vsversusfinder

Canon EF 75- vs TTArtisan

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and length, TTArtisan wins on focus distance and weight.

The Canon EF 75-300mm lens is ideal for telephoto needs, while the TTArtisan 40mm excels in low-light and compact design. Choose based on your photography style.

Why Canon EF 75- is better

Versatility

Better for distant subjects with a longer focal length.

Zoom Range

Offers a wider zoom range from 75mm to 300mm.

Brand Reputation

Canon is a well-established brand in photography.

Why TTArtisan is better

Low-Light Performance

Faster f/2 aperture for better low-light shooting.

Compact Design

Lighter and more portable for travel.

Image Quality

Advanced optics reduce chromatic aberration.

Overall score

Canon EF 75-
75
TTArtisan
82

Specifications

SpecCanon EF 75-TTArtisan
Focal Length75-300mm40mm
Max Aperturef/4-5.6f/2
Weight480g176g
Min Focus Dist.1.5m0.4m
Lens Elements13 elementsED & ASPH

Dimension comparison

Canon EF 75-TTArtisan

Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and TTArtisan 40mm F2 L

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L are two distinct options catering to different photography needs. Priced at $169.00, the Canon lens is designed for versatility in capturing distant subjects, while the TTArtisan lens, at $168.00, offers a wide aperture for low-light performance and street photography. Understanding their features can help you decide which lens better suits your style and requirements.

Build Quality and Design

Both lenses exhibit high-quality build characteristics aimed at enhancing user experience. The Canon EF 75-300mm lens features a construction of 13 elements in 9 groups, which aids in delivering sharp images at various focal lengths. This lens is relatively lightweight and designed for easy handling during long shoots. On the other hand, the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L, though compact, incorporates advanced optical elements like ED and aspherical components to effectively control chromatic aberration. Weighing between 167g and 176g, it balances well on APS-C bodies, making it an excellent choice for travel or street photography.

Focal Length and Aperture

The focal length and aperture specifications of these lenses cater to different photographic styles. The Canon EF 75-300mm offers a broad focal length range from 75mm to 300mm, making it ideal for telephoto shots, wildlife, and sports photography. Its maximum aperture ranges from f/4 to f/5.6, which is suitable for daylight shooting but may struggle in low-light scenarios. Conversely, the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L features a fast f/2 aperture, allowing it to capture more light, making it significantly better for low-light conditions. Its 40mm focal length is versatile, ideal for street and documentary photography, offering a balance between subject isolation and environmental context.

Autofocus Performance

When it comes to autofocus capabilities, both lenses present unique advantages. The Canon EF 75-300mm lens utilizes a front group rotating extension system coupled with a micromotor for focus adjustments. While functional, this system may not be the fastest or most precise option available. In contrast, the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L boasts a quiet and fast autofocus system powered by an STM stepping motor, ensuring quick and accurate focusing. This makes it particularly appealing for capturing spontaneous moments in fast-paced environments.

Image Quality

Image quality is a crucial factor for any photographer, and both lenses offer distinct advantages. The Canon EF 75-300mm lens is designed for versatility but may experience some loss of sharpness at the extreme ends of its zoom range. However, it remains a reliable option for distant subjects. In comparison, the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L emphasizes excellent image quality from its advanced optical design, which combines ED and aspherical elements to minimize chromatic aberration. This lens is likely to deliver sharper images with better color fidelity, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize image quality.

Minimum Focusing Distance

Minimum focusing distance can significantly impact the kinds of shots you can capture. The Canon EF 75-300mm lens has a closest focusing distance of 1.5m (4.9 ft), limiting the ability to capture fine details in close-up photography. In contrast, the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L offers a minimum focusing distance of just 0.4m, allowing photographers to get significantly closer to their subjects. This feature is advantageous for capturing facial expressions and intricate details, especially in portrait or street photography.

Price Comparison

Both lenses are competitively priced, with the Canon EF 75-300mm retailing for $169.00 and the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L at $168.00. This places the TTArtisan lens as approximately 1% cheaper than the Canon option. Given the similar price points, the choice may ultimately come down to the specific features and performance characteristics that align more closely with your photography needs.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L boils down to your specific photography style and requirements. If you require a versatile telephoto lens for distant subjects, the Canon lens is a solid choice. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, compact design, and superior image quality, the TTArtisan lens may be the better option. Each lens offers unique features that cater to different photography needs, making either a worthy addition to your camera gear. Ultimately, your decision should reflect your photographic preferences and the scenarios in which you plan to use the lens.