Canon EF 75- vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and weight, VILTROX wins on diameter and length.
The Canon EF 75-300mm excels in telephoto capabilities, while the VILTROX 35mm offers better low-light performance and versatility.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Telephoto Range
Longer focal length for distant subjects
Build Quality
Robust design for durability
Brand Reputation
Canon's established reputation in lenses
Why VILTROX is better
Aperture
Brighter f/1.7 for low-light performance
Minimum Focus
Closer focusing distance for detail
Autofocus
Faster and quieter autofocus system
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 35mm |
| Autofocus | DC Motor | STM Motor |
| Weight | 16.8 oz | 9.2 oz |
| Minimum Focus | 4.9 ft | 0.33 m |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm and VILTROX 35mm
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $199.99, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji comes in at $179.00, making the VILTROX about 17% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different photography needs, with the Canon lens designed for long-range shots and the VILTROX lens crafted for versatility in various photography styles.
The Canon lens offers a focal length range of 75-300mm, ideal for capturing distant subjects like wildlife or sports. In contrast, the VILTROX lens, with a focal length of 35mm, is more suited for portraits and street photography, providing a natural perspective similar to that of the human eye.
Build Quality and Design
Both lenses exhibit thoughtful design choices that enhance usability and performance. The Canon EF 75-300mm features a robust build, measuring 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches long, and weighs 16.8 ounces. Its design includes a smooth zoom mechanism and a silver ring on the zoom ring for improved grip.
The VILTROX 35mm, while more compact, emphasizes a high-quality optical design with 11 elements in 9 groups, including specialized elements to minimize chromatic aberrations and flare. Additionally, it comes with an extended lens hood, enhancing contrast and protecting against stray light, which is a thoughtful touch for outdoor photography.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The VILTROX 35mm lens stands out with its bright f/1.7 maximum aperture, allowing for exceptional low-light performance and creating beautiful background blur (bokeh). This feature is particularly beneficial for portrait and street photography, where soft backgrounds can enhance the subject.
On the other hand, the Canon lens has a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, which is less suited for low-light situations. This limitation means that while the Canon lens excels in capturing distant subjects in good lighting, it may struggle in dim environments compared to the VILTROX.
Autofocus Capabilities
Autofocus performance is another critical factor when comparing these lenses. The VILTROX 35mm is equipped with a new STM motor, delivering fast, precise, and near-silent autofocus. This feature is particularly advantageous for video recording, as it minimizes focus breathing, ensuring smooth transitions during focus changes.
In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens utilizes a DC motor for autofocus, which, while functional, may not match the speed or quiet operation of the VILTROX. This difference could be significant for those who prioritize quick and silent focusing in their photography or videography.
Minimum Focusing Distance
The VILTROX lens offers a minimum focusing distance of just 0.33 meters (33 cm), allowing photographers to capture stunning close-up shots with incredible detail. This characteristic makes it versatile for various shooting scenarios, from portraits to detailed product photography.
The Canon lens, however, has a closest focusing distance of 4.9 feet (1.5 meters), which limits its ability to capture close-up images. While it excels in distant photography, the lack of proximity capability may deter those who wish to explore macro-style shots.
Compatibility and Versatility
When it comes to compatibility, the Canon EF 75-300mm is designed for Canon SLR cameras, making it an excellent choice for Canon users seeking a telephoto lens. Its versatility shines in capturing a range of subjects from portraits to wildlife.
Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm is tailored for Fujifilm X-mount cameras, including models like the X-T1, X-T2, and X-T4. Its broad compatibility with various Fujifilm models ensures that it can meet the needs of many Fujifilm users, especially those interested in portrait and street photography.
Price Comparison
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens is priced at $199.99, while the VILTROX 35mm lens is available for $179.00, showcasing a price difference of about $20. This makes the VILTROX a more cost-effective option, particularly for photographers who may not require the long-range capabilities of the Canon lens.
Given that both lenses cater to different niches, the price difference reflects their intended use cases. The Canon lens caters to those seeking long telephoto capabilities, while the VILTROX lens appeals to photographers looking for versatility and performance in various scenarios.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the VILTROX 35mm ultimately depends on your photographic needs. If you require a telephoto lens for capturing distant subjects, the Canon EF 75-300mm is a solid choice, despite its higher price and limited low-light capabilities. However, if versatility, low-light performance, and close focusing are your priorities, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 is a more affordable option that excels in those areas. Consider your photography style and requirements to make the best choice.