vsversusfinder

Canon EF 75- vs YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 Lens Large Aperture Auto Focus

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- leads on focal length and weight.

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is better for telephoto needs, while the YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 is a budget-friendly option for portraits.

Why Canon EF 75- is better

Zoom Range

Canon offers a versatile 75-300mm range.

Build Quality

Canon has a more robust construction.

Optical Performance

Canon's lens construction delivers quality images.

Why YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 Lens Large Aperture Auto Focus is better

Price

YONGNUO is significantly cheaper.

Aperture

YONGNUO has a larger f/1.8 aperture.

Weight

YONGNUO is lighter and more portable.

Overall score

Canon EF 75-
85
YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 Lens Large Aperture Auto Focus
75

Specifications

SpecCanon EF 75-YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 Lens Large Aperture Auto Focus
Max Aperturef/4-5.6f/1.8
AutofocusDC MotorAuto/Manual
Lens Elements13 elements5 groups 6 elements
Image StabilizationNoNo
CompatibilityCanon SLRCanon EF

Dimension comparison

Canon EF 75-YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 Lens Large Aperture Auto Focus

Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $199.99. This lens offers a focal length range ideal for capturing distant subjects, making it suitable for sports and wildlife photography. With a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, it enables decent performance in various lighting conditions, although it lacks image stabilization. Weighing 16.8 ounces, it is portable for a telephoto lens, and its construction features 13 elements in 9 groups, ensuring solid optical performance.

Overview of the YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8

The YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 Lens is significantly more affordable at $82.00, making it about 59% cheaper than the Canon lens. This large aperture lens at f/1.8 is designed for versatility, providing excellent background blur for portraits. It supports both auto and manual focus modes and is compatible with full-frame and APS-C format cameras. Its compact design and lightweight construction make it an attractive option for photographers looking for an entry-level prime lens.

Optical Performance

In terms of optical performance, the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is built for zoom versatility, allowing photographers to capture subjects from a distance with a focal length range of 75-300mm. While it does not feature image stabilization, its lens construction of 13 elements in 9 groups helps in delivering quality images. On the other hand, the YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 features a simpler optical structure of 5 groups and 6 elements, optimized for low-light conditions thanks to its f/1.8 aperture. This allows for better light transmission, especially in dim settings, making it suitable for indoor photography.

Autofocus Capabilities

The autofocus capabilities differ notably between the two lenses. The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III utilizes a DC motor for autofocus, which may not be as swift or quiet as the ultrasonic motors found in higher-end lenses. In contrast, the YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 supports both auto and manual focus modes, allowing for greater flexibility in various shooting scenarios. Additionally, it features a focus distance indicator, enhancing user experience by providing information on depth of field and shooting distance.

Build Quality and Design

In terms of build quality, the Canon lens is designed with a focus on telephoto applications, measuring 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches in length. Its construction is sturdy but lacks some advanced features like weather sealing. The YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 is lightweight and compact, and while it may not have the same ruggedness as the Canon, its design includes gold-plated metal contacts that improve signal conductivity and corrosion resistance. This makes it a good choice for casual photographers who prioritize portability.

Usability and Features

The usability features differ significantly between the two lenses. The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III, while straightforward, lacks image stabilization, which could be a drawback for handheld shooting at longer focal lengths. The YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8, however, offers a versatile shooting experience with its support for M/AV/TV/P camera modes, allowing photographers to display aperture data in EXIF information. This camera compatibility enhances its usability, particularly for beginners who are learning about different photographic techniques.

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the difference is substantial. The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is available for $199.99, while the YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 is priced at $82.00. This makes the YONGNUO lens approximately 59% cheaper than the Canon lens, appealing to those on a tighter budget or those who require a more versatile lens without breaking the bank. The significant price difference highlights the YONGNUO’s value proposition, especially for beginner photographers who may not need the extensive capabilities of a telephoto zoom lens.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and the YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 depends largely on your photography needs. If you require a versatile telephoto lens for capturing distant subjects, the Canon lens is the better option despite its higher price. However, if you're looking for a budget-friendly lens that excels in portrait photography with excellent low-light performance, the YONGNUO lens is an outstanding choice. Ultimately, both lenses cater to different photography styles and budgets, making them strong contenders in their respective categories.