vsversusfinder

Canon EF 75- vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and weight, Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weather seal and diameter.

The Canon EF 75-300mm offers versatility and affordability, while the Fujinon XF35mmF2 excels in image quality and low-light performance.

Why Canon EF 75- is better

Price

Canon is significantly cheaper at $199.99.

Zoom Range

Canon offers a versatile 75-300mm zoom.

Weight

Canon is lighter at 16.8 ounces.

Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better

Image Quality

Fujinon provides superior sharpness and bokeh.

Low-Light Performance

Fujinon has a faster maximum aperture of F2.0.

Weather Resistance

Fujinon is weather-sealed for extreme conditions.

Overall score

Canon EF 75-
70
Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
85

Specifications

SpecCanon EF 75-Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
Max Aperturef/4-5.6f/2.0
Autofocus SpeedDC motor0.08 seconds
Max Magnification0.13x0.17x
Angle of View32-8 degrees44.2 degrees
Price$199.99$449.00

Dimension comparison

Canon EF 75-Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black

Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is priced at $199.99, making it significantly more budget-friendly than the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR, which retails for $449.00. The Canon lens offers a versatile zoom range perfect for various photography styles, while the Fujinon lens excels in low-light conditions with its fast aperture. The key differences between these two lenses lie in their design, functionality, and intended use.

Design and Build Quality

The Canon EF 75-300mm features a classic telephoto zoom design, measuring 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches in length, weighing 16.8 ounces. Its robust construction is aimed at providing durability for outdoor photography. In contrast, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, ensuring protection against dust and moisture, making it suitable for extreme conditions down to 14 degrees Fahrenheit. This emphasis on weather sealing makes the Fujinon a better choice for photographers who often shoot in unpredictable environments.

Image Quality

When it comes to image quality, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR takes the lead with its maximum aperture of F2.0, which allows for superior low-light performance and smooth bokeh thanks to its nine-blade aperture. This lens is designed to deliver sharp images with rich detail, making it ideal for portraits and street photography. On the other hand, the Canon EF 75-300mm, with a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, is versatile for various subjects but may not perform as well in low-light conditions. However, its zoom capability allows for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife or sports, effectively.

Autofocus Performance

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR features an inner focus system that achieves autofocus speeds of 0.08 seconds, providing nearly silent operation. This quick and discreet autofocus makes it a great choice for candid shots or situations where noise might be an issue. The Canon EF 75-300mm, while functional, uses a DC motor for autofocus, which may not match the speed or quietness of Fujinon’s technology. The difference in autofocus performance can significantly impact the shooting experience, especially in dynamic environments.

Focal Length Versatility

The Canon EF 75-300mm offers a focal length range of 75-300mm, allowing for versatile shooting from portraits to distant wildlife. This zoom lens is particularly beneficial for photographers who need to frame subjects without physically moving closer. In comparison, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR has a focal length of 35mm (53mm equivalent in 35mm format), which is better suited for street photography and portraits but lacks the reach for distant subjects. Therefore, the choice between these lenses may depend largely on the types of photography you plan to pursue.

Close Focusing Distance

The Canon EF 75-300mm has a closest focusing distance of 4.9 feet, which allows you to fill the frame with relatively small subjects, making it versatile for various compositions. While the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR does not specify a close focusing distance as explicitly, it does offer a maximum magnification of 0.17x, which can also yield impressive close-up shots. This aspect makes the Canon lens slightly more adaptable for macro-style shots, whereas the Fujinon focuses more on delivering quality in standard portraiture and street photography applications.

Price Comparison

The Canon EF 75-300mm is listed at $199.99, which is about 56% less expensive than the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR, priced at $449.00. This substantial price difference can make the Canon lens more appealing for those on a budget or for beginner photographers who want to explore telephoto capabilities without a hefty investment. However, the Fujinon lens’s price reflects its advanced features and superior performance in low-light conditions, justifying its cost for professional or serious hobbyist photographers.

Which should you buy?

When choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR, consider your specific photography needs. If you require a versatile, budget-friendly zoom lens for a variety of shooting scenarios, the Canon EF 75-300mm is a solid choice at $199.99. However, if you prioritize image quality, low-light performance, and weather resistance, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR, despite its higher price of $449.00, offers a premium experience that is well worth the investment for more serious photographers. Ultimately, the decision hinges on your budget, shooting style, and the conditions in which you typically photograph.