Canon EF 75- vs Canon RF100-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on min focus, Canon RF100- wins on price and weight.
The Canon RF100-400mm offers superior features and versatility compared to the Canon EF 75-300mm, making it the better choice for serious photographers.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
Canon EF 75-300mm is significantly cheaper at $169.
Weight
Canon EF 75-300mm is lighter than RF100-400mm.
Beginner Friendly
Canon EF 75-300mm is ideal for amateur photographers.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Focal Length
Canon RF100-400mm has a longer zoom range of 100-400mm.
Image Stabilization
Canon RF100-400mm features advanced image stabilization.
Autofocus
Canon RF100-400mm uses faster Nano USM autofocus technology.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Canon RF100- |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/5.6-8 |
| Lens Type | Telephoto | Telephoto |
| Autofocus | Micromotor | Nano USM |
| Image Stabilization | None | Yes |
| Closest Focus | 1.5m | 2.89ft |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is significantly more budget-friendly than the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM. Priced at $169.00, the EF 75-300mm offers a more accessible entry point for photography enthusiasts. In contrast, the RF100-400mm retails for $699.00, making it about 313% more expensive. This stark price difference may influence buyers who are looking for a versatile lens without a hefty investment.
Focal Length and Versatility
When it comes to focal length, the RF100-400mm clearly outshines the EF 75-300mm. The RF100-400mm offers an impressive zoom range of 100-400mm, providing greater versatility for capturing distant subjects. This makes it ideal for wildlife and sports photography. On the other hand, the EF 75-300mm has a focal length of 75-300mm, which is still substantial but limits its reach compared to the RF100-400mm. Therefore, for those who frequently shoot at longer distances, the added range of the RF100-400mm can be a decisive factor.
Image Stabilization Features
The Canon RF100-400mm features advanced Optical Image Stabilization that allows for up to 5.5 stops of shake correction. This is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting, especially at longer focal lengths. Additionally, when paired with compatible EOS R series cameras, it can achieve up to 6 stops of stabilization. In contrast, the EF 75-300mm does not specify any image stabilization features, potentially making it less effective in low-light conditions or at maximum zoom. This difference in stabilization technology can significantly impact image quality, especially for fast-moving subjects or when shooting handheld.
Autofocus Technology
The RF100-400mm utilizes Canon’s Nano USM technology, providing high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus. This is a crucial feature for capturing fleeting moments in wildlife or sports photography. The EF 75-300mm, however, employs a front group rotating extension system with a Micromotor for focus adjustment, which may not be as fast or quiet as the RF100-400mm's autofocus system. For those prioritizing quick focus in dynamic shooting environments, the RF100-400mm has a clear advantage.
Minimum Focusing Distance
The RF100-400mm has a minimum focusing distance of 2.89 feet at 200mm, which allows for closer shots of subjects without losing detail. This is particularly useful for macro-style photography, making it versatile for various scenarios. Conversely, the EF 75-300mm has a closest focusing distance of 1.5m (approximately 4.9 feet), which is less competitive. This difference means that while both lenses can capture distant subjects, the RF100-400mm may also excel in scenarios requiring close-up detail, enhancing its overall functionality.
Build and Design
The RF100-400mm is noted for being compact and lightweight, making it a suitable option for travel and outdoor photography. The improved design allows for ease of handling during extended shooting sessions. The EF 75-300mm, while also a zoom lens, may not match the newer design features that prioritize portability and user comfort. If portability and ease of use are critical, the RF100-400mm may be the better choice for photographers on the go.
Who Are These Lenses For?
The Canon EF 75-300mm is ideal for amateur photographers or those just starting in telephoto photography. Its lower price and decent performance make it a good choice for casual use. Conversely, the RF100-400mm is tailored more towards professionals or serious enthusiasts who need advanced features like improved autofocus, image stabilization, and greater focal length versatility. Thus, the target audience for each lens varies significantly, based on experience and photographic needs.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the Canon RF100-400mm comes down to budget and photographic requirements. The EF 75-300mm is an attractive option for those seeking a cost-effective lens for general photography, priced at $169.00. However, for photographers who demand superior image quality, advanced autofocus, and excellent image stabilization, the RF100-400mm is worth the investment at $699.00. Each lens serves its purpose well, but understanding your specific needs and budget will guide you to the right choice.

