Canon EF 75- vs Sigma
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and max aperture, Sigma wins on min focus and diameter.
The Canon EF 75-300mm offers great value for Canon users, while the Sigma 16mm excels in low-light performance and build quality for Sony users.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
Canon lens is significantly cheaper.
Zoom Range
Canon offers a versatile 75-300mm zoom.
Weight
Canon lens is lighter at 16.8 ounces.
Why Sigma is better
Aperture
Sigma has a larger f/1.4 aperture.
Build Quality
Sigma is dust- and splash-proof.
Autofocus
Sigma features a faster stepping motor.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199.99 | $539.00 |
| Compatibility | Canon SLR | Sony E |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Focus Type | DC Motor | Stepping Motor |
| Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $199.99, making it a budget-friendly choice for Canon SLR camera users. This lens offers a versatile focal length range of 75-300mm, allowing photographers to capture everything from distant sports action to intimate portraits. With a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, it is suitable for various lighting conditions, although it does not feature image stabilization. Weighing in at 16.8 ounces, it is relatively lightweight for a telephoto lens, allowing for easy portability.
Overview of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens
The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens is significantly more expensive, retailing at $539.00. This lens is designed for Sony E mount cameras and excels in low-light situations due to its large f/1.4 aperture. It is ideal for nature and event photography, delivering impressive sharpness and clarity. The compact size enhances portability, making it easier to carry around for extended periods. Additionally, it accommodates fast Hybrid AF, which is beneficial for both stills and video shooting, though it has a minimum focusing distance of 9.8 inches.
Price Comparison
When considering the price, the Canon EF 75-300mm is about 63% cheaper than the Sigma 16mm lens. At $199.99, the Canon lens provides an entry point for beginner and budget-conscious photographers, while the Sigma lens's price tag of $539.00 reflects its advanced features and superior optical performance. For those who primarily shoot with Canon SLRs and are looking for a basic telephoto option, the Canon lens is likely to be the more attractive choice due to this significant price difference.
Performance in Various Conditions
The Canon EF 75-300mm is versatile for various photographic conditions but lacks image stabilization, which can be a drawback in low-light settings or at longer focal lengths. In contrast, the Sigma 16mm's f/1.4 aperture allows for excellent performance in low-light situations, making it an excellent option for indoor events or twilight photography. The Canon lens offers a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, which is not as effective in dim lighting, thus limiting its usability for night or indoor shots.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens features a compact design, measuring 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches long, making it relatively easy to handle. However, it does not boast weather sealing, which might be a concern for outdoor photographers. On the other hand, the Sigma 16mm lens is designed with a dust- and splash-proof construction, adding to its durability, especially in unpredictable weather conditions. This robust build quality is ideal for photographers who frequently shoot in challenging environments, making the Sigma a more reliable choice in that regard.
Autofocus Capabilities
The Canon lens uses a DC motor for autofocus, which may not be as fast or quiet as the stepping motor found in the Sigma 16mm lens. This difference is particularly noticeable during video shooting, where smooth and silent focus transitions are crucial. The Sigma lens’s autofocus capabilities enhance its usability for videography, making it a preferred choice for content creators who need quick and reliable focus adjustments.
Versatility and Use Cases
In terms of versatility, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens is suitable for a wide range of photography styles, from wildlife to sports, due to its extensive zoom range. It can fill the frame with subjects as small as a dollar bill at 300mm, which is advantageous for capturing distant subjects. Conversely, the Sigma 16mm lens, with its fixed focal length, excels in landscape and environmental portrait photography, offering a wider field of view. This specialization makes it ideal for different types of shooting scenarios, appealing to photographers focused on specific genres.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the Sigma 16mm ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. If you are a Canon SLR user looking for an affordable, versatile telephoto lens, the Canon EF 75-300mm at $199.99 is an excellent option. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, build quality, and advanced autofocus features and are willing to invest more, the Sigma 16mm at $539.00 is the superior choice for Sony E mount users. Each lens offers unique advantages, so consider your specific requirements when making a decision.

