Canon EF 75- vs Sigma 28-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and closest focus, Sigma 28- wins on weight and diameter.
The Sigma 28-70mm offers superior optical performance and versatility, making it the better choice despite its higher price.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
Canon lens is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Canon lens is lighter at 16.8 ounces.
Telephoto
Canon lens is designed for long-range photography.
Why Sigma 28- is better
Optical Quality
Sigma lens has a larger f/2.8 aperture.
Versatility
Sigma lens covers a wider focal range.
Build Quality
Sigma lens features superior construction.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Sigma 28- |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Sigma |
| Price | $199.99 | $859.95 |
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 28-70mm |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm and Sigma 28-70mm
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $199.99, making it a significantly more budget-friendly option compared to the Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN, which retails for $859.95. This price difference of about 300% reflects the distinct purposes and capabilities of these lenses. While the Canon lens is designed for long-range photography, ideal for capturing distant subjects like wildlife and sports, the Sigma lens focuses on versatility with its standard zoom range and large aperture, suitable for everyday photography.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the Sigma 28-70mm boasts superb build quality, which is notable for a lens in its class. Its lightweight and compact body is designed for ease of use, making it suitable for daily photography needs. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm, while also reasonably portable at 16.8 ounces, is primarily aimed at users seeking a telephoto experience. The Canon lens features an improved mechanism that allows for smoother zooming, but it lacks the premium feel and advanced features that the Sigma lens offers, such as internal focusing and a focus mode switch.
Optical Performance
When it comes to optical performance, the Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN excels with its large f/2.8 maximum aperture across the zoom range, allowing for better low-light performance and depth of field control. It is based on the acclaimed design of the 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN | Art, which is recognized for outstanding optical quality. The Canon EF 75-300mm, while capable, has a maximum aperture range of f/4-5.6, which may limit its effectiveness in dim lighting conditions. The Canon lens is built for capturing distant subjects but does not match the Sigma's performance in terms of sharpness and clarity, especially in challenging lighting.
Focusing Capabilities
The focusing capabilities of both lenses reflect their intended use. The Canon EF 75-300mm features a DC motor for autofocus, which is adequate for most situations but may lag behind more advanced systems. On the other hand, the Sigma 28-70mm includes a focus mode switch, enabling quick adjustments between different focusing styles, which is particularly beneficial for photographers needing versatility in various shooting scenarios. The Sigma's internal focusing mechanism also enhances its usability, allowing for faster and more reliable focusing.
Versatility and Use Cases
The versatility of the Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN is evident in its ability to handle a wide range of photography styles—from landscapes to portraits. Its 28-70mm focal length caters to both wide-angle and moderate telephoto needs, making it suitable for a variety of situations. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm is less versatile, primarily serving telephoto applications. It is ideal for sports, wildlife, and portrait photography where distance is a factor, but it may not perform as well in varied everyday scenarios compared to the Sigma.
Image Stabilization
Neither lens features image stabilization, which is a critical consideration for many photographers. The absence of this feature in the Canon EF 75-300mm means that users may experience more camera shake, particularly at its longer focal lengths. The Sigma 28-70mm, while also lacking stabilization, compensates with its faster f/2.8 aperture, which allows for quicker shutter speeds in low light situations. Thus, while both lenses may struggle with stabilization, the Sigma lens provides a significant advantage in low-light conditions due to its wider aperture.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two lenses is substantial. The Canon EF 75-300mm is priced at $199.99, whereas the Sigma 28-70mm is set at $859.95. This makes the Sigma lens approximately 330% more expensive than the Canon lens. For budget-conscious photographers or those just starting out, the Canon lens offers a more accessible entry point into telephoto photography. However, serious enthusiasts or professionals may find the investment in the Sigma lens justifiable due to its superior optical quality and versatility.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the Sigma 28-70mm ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective lens for telephoto photography, the Canon EF 75-300mm is a great choice at $199.99. However, if you require a versatile lens suitable for a variety of photographic situations, the Sigma 28-70mm, despite its higher price at $859.95, offers superior optical performance and build quality. For those willing to invest more for better quality and versatility, the Sigma lens is the clear winner.

