Canon EF-S 10- vs Canon RF75-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 10- wins on price and compatibility, Canon RF75- wins on focal length and weight.
The Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is STM Lens offers superior image quality and video performance, while the Canon RF75-300mm provides excellent value for budget-conscious photographers.
Why Canon EF-S 10- is better
Image Quality
Superior optical design for high-resolution images
Video Performance
Stepping motor ensures quiet autofocus for video
Wide Angle
Ideal for landscape and architectural photography
Why Canon RF75- is better
Price
More budget-friendly at $239.00
Portability
Lightweight design makes it easy to carry
Included Accessories
Comes with UV filter and cleaning kit
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF-S 10- | Canon RF75- |
|---|---|---|
| Optical Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus Type | Stepping Motor | Servo AF |
| Max Zoom | 1.8x | 4x |
| Minimum Focus | 0.72 ft | 1.5 ft |
| Included Kit | None | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is STM Lens
The Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is STM Lens is a compact, ultra-wide zoom lens priced at $349.00. It is designed for Canon EOS cameras with an APS-C sensor, making it an excellent choice for landscape and architectural photography. Its optical design combines a 4 group optical zoom system with various lens elements to minimize glare and aberration, ensuring high-contrast, high-resolution images. Additionally, it features a stepping motor for quiet video recording, making it versatile for both photography and videography.
Overview of the Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens
In contrast, the Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens comes at a lower price of $239.00, making it about 31% cheaper than the Canon EF-S 10-18mm. This lens is designed for Canon EOS R series cameras and offers a remarkable focal length range from 75mm to 300mm, ideal for portraiture and wildlife photography. Its compact and lightweight design allows for easy portability, and it includes a UV filter and cleaning kit, enhancing its value proposition for photographers on the go.
Image Quality Comparison
The Canon EF-S 10-18mm excels in delivering exceptional image quality, particularly in wide-angle shots. Its advanced optical design includes a large-diameter element, an aspherical lens element, and a UD lens element, all contributing to high-resolution images with minimal distortion. The lens also incorporates Canon's Optical Image Stabilizer, which provides up to four stops of shake correction—an advantage for handheld shooting. On the other hand, while the RF75-300mm is designed to deliver quality images at longer focal lengths, specifics on its optical performance are less detailed, suggesting that it may not achieve the same level of sharpness as the EF-S 10-18mm in wide-angle scenarios.
Focusing Capabilities
Focusing capabilities vary significantly between the two lenses. The Canon EF-S 10-18mm features a stepping motor, which ensures smooth and silent autofocus, particularly beneficial for video recording. It also offers full-time manual focus, allowing for quick adjustments when needed. Conversely, the Canon RF75-300mm boasts an impressive autofocus system that includes Eye Detection at 300mm, enhancing its effectiveness for portrait photography and dynamic subjects. This feature allows the lens to focus on subjects’ pupils even in motion, making it a strong contender for action shots.
Compatibility and Mount Types
Compatibility is a crucial factor when choosing a lens. The Canon EF-S 10-18mm is specifically designed for APS-C DSLRs, while the Canon RF75-300mm is intended for the Canon EOS R series cameras. This means that if you're using a Canon DSLR, the EF-S 10-18mm is the only option. The RF75-300mm cannot be used with DSLR cameras that have EF, EF-S, or EF-M mounts, limiting its audience to those with newer mirrorless systems. This distinction is essential for potential buyers to consider based on their existing camera gear.
Portability and Size
When it comes to portability, the Canon RF75-300mm stands out due to its lightweight design. Weighing about as much as a 500ml water bottle, it is easy to carry around without feeling bulky. In contrast, while the Canon EF-S 10-18mm is compact, it may still be less portable than the RF75-300mm for those looking for a lens that can easily fit into a camera bag without adding significant weight. This makes the RF75-300mm an appealing option for photographers who prioritize portability, especially during long shoots or travel.
Value for Money
In terms of value for money, the Canon RF75-300mm offers a more budget-friendly option at $239.00. This price point is attractive, particularly considering the included UV filter and cleaning kit, which adds extra utility. The Canon EF-S 10-18mm, while more expensive at $349.00, justifies its price with superior image quality and better performance in wide-angle photography. Ultimately, the choice hinges on whether a photographer prioritizes budget or the specific advantages offered by the EF-S model.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is STM Lens and the Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens depends on your photographic needs. If you're looking for an ultra-wide lens that excels in image quality and video performance, the EF-S 10-18mm is the better choice despite its higher price. However, if you need a versatile zoom lens for portraits and wildlife photography, and you're using a compatible mirrorless camera, the RF75-300mm offers excellent value at a lower price. Consider your current gear and photography style to make the best decision for your needs.

