Canon EF 75- vs Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and weight, Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR wins on diameter and length.
The Canon lens offers better versatility and value, while the Nikon excels in low-light performance and autofocus features.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
Canon lens is cheaper at $199.99
Zoom Range
Canon offers a 75-300mm zoom capability
Weight
Canon lens is lighter at 16.8 ounces
Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR is better
Aperture
Nikon has a faster f/1.8 aperture
Autofocus
Nikon features a Silent Wave Motor for quiet focusing
Build Quality
Nikon has moisture sealing for better durability
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Focus Motor | DC Motor | SWM |
| Filter Size | 58mm | 52mm |
| Elements | 13 in 9 groups | 8 in 6 groups |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is an excellent choice for capturing distant subjects, making it ideal for sports and wildlife photography. This lens features a 75-300mm focal length with a maximum aperture range of f/4-5.6, providing versatility for various shooting conditions. Weighing 16.8 ounces, this lens is lightweight and manageable, ensuring ease of use during extended shooting sessions.
With a closest focusing distance of 4.9 feet, the lens allows for detailed close-ups, while the improved zoom mechanism enhances the zooming experience. Although it does not feature image stabilization, it is the most budget-friendly telephoto zoom lens from Canon, priced at $199.99.
Overview of the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens is tailored for Nikon DSLR cameras, offering a fast f/1.8 maximum aperture that excels in low-light conditions. This lens is compact and lightweight, measuring approximately 70mm in diameter and 52.5mm in length, which makes it perfect for travel and everyday photography.
Despite being a prime lens, it is not zoomable, which may limit composition flexibility compared to zoom lenses. Currently, it is priced at $213.31, about 6.7% more expensive than the Canon lens, making it a solid option for photographers looking for quality and low-light performance.
Image Quality Comparison
In terms of image quality, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens provides a diagonal angle of view ranging from 32 degrees to 8 degrees, depending on the focal length. This lens is great for isolating subjects and creating dramatic effects due to its telephoto capabilities. It features a construction of 13 elements in 9 groups, ensuring sharpness across the zoom range.
On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR lens boasts a rounded seven-blade diaphragm that contributes to aesthetically pleasing bokeh in out-of-focus areas. With 8 elements in 6 groups, this lens is specifically designed to minimize aberrations, resulting in high-quality images. The superior aperture of f/1.8 allows for better performance in low light, which can be crucial for capturing detail in challenging conditions.
Autofocus and Usability
Autofocus performance differs significantly between the two lenses. The Canon EF 75-300mm uses a DC motor for autofocus, which may not be as fast or silent compared to the Nikon’s Silent Wave Motor (SWM) system. The Nikon lens allows for manual focus override and has two focus modes, M/A (manual override autofocus) and M (manual focus), providing greater flexibility during shooting.
While the Canon lens is designed with a focus on smooth zooming and ease of use, the Nikon lens prioritizes quick and quiet autofocus performance, making it suitable for both still photography and video recording. Users may find the extra features of the Nikon lens beneficial, especially in dynamic shooting environments.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon EF 75-300mm is designed for durability and practicality, featuring a straightforward design that prioritizes functionality. It measures 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches in length, making it relatively compact for a telephoto lens. However, it lacks advanced weather sealing, which could be a drawback for outdoor photographers.
In contrast, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G lens also has a robust build, with a rubber seal to minimize moisture and dust ingress around the mount. This design consideration enhances its usability in varying environmental conditions, making it a more versatile option for everyday shooting. The compact size and lightweight nature of both lenses make them convenient for photographers on the go.
Price Comparison
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is priced at $199.99, making it an economical choice for those seeking a telephoto lens. In comparison, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G is listed at $213.31. This puts the Nikon lens about 6.7% higher in price than the Canon lens. For budget-conscious buyers, the Canon option offers significant savings while still delivering quality performance.
However, the price difference may be justified for photographers who prioritize low-light performance and autofocus features over the versatility of zoom functionality. The value proposition ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G largely hinges on the type of photography you intend to pursue. If you need a versatile telephoto zoom lens for capturing distant subjects and dramatic portraits, the Canon lens is an excellent choice, especially given its lower price of $199.99.
Conversely, if you prioritize low-light capabilities and quick autofocus in a compact design, the Nikon lens is worth the additional investment at $213.31. Each lens has its strengths, so consider your specific photographic needs before making a decision.

