Canon EF 75- vs Canon RF-S18-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and weight, Canon RF-S18- wins on max aperture.
The Canon RF-S18-45mm offers better value and versatility for everyday photography, while the Canon EF 75-300mm excels in telephoto capabilities.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Telephoto Range
Superior zoom range for distant subjects
Build Quality
Solid construction for long-term use
Brand Reputation
Established brand with a long history in photography
Why Canon RF-S18- is better
Price
Significantly lower price point
Image Stabilization
Includes optical image stabilization for better low-light performance
Portability
Compact and lightweight design for easy carrying
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Canon RF-S18- |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | 75-300mm | 18-45mm |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Autofocus Motor | DC Motor | STM |
| Best Use | Telephoto | General |
| Price | $199.99 | $87.00 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is designed for Canon SLR cameras, offering a versatile focal length range for various photography styles. Priced at $199.99, it positions itself as an entry-level telephoto option for those looking to capture sports, wildlife, or portraits from a distance. This lens features a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, which is suitable for low to moderate lighting conditions, making it a solid choice for photographers who require flexibility in their shots. Its construction includes 13 elements in 9 groups, providing decent image quality, although it lacks image stabilization.
Overview of the Canon RF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 Lens
On the other hand, the Canon RF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 Lens is a compact and lightweight standard zoom lens designed for APS-C cameras with an RF mount. Priced significantly lower at $87.00, this lens is about 57% cheaper than the Canon EF 75-300mm. It boasts a versatile zoom range of 18-45mm, making it ideal for everyday photography and suitable for various subjects. The lens incorporates two aspheric elements and Canon's Super Spectra Coating, ensuring excellent image quality. Additionally, it features optical image stabilization, which can correct up to 4 stops of shake, enhancing low-light performance.
Focal Length and Zoom Range Comparison
Focal length plays a crucial role in determining the types of photography each lens excels in. The Canon EF 75-300mm offers a substantial zoom range of 75-300mm, making it ideal for capturing distant subjects like wildlife or sporting events. This long focal length allows for dramatic compression and isolation of the subject. In contrast, the Canon RF-S18-45mm is positioned as a standard zoom lens with a range of 18-45mm, which is more suited for general photography, landscapes, and everyday use. The significant difference in focal length means that the EF 75-300mm is far superior for telephoto shots, while the RF-S18-45mm is more versatile for a variety of settings.
Image Stabilization Features
When it comes to image stabilization, the Canon RF-S18-45mm has a clear advantage with its optical image stabilization, providing up to 4 stops of shake correction. This feature is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in low-light conditions, allowing for sharper images without the need for a tripod. The EF 75-300mm, however, does not include image stabilization, which may lead to blurry images when shooting at longer focal lengths or in dim lighting. This difference can be a deciding factor for photographers who often shoot in challenging environments.
Autofocus Mechanism
The autofocus capabilities of these lenses are also noteworthy. The Canon EF 75-300mm uses a DC motor for autofocus, which is generally reliable but can be slower compared to modern autofocus systems. In contrast, the Canon RF-S18-45mm features a lead screw-type stepping motor (STM) that ensures smooth and quiet autofocus operation. This is particularly advantageous for video recording, as it minimizes background noise. The superior autofocus mechanism of the RF-S18-45mm enhances not only still photography but also video capabilities, making it a more versatile option overall.
Size and Portability
Size and weight can significantly impact a photographer's experience, especially when traveling. The Canon RF-S18-45mm is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry around without taking up much space in a camera bag. This lens fits comfortably into various settings and is ideal for on-the-go shooting. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm is bulkier, measuring 4.8 inches in length and weighing 16.8 ounces. While it offers superior zoom capabilities, its size may be a drawback for those seeking portability.
Price and Value for Money
In terms of price, the Canon RF-S18-45mm, at $87.00, is significantly more economical than the Canon EF 75-300mm, which retails for $199.99. This price difference of about $112 highlights the RF-S18-45mm's value for money, particularly for amateur photographers or those looking to invest in a versatile everyday lens. Given its advanced features like image stabilization and better autofocus, the RF-S18-45mm offers a compelling package at a lower price point. This makes it an attractive choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want high-quality performance.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Canon RF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 Lens ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you're primarily focused on telephoto photography, such as sports or wildlife, the EF 75-300mm provides the necessary focal length and versatility. However, if you require a lightweight, compact lens for everyday photography with an emphasis on portability and image stabilization, the RF-S18-45mm is the better choice. Priced significantly lower and equipped with features that enhance usability, the RF-S18-45mm stands out as a more versatile and cost-effective option for a wider range of photographers.

