Canon EF-S 10- vs Canon RF 24-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 10- wins on price and video, Canon RF 24- wins on weight and versatility.
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens offers superior versatility and build quality, making it the better choice for professionals. However, the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens is an excellent budget option for hobbyists.
Why Canon EF-S 10- is better
Price
The EF-S lens is significantly cheaper.
Weight
The EF-S lens is lighter and more portable.
Video Performance
The EF-S lens has a quieter autofocus for video.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Build Quality
The RF lens is more durable with weather sealing.
Versatility
The RF lens covers a broader focal range.
Image Stabilization
The RF lens offers better shake correction.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF-S 10- | Canon RF 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 10-18mm | 24-105mm |
| Max Aperture | f/4.5-5.6 | f/4 |
| Stabilization | 4 stops | 5 stops |
| Motor Type | Stepping | Nano USM |
| Compatibility | APS-C | EOS R |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens
The Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens is an ultra-wide zoom lens ideal for photographers looking to capture expansive landscapes or architectural shots. Priced at $349.00, this lens offers a compact design and advanced features such as a stepping motor for quiet video recording and an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to four stops of shake correction. Its design is tailored specifically for EOS cameras with an APS-C sensor, ensuring high-quality images with minimal glare and aberrations.
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens
On the other hand, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens is a versatile option priced at $1,399.00. This lens features a constant f/4 maximum aperture across its focal range, which ranges from wide-angle to short telephoto. It is designed for the EOS R system and incorporates a five-stop-effective image stabilizer that helps produce sharper images in various shooting conditions. The RF lens is notable for its high-quality build and is the first L-Series lens to feature Nano USM technology.
Image Quality Comparison
In terms of image quality, both lenses excel in their respective categories. The EF-S 10-18mm lens utilizes advanced optical elements, including aspherical and UD lens elements, ensuring high-contrast and high-resolution images even in challenging lighting. It is particularly effective for landscape photography, where wide-angle shots are essential. Conversely, the RF 24-105mm lens, being part of Canon's L-series, is engineered to deliver exceptional sharpness and color accuracy throughout its zoom range. The constant f/4 aperture allows for consistent performance, making it suitable for a wide variety of photographic scenarios, from portraits to landscapes.
Build Quality and Design
When it comes to build quality, the RF 24-105mm lens stands out. As an L-series lens, it is built to withstand the rigors of professional use, featuring weather sealing that makes it more durable in adverse conditions. Meanwhile, the EF-S 10-18mm lens, while compact and lightweight, does not possess the same level of ruggedness. This difference could affect a photographer's decision depending on their shooting environment. The design of the RF lens also incorporates a control ring for direct setting adjustments, enhancing its user-friendly experience, while the EF-S lens focuses on a more straightforward operation.
Performance in Video Recording
For video recording, the EF-S 10-18mm lens is particularly well-suited due to its stepping motor technology. This feature ensures quiet autofocus, making it ideal for filmmakers looking to capture smooth video footage without distracting noise. The lens's Optical Image Stabilizer further enhances video quality by minimizing handheld shake. In contrast, the RF 24-105mm lens, while capable of video recording, may not prioritize silent operation to the same extent as the EF-S lens. However, its versatility in focal lengths allows for more creative shooting angles in video production.
Price and Value for Money
The price difference between the two lenses is significant, with the EF-S 10-18mm lens costing $349.00 and the RF 24-105mm lens priced at $1,399.00. This makes the RF lens about 300% more expensive than the EF-S lens. For hobbyists or those starting in photography, the EF-S lens presents a compelling value with its capabilities and lower price point. In contrast, the RF lens, while a larger investment, targets professional photographers seeking premium features and versatility.
Compatibility and Use Cases
The EF-S 10-18mm lens is designed specifically for Canon's APS-C sensor cameras, making it an excellent choice for users with those models. It shines in landscape and architectural photography due to its ultra-wide focal length. On the other hand, the RF 24-105mm lens is tailored for the EOS R system, offering greater versatility for various photography styles, including portrait, travel, and event photography. This broad use case makes it a staple for many professionals who require a reliable all-in-one lens.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens largely depends on your specific needs and budget. The EF-S lens is a fantastic option for those seeking an affordable, high-quality ultra-wide lens for APS-C cameras, making it suitable for landscape and video work. In contrast, the RF lens, with its extensive zoom range and professional-grade features, is geared towards serious photographers who need a versatile and robust lens for various shooting conditions and styles.

