Canon EF 75- vs Sigma 18-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length, Sigma 18- wins on optical quality and weight.
The Canon EF 75-300mm offers a budget-friendly option for telephoto photography, while the Sigma 18-50mm excels in optical quality and versatility.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $169.
Focal Length
Canon provides a longer zoom range.
Durability
Canon has a robust build.
Why Sigma 18- is better
Optical Quality
Sigma offers superior optical performance.
Aperture
Sigma has a constant F2.8 aperture.
Portability
Sigma is lighter and more compact.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Sigma 18- |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal Range | 75-300mm | 18-50mm |
| Lens Elements | 13 elements | unknown |
| Weight | 1.2 lbs | 0.9 lbs |
| Compatibility | Canon | Sony E |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm and Sigma 18-50mm
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is significantly cheaper than the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN Contemporary, with a price difference of about $418.00. The Canon lens is priced at $169.00, while the Sigma lens retails for $587.00. This substantial price gap highlights the budget-friendly option that Canon offers for photography enthusiasts looking for a versatile telephoto lens.
The Canon lens is designed for broader focal lengths, ranging from 75mm to 300mm, making it well-suited for wildlife or sports photography. In contrast, the Sigma lens boasts a constant aperture of F2.8 across its focal range of 18mm to 50mm, making it an excellent choice for low-light conditions and portrait photography.
Focal Length and Versatility
When considering the focal lengths, the Canon EF 75-300mm provides a broader range, making it ideal for capturing distant subjects. With a focal length spanning from 75mm to 300mm, photographers can achieve impressive zoom capabilities, allowing for detailed shots even from a distance. This lens is particularly beneficial for wildlife photographers or anyone interested in capturing events from afar.
On the other hand, the Sigma 18-50mm offers a versatile focal range that is more suitable for everyday photography, landscapes, and portraits. Its shorter range may limit its use for distant subjects but excels in capturing wide-angle shots and tighter compositions with its F2.8 aperture. This makes the Sigma lens a great choice for those who prioritize versatility in a compact design.
Optical Quality and Performance
The Sigma 18-50mm is praised for its superb optical quality, featuring advanced technology that combines excellent performance with compactness. This lens incorporates in-camera aberration correction, ensuring that images come out sharp and clear with minimal distortions. The F2.8 maximum aperture allows for beautiful bokeh, making it a preferred choice for portrait photographers who want to achieve a soft background while keeping the subject in sharp focus.
Conversely, the Canon EF 75-300mm, while delivering acceptable image quality, does not emphasize advanced optical technology to the same extent. It is based on a simpler lens construction with 13 elements in 9 groups, which may result in less sharpness and more distortion compared to the Sigma lens. This difference in optical performance can be crucial depending on the type of photography one wishes to pursue.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens features a robust build designed for durability, but it is relatively heavier than the Sigma lens. The front group rotating extension system with a micromotor for focus adjustment may not be as smooth as the advanced focusing mechanisms found in modern lenses, which could affect the user experience during quick shoots.
In contrast, the Sigma 18-50mm is designed to be small and lightweight, making it highly portable and ideal for photographers on the go. Its compactness does not compromise its optical capabilities, allowing photographers to carry it without the burden of extra weight. This lightweight design can enhance the shooting experience, especially during long photo sessions.
Compatibility and Usage
The Canon EF 75-300mm is designed for Canon cameras, which makes it a great option for Canon users looking to expand their lens collection. Its telephoto capabilities make it particularly suited for specific types of photography, such as wildlife and sports, which require the ability to zoom in on faraway subjects.
The Sigma 18-50mm, however, is designed for E-mount cameras, making it an excellent choice for Sony users. Its versatility allows it to be used across different photography scenarios, from street photography to landscapes. The constant F2.8 aperture enables photographers to work in various lighting conditions, enhancing its usability for both amateurs and professionals.
Price Comparison
There's a significant price disparity between the two lenses, with the Canon EF 75-300mm available for $169.00, making it about 29% cheaper than the Sigma 18-50mm at $587.00. For photographers on a budget, the Canon lens represents a more accessible entry point into telephoto photography without sacrificing too much in terms of functionality.
However, the higher price of the Sigma lens reflects its advanced features and optical performance. For those willing to invest more for superior image quality and greater versatility, the Sigma lens presents a compelling option.
Target Audience
The Canon EF 75-300mm is geared towards budget-conscious photographers who need a telephoto zoom lens for occasional use. Its lower price point appeals to hobbyists and those who may not require advanced optical technology but still want to capture distant subjects effectively.
Conversely, the Sigma 18-50mm targets more serious photographers who prioritize optical quality and versatility. Its compact design and advanced features make it suitable for professionals and enthusiasts alike, especially those who shoot in varying conditions and require reliable performance.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the Sigma 18-50mm hinges on your photographic needs and budget. If you seek an economical option for telephoto photography, the Canon lens offers a solid choice at a significantly lower price. However, if you value optical excellence and versatility in a more compact design, investing in the Sigma lens may be worthwhile. Thus, both lenses serve their purpose well, but the right choice depends on your specific photography style and requirements.

