Canon EF 75- vs Tamron
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and weight, Tamron wins on field of view.
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens excels in telephoto capabilities, while the Tamron 24mm lens offers superior portability and low-light performance.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Zoom Range
Canon offers a versatile 75-300mm zoom.
Telephoto
Ideal for wildlife and sports photography.
Build Quality
Robust construction typical of Canon lenses.
Why Tamron is better
Weight
Tamron is significantly lighter at 7.6 ounces.
Aperture
Tamron's f/2.8 is better for low-light conditions.
Close Focus
Tamron allows for macro-style shots at 4.7 inches.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Tamron |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Moisture Resistance | No | Yes |
| Macro Capability | No | Yes |
| Zoom Type | Rotating | Fixed |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is designed for Canon SLR cameras, offering a versatile zoom range perfect for capturing distant subjects. Priced at $199.99, this lens features a 75-300mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, making it suitable for sports and wildlife photography. It weighs 16.8 ounces, making it relatively portable for a telephoto lens, and its closest focusing distance is 4.9 feet, allowing for some close-up shots. However, it does not include image stabilization, which may affect shooting at longer focal lengths.
Overview of the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens
The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens is priced at $199.00 and is tailored for Sony full-frame and APS-C E-Mount mirrorless cameras. This compact lens weighs only 7.6 ounces and has a length of 2.5 inches, making it highly portable. With a maximum aperture of f/2.8, it excels in low-light conditions and provides beautiful background bokeh for close-up shots. Its closest focusing distance is just 4.7 inches, allowing for detailed macro-style photography. This lens is built for outdoor use with moisture-resistant construction and a dirt-repelling fluorine coating.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon EF 75-300mm has a robust build typical of Canon lenses but lacks advanced features like image stabilization. The lens is 4.8 inches long and features a smooth zoom mechanism, which is an improvement over its predecessors. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm lens is designed with portability in mind, being smaller and lighter. Its moisture-resistant construction is beneficial for outdoor photography, making it a more durable option for various weather conditions. While both lenses have their merits, the Tamron's compact and lightweight design makes it an appealing choice for photographers on the go.
Focal Length and Versatility
A significant difference between the two lenses is their focal length. The Canon EF 75-300mm offers a telephoto range, ideal for capturing distant action, making it versatile for sports and wildlife photography. This lens allows you to zoom in significantly, giving you the ability to isolate subjects from a distance. On the other hand, the Tamron 24mm is a wide-angle lens, perfect for landscapes, cityscapes, and everyday photography. It provides a broader field of view, allowing you to capture expansive scenes or tight spaces. Your choice will depend on your preferred shooting style; if you need versatility for distant subjects, the Canon lens excels, while the Tamron is perfect for wide-angle shots and close-ups.
Image Quality and Performance
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens employs a 13-element optical system, which, while effective, does not offer image stabilization. This may result in challenges when shooting at longer focal lengths without a tripod. The Tamron 24mm lens, however, uses advanced lens elements to reduce aberrations and provide sharp images across the frame, enhancing its performance in various shooting conditions. Its f/2.8 aperture also supports low-light photography better than the Canon's variable aperture. Thus, for image quality, especially in diverse lighting conditions, the Tamron lens stands out.
Price Comparison
The Canon EF 75-300mm is available for $199.99, while the Tamron 24mm lens is slightly cheaper at $199.00. This means the Tamron lens is about 0.5% less expensive than its Canon counterpart. While the price difference is minimal, the value you gain from each lens depends heavily on your specific photography needs. If you require a telephoto option, the Canon is a great deal for its price, but if you prefer a wide-angle lens, the Tamron offers excellent quality at a marginally lower price.
Target Audience
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens is ideal for photographers who enjoy capturing wildlife, sports, and distant subjects, providing versatility in framing and composition. It caters well to hobbyists and enthusiasts looking to explore telephoto photography without breaking the bank. Conversely, the Tamron 24mm lens appeals to landscape photographers, street photographers, and anyone who needs a compact lens for everyday use. It’s particularly suited for those who value portability and the ability to take close-up shots with excellent detail.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens should hinge on your specific photography needs. If you often shoot distant subjects and require a telephoto lens, the Canon offers significant advantages with its zoom capabilities, despite lacking image stabilization. However, if you're looking for a lightweight, versatile lens that excels in close-ups and wide-angle shots, the Tamron may be the better choice. Both lenses are priced similarly, making them accessible options for their respective categories. Ultimately, the best lens for you will depend on your shooting style and the type of photography you enjoy most.

