Canon EF 75- vs Canon EF-S 55-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and close focus, Canon EF-S 55- wins on height and weight.
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens is a more budget-friendly option, while the EF-S 55-250mm lens offers superior image stabilization and quality.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
The 75-300mm lens is $130 cheaper.
Focal Length
Offers a longer focal length range.
Weight
Lighter at 16.8 ounces.
Why Canon EF-S 55- is better
Image Stabilization
Includes stabilization for better handheld shooting.
Close Focus
Minimum focusing distance of 2.79 feet.
Chromatic Aberration
UD lens element reduces chromatic aberration.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Canon EF-S 55- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199.99 | $329.99 |
| Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/4-5.6 |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Max Magnification | 0.13x | 0.29x |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $199.99, making it the more budget-friendly option compared to its competitor. This lens is designed for Canon SLR cameras and offers a focal length range of 75-300mm. The lens lacks image stabilization but features a smooth zooming mechanism, making it suitable for capturing distant subjects like wildlife and sports. Weighing 16.8 ounces and measuring 4.8 inches in length, it is relatively portable. This lens is ideal for photographers who need versatility without breaking the bank.
Overview of Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM
On the other hand, the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM is priced at $329.99, making it about 17% more expensive than the 75-300mm lens. This lens features image stabilization, which compensates for up to 3.5 equivalent stops of shake correction, enhancing its usability in various shooting conditions. It also includes a UD lens element designed to reduce chromatic aberration, ensuring high-resolution images with excellent contrast. Compact and lightweight, this lens is a solid choice for those who prioritize image quality and stabilization over cost.
Build and Design
In terms of build and design, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens measures 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches long, while the EF-S 55-250mm lens has dimensions of 6.7 inches in length, 4.6 inches in width, and 4.3 inches in height. The 75-300mm lens is lighter at 16.8 ounces, compared to the 55-250mm lens, which weighs 1.2 pounds. While both lenses are designed for portability, the 75-300mm offers a more compact option, making it easier to carry on long shoots. However, the design of the 55-250mm lens allows for improved ergonomics and handling, especially with its image stabilization feature.
Image Stabilization
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens does not include image stabilization, which can be a significant drawback for some photographers. In contrast, the EF-S 55-250mm lens boasts a stabilization system that corrects camera shake, making it more user-friendly for handheld shooting, especially in low light or at longer focal lengths. This feature can be critical for achieving clear, sharp images when shooting at the telephoto end of the zoom range. For photographers who often shoot in challenging conditions, the presence of image stabilization in the 55-250mm lens could justify its higher price.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon EF 75-300mm has a focal length range of 75-300mm, providing a broader zoom capability compared to the 55-250mm lens, which ranges from 55-250mm. This extended range allows for capturing subjects from a farther distance, making it excellent for wildlife and sports photography. However, the EF-S 55-250mm lens is still versatile, offering a good range for portraits and general photography. The choice between these focal lengths depends on the intended use; if you need more reach, the 75-300mm lens may be the better choice.
Close Focusing Distance
When it comes to close focusing distance, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens has a minimum focusing distance of 4.9 feet, while the EF-S 55-250mm lens allows for a minimum of 2.79 feet. This means that the 55-250mm lens is better suited for capturing close-up subjects, providing greater flexibility for macro-style shots. This feature can be particularly useful for photographers who want to explore different types of photography, including portraiture and detail shots of smaller subjects.
Price Comparison and Value
The Canon EF 75-300mm is currently priced at $199.99, while the Canon EF-S 55-250mm is available for $329.99. This price difference of $130 makes the 75-300mm lens a more appealing option for budget-conscious buyers. However, the extra features and image stabilization of the 55-250mm lens may justify the higher cost for those who prioritize performance and quality. Ultimately, the decision comes down to the specific needs of the photographer and their willingness to invest in additional features.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM largely depends on your photography style and budget. If you're looking for a more affordable option without the need for image stabilization, the 75-300mm lens offers excellent versatility at a lower price point. However, if you require superior image quality, stabilization, and the ability to shoot at closer distances, the 55-250mm lens is worth the investment. Consider your shooting conditions and preferences before making a decision, as both lenses have their unique strengths.

