Canon EF 75- vs Tamron 17-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and focus distance, Tamron 17- wins on price and aperture.
The Tamron 17-70mm lens offers superior optical performance and advanced features, while the Canon 75-300mm is a budget-friendly telephoto option.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
The Canon lens is significantly cheaper.
Focal Length
Longer focal length for wildlife and sports.
Simplicity
Easier to use for beginners.
Why Tamron 17- is better
Optical Quality
Better image quality with advanced elements.
Build Quality
Moisture-resistant construction.
Versatility
Constant f/2.8 aperture across zoom range.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Tamron 17- |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Lens Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Zoom Ratio | 4x | 4.1x |
| Close Focus | 1.5m | 0.19m |
| Moisture Resistance | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is an ideal option for photographers seeking a versatile lens with a long focal range. Priced at $169.00, this lens offers a focal length of 75-300mm, making it suitable for wildlife and sports photography. Its construction consists of 13 elements in 9 groups, providing a diagonal angle of view ranging from 32° 11' to 8° 15'. The lens features a front group rotating extension system for focus adjustment, with a closest focusing distance of 1.5m (4.9 ft). Overall, its combination of price and functionality makes it a compelling choice for Canon users needing a telephoto option.
Overview of the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens
The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens is priced significantly higher at $599.00 but offers advanced features for Sony E APS-C mirrorless cameras. This lens boasts a constant maximum aperture of f/2.8 across its focal length range of 17-70mm, equivalent to 25.5-105mm in full-frame terms. It incorporates 16 elements in 12 groups, including two Glass Molded Aspherical elements and one hybrid aspherical element, ensuring exceptional optical performance. Moreover, the lens features Tamron's VC (Vibration Compensation) mechanism, enhancing stability, especially during video shooting. Its close focusing capability of just 7.5 inches at 17mm adds practicality for creative photography.
Price Comparison
The Canon EF 75-300mm is about 72% cheaper than the Tamron 17-70mm, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious photographers. At $169.00, the Canon lens allows users to access telephoto capabilities without a significant financial commitment. In contrast, the Tamron lens, priced at $599.00, targets a different market segment, providing advanced features and higher optical performance. This price difference suggests that while the Canon lens is suitable for those starting in photography or on a budget, the Tamron caters to professionals seeking higher quality and versatility.
Optical Performance
The optical performance of the Tamron 17-70mm lens stands out due to its advanced construction and technology. With 16 elements in 12 groups, it leverages cutting-edge design to deliver high-quality images, particularly in varied lighting conditions. In comparison, the Canon EF 75-300mm, with its simpler 13-element design, offers decent optical performance for its price range but may not match the sharpness and color accuracy of the Tamron lens. The addition of two GM lens elements and one hybrid aspherical element in the Tamron enhances its overall image quality, making it more suitable for professional use.
Focal Length Versatility
When it comes to focal length versatility, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens excels with its long-range capability, making it perfect for capturing distant subjects. The 75-300mm range is particularly beneficial for wildlife and sports photography, where photographers need to zoom in from afar. Conversely, the Tamron 17-70mm lens offers a shorter focal length range but compensates with a constant f/2.8 aperture, making it more appropriate for everyday photography, landscapes, and portraits. While the Canon lens provides more extensive zoom capabilities, the Tamron’s versatility in low-light conditions and close focusing can be advantageous for various shooting scenarios.
Build Quality and Features
The Tamron 17-70mm lens features a moisture-resistant construction and fluorine coating, enhancing its durability and usability in challenging weather conditions. These features are crucial for photographers who often shoot outdoors. On the other hand, the Canon EF 75-300mm lacks such protective features, making it less suitable for adverse conditions. Although both lenses have practical applications, the robust build quality of the Tamron lens caters to more demanding shooting environments, providing peace of mind for serious photographers.
Compatibility and Use Cases
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens is designed for Canon DSLR cameras, making it an excellent choice for existing Canon users. Its straightforward functionality appeals to beginner photographers who require a reliable lens for various scenarios. In contrast, the Tamron 17-70mm lens is specifically tailored for Sony E APS-C mirrorless cameras, incorporating features that leverage the capabilities of these systems, such as Fast Hybrid AF and Eye AF. This specialization makes the Tamron lens a better fit for photographers looking to maximize the performance of their Sony camera systems.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the Tamron 17-70mm largely depends on your specific photography needs and budget. If you are a Canon user seeking an economical telephoto option, the Canon lens priced at $169.00 provides excellent value for its versatility. However, if you own a Sony E APS-C camera and are willing to invest in superior optical performance and advanced features, the Tamron lens at $599.00 is worth the additional expense. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your photography style, preferred subjects, and investment capability.

