vsversusfinder

Canon EF 75- vs AOM Sony SELP1650 16-

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and weight, AOM Sony SELP1650 16- wins on diameter.

The Canon lens excels in zoom capabilities, while the Sony lens offers better low-light performance and stabilization.

Why Canon EF 75- is better

Zoom Range

Canon offers a longer focal length of 75-300mm.

Weight

Canon is lighter at 16.8 ounces.

Price

Canon is slightly more expensive but offers a long zoom.

Why AOM Sony SELP1650 16- is better

Aperture

Sony has a wider aperture range of f/3.5-5.6.

Image Stabilization

Sony features Optical SteadyShot for better handheld shooting.

Compact Design

Sony's retractable design makes it more portable.

Overall score

Canon EF 75-
75
AOM Sony SELP1650 16-
80

Specifications

SpecCanon EF 75-AOM Sony SELP1650 16-
Focal Length75-300mm16-50mm
Max Aperturef/4-5.6f/3.5-5.6
StabilizationNoYes
Weight16.8 oz8.5 oz
DesignStandardRetractable

Dimension comparison

Canon EF 75-AOM Sony SELP1650 16-

Overview

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Sony SELP1650 16-50mm OSS Lens cater to different photography needs, making them suitable for distinct user groups. The Canon lens is priced at $199.99, while the Sony lens is slightly cheaper at $199.96, making the Sony option about 0.02% less expensive. While both lenses offer unique features, their focal lengths and intended uses significantly differ.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon EF 75-300mm lens stands out with a focal length range of 75-300mm, ideal for capturing distant subjects such as wildlife or sporting events. This range allows photographers to zoom in significantly, providing a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6. On the other hand, the Sony SELP1650 offers a shorter focal length of 16-50mm, which translates to a 24-75mm equivalent in 35mm terms. This is more suited for everyday photography, including portraits and landscapes. The choice between these two lenses comes down to whether you need extended zoom capabilities or a versatile everyday lens.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

When it comes to aperture, the Canon lens offers a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, while the Sony lens has a slightly wider aperture range of f/3.5-5.6 to f/22-36. This means that in lower light conditions, the Sony lens can perform marginally better at its widest setting. The Sony lens’s variable aperture allows for more control over depth of field and bokeh effects. For photographers who often shoot in challenging lighting conditions, the Sony lens might provide a slight advantage.

Image Stabilization

The Sony SELP1650 features Optical SteadyShot Image Stabilization, a significant benefit for handheld shooting, especially in lower light situations or at longer focal lengths. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm does not include image stabilization. This absence may result in less stable shots, particularly at the maximum zoom range, where camera shake can be more pronounced. For users prioritizing stability and clarity in their images, the Sony lens is the clear winner in this category.

Build Quality and Design

Both lenses are designed with user experience in mind, but they cater to different aesthetics and functionalities. The Canon lens measures 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches in length, weighing 16.8 ounces, making it a relatively lightweight telephoto option. Meanwhile, the Sony lens is designed with a retractable build, making it more compact and portable, especially when not in use. The retractable design can be a significant advantage for photographers who prioritize ease of transport and storage.

Compatibility and Versatility

The Canon EF 75-300mm is specifically designed for Canon SLR cameras, ensuring seamless compatibility with Canon’s autofocus system. Conversely, the Sony SELP1650 is compatible with a wide range of Sony E-mount APS-C cameras, making it suitable for various models including the Alpha series. This broader compatibility may appeal to users with multiple Sony cameras or those considering future upgrades within the Sony ecosystem.

Price Comparison

The Canon EF 75-300mm is priced at $199.99, while the Sony SELP1650 is available for $199.96, making the Sony lens about 0.02% cheaper. This minimal price difference may not be a deciding factor for many, but it does give the Sony lens a slight edge in affordability. However, when considering the features and functionalities each lens offers, the price points reflect their distinct capabilities rather than just a number on a price tag.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the Sony SELP1650 comes down to your specific photography needs. If you require a long zoom lens for capturing distant subjects, the Canon lens is the better choice with its extensive focal length. Conversely, if you prioritize image stabilization, a wider aperture for low-light performance, and a compact design, the Sony lens may be more suitable. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, but understanding your photography style will guide you to the right decision.