vsversusfinder

Canon EF-S 10- vs Canon RF 75-

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 10- wins on filter size, Canon RF 75- wins on focal length and min focus.

The Canon EF-S 10-18mm lens excels in wide-angle photography and video, while the RF 75-300mm lens offers versatility for distant subjects at a lower price.

Why Canon EF-S 10- is better

Wide Angle

Ideal for landscapes and architecture

Video Focus

Stepping motor for silent autofocus

Image Stabilization

Optical Image Stabilizer for shake correction

Why Canon RF 75- is better

Price

More budget-friendly option

Telephoto Range

Versatile focal length for wildlife and sports

Compact Design

Lightweight and easy to carry

Overall score

Canon EF-S 10-
85
Canon RF 75-
90

Specifications

SpecCanon EF-S 10-Canon RF 75-
TypeWide-AngleTelephoto
Aperturef/4.5-5.6f/4-5.6
StabilizationYesNo
AutofocusStepping MotorDC Motor
Max Magnification0.22x0.25x

Dimension comparison

Canon EF-S 10-Canon RF 75-

Overview of the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is STM Lens

The Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is STM Lens is a versatile ultra-wide zoom lens designed specifically for APS-C sensor cameras. Priced at $349.00, this lens offers a unique focal length ideal for landscape and architectural photography. With a closest focusing distance of 0.72 feet, it allows photographers to capture expansive scenes with remarkable detail and clarity. The lens features a stepping motor for silent autofocus, making it particularly suitable for video shooting, where noise can be a distraction.

Overview of the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens

In contrast, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is a compact telephoto zoom lens priced at $253.95. It covers a versatile focal range of 75-300mm, which translates to an equivalent of 120-480mm on APS-C cameras. This lens is optimized for shooting distant subjects, making it an excellent choice for wildlife and sports photography. Additionally, it boasts a minimum focus distance of 4.9 feet, allowing for semi-macro shooting, which adds to its versatility.

Price Comparison

The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is about 17% cheaper than the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is STM Lens, costing $253.95 compared to the latter's $349.00. This price difference makes the RF 75-300mm a more budget-friendly option for photographers who are looking for a telephoto lens without compromising on quality. The lower price point may appeal to casual photographers and those just starting, while the EF-S lens would be more attractive to those who specifically need an ultra-wide angle for particular creative pursuits.

Build and Design

The Canon EF-S 10-18mm is designed to be lightweight and compact, making it easy to carry for travel or daily photography. It features a sleek design with a smooth finish, ensuring it is user-friendly. The RF 75-300mm lens is also lightweight, weighing just over 1 pound, which is impressive for a telephoto lens. Its compact nature and slim design with a 58mm filter thread make it an ideal choice for those seeking portability in their gear. Both lenses are engineered with high-quality optical designs, but their applications and ideal use scenarios differ significantly.

Optical Performance

Optical performance is a crucial aspect of any lens, and both the Canon EF-S 10-18mm and RF 75-300mm deliver impressive results. The EF-S lens features a combination of aspherical and UD lens elements, along with Canon's Optical Image Stabilization system, providing up to four stops of shake correction. This ensures high-contrast and high-resolution images with minimal glare. On the other hand, the RF 75-300mm employs Canon’s Super Spectra Coating to minimize lens flare and ghosting, which enhances color fidelity and contrast, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Both lenses perform well within their respective focal ranges.

Autofocus and User Experience

The Canon EF-S 10-18mm lens utilizes a stepping motor for its autofocus system, which is particularly beneficial for video shooting, allowing for smooth and silent focusing transitions. This is ideal for filmmakers looking to avoid distracting sounds during recordings. In comparison, the RF 75-300mm lens features a DC motor for autofocus, providing fast and responsive performance suitable for both still photography and video. Both lenses offer a user-friendly experience, but the specific needs of the shooter—whether videography or fast-paced photography—will dictate which autofocus system is more advantageous.

Creative Applications

The Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is perfect for capturing expansive landscapes, architecture, and even interiors, thanks to its ultra-wide angle. It can create dramatic perspectives that are often sought after in photography. Conversely, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 is tailored for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife and sports, making it an excellent choice for action-oriented photography. The ability to shoot semi-macro images at a 4.9-foot minimum focus distance adds to its creative potential, making it versatile for different photography styles.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is STM Lens and the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens ultimately depends on your photographic needs and preferences. If you primarily shoot wide-angle landscapes or architecture and require a lens that excels in video recording, the EF-S lens may be the better choice despite its higher cost. However, if you are looking for a versatile telephoto lens that is more budget-friendly, lightweight, and capable of capturing distant subjects, the RF 75-300mm is the clear winner.