vsversusfinder

Canon EF-S 18- vs Canon EFS 55-

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 18- wins on weight, Canon EFS 55- wins on focal length and closest focus.

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM is the better choice for versatility and video capabilities, while the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 is II is more budget-friendly for telephoto needs.

Why Canon EF-S 18- is better

Versatility

Wider focal length range from 18mm to 135mm

Video Capabilities

Supports Movie Servo AF for smooth video

Image Stabilization

Advanced dynamic IS for better handheld shooting

Why Canon EFS 55- is better

Price

5% cheaper than the EF-S 18-135mm

Telephoto Reach

Longer focal length of 55-250mm

Lightweight

Compact design for easier handling

Overall score

Canon EF-S 18-
85
Canon EFS 55-
78

Specifications

SpecCanon EF-S 18-Canon EFS 55-
Image StabilizationDynamic IS4-stop IS
Max Magnification0.28x0.16x
Lens Elements16 elements12 elements
Focus SystemInner focusingDC motor
Zoom TypeRotatingGear-driven

Dimension comparison

Canon EF-S 18-Canon EFS 55-

Overview

When comparing the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM and the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 is II Telephoto Zoom Lens, it's crucial to consider their versatility and intended use. The EF-S 18-135mm is priced at $329.95, while the EFS 55-250mm comes in at a slightly lower price of $317.59, making it about 5% cheaper. Both lenses serve different purposes, catering to various photographic needs, and understanding their features will help you make a more informed decision.

Design and Build Quality

In terms of design and build quality, both lenses exhibit Canon's commitment to durability and functionality. The EF-S 18-135mm features an inner focusing system and a zoom ring lock to prevent accidental extension, which adds to its user-friendly design. The lens is compact, weighing 16.9 ounces, which makes it convenient for extended use. Conversely, the EFS 55-250mm is also lightweight, making it easy to handle. However, it has a more straightforward design focused on telephoto photography. While both lenses are well-built, the EF-S 18-135mm's features might appeal more to videographers due to its advanced image stabilization system.

Image Quality

Both lenses promise excellent image quality, yet they cater to different scenarios. The EF-S 18-135mm utilizes one UD and one PMO aspheric lens, which helps reduce chromatic aberration and ensures high resolution and contrast throughout its zoom range. The maximum magnification of 0.28x at the telephoto end allows for decent close-ups. On the other hand, the EFS 55-250mm incorporates 12 elements in 10 groups, including one UD-glass element, offering a focal length equivalent to 88-400mm in 35mm format, making it ideal for distant subjects. Each lens excels in its niche, but if versatility in focal length is critical, the EF-S 18-135mm might have the edge.

Autofocus Performance

The autofocus capabilities of these lenses also differ notably. The EF-S 18-135mm features a high-speed autofocus system enabled by its inner focusing design and optimized AF algorithm. This lens is particularly suited for video shooting, as it supports Canon's Movie Servo AF feature for smooth and quiet focus adjustments. In contrast, the EFS 55-250mm employs a DC motor with a gear-driven front focusing design, which is effective but may not match the speed and silence of the EF-S 18-135mm in video applications. For photographers focusing on video work, the EF-S 18-135mm is likely the superior choice.

Versatility

Versatility is a significant factor when choosing a lens, and here, the EF-S 18-135mm takes the lead. With its wide focal length range from 18mm to 135mm, it suits various types of photography, from landscapes to portraits and even videography. The lens’s image stabilization technology allows for handheld shooting in lower light conditions, making it a great all-rounder. The EFS 55-250mm, while excellent for telephoto shots, is limited to a narrower range and is best suited for subjects at a distance. Therefore, if you need a lens that can handle various situations, the EF-S 18-135mm is the more versatile option.

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Canon EF-S 18-135mm is available for $329.95, while the EFS 55-250mm is priced at $317.59. This makes the latter about 5% cheaper. While the price difference is minimal, it’s essential to consider what features you get for that extra cost. The additional features of the EF-S 18-135mm, including dynamic image stabilization and a wider focal range, may justify the higher price for users looking for enhanced capabilities. Thus, the decision may hinge on whether you value the features over the cost savings.

Intended Use

Understanding the intended use of each lens is vital for making the right choice. The Canon EF-S 18-135mm is ideal for those who wish to capture both stills and videos, particularly in diverse shooting environments. Its advanced stabilization and focus mechanisms cater to dynamic scenes and moving subjects. On the other hand, the EFS 55-250mm is perfect for photographers focused on wildlife, sports, or any scenario requiring a longer reach. If you primarily shoot distant subjects, the EFS 55-250mm might serve you better, while the EF-S 18-135mm is more suited for varied photography styles.

Which should you buy?

In summary, the decision between the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM and the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 is II Telephoto Zoom Lens largely depends on your photographic needs. If you prioritize versatility, video capabilities, and a wide focal range, the EF-S 18-135mm at $329.95 is the better option despite being about 5% more expensive. However, if your focus is primarily on telephoto photography and you want a slightly more budget-friendly option, the EFS 55-250mm, priced at $317.59, is a solid choice. Consider how you plan to use the lens, and choose accordingly.