the EFS lens, but for those on a tighter budget, the EF 75-300mm offers a compelling choice without sacrificing too much in terms of basic functionality.
Target Audience and Use Cases
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is geared towards entry-level photographers who need a versatile zoom lens for casual shooting. Its lower price point makes it an attractive option for those who may not want to invest heavily in equipment. Conversely, the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II is aimed at enthusiasts and semi-professionals who demand higher image quality and stabilization features. This lens is well-suited for sports, wildlife, or outdoor photography, where clarity and stability are crucial.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're an entry-level photographer looking for a cost-effective lens, the EF 75-300mm at $169.00 is an excellent choice that offers good functionality for the price. However, if you're willing to invest more for advanced features, such as superior image stabilization and better optical quality, the EFS 55-250mm at $317.59 is worth considering. Each lens has its strengths, making the right choice dependent on your photography style and goals.

