vsversusfinder

Canon EF-S 18- vs Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 18- wins on price and focal range, Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on macro and aperture.

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm offers versatility at a lower price, while the RF35mm excels in low-light and macro capabilities. Choose based on your photography needs.

Why Canon EF-S 18- is better

Price

EF-S 18-135mm is $169 cheaper

Versatility

EF-S 18-135mm covers a wider focal range

Weight

EF-S 18-135mm is lighter at 16.9 oz

Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better

Low-Light

RF35mm has a larger aperture of f/1.8

Macro

RF35mm offers 0.5x magnification

Stabilization

RF35mm provides 5 stops of stabilization

Overall score

Canon EF-S 18-
75
Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
85

Specifications

SpecCanon EF-S 18-Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
Focal Length18-135mm35mm
Max Aperturef/3.5-5.6f/1.8
Magnification0.28x0.5x
Stabilization4 stops5 stops
Minimum Focus1.3 ft0.56 ft

Dimension comparison

Canon EF-S 18-Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black

Overview

When comparing the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, one lens offers more versatility in focal length while the other excels in low-light performance and macro capabilities. The EF-S 18-135mm is priced at $329.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the RF35mm, which retails at $499.00. Choosing between these two lenses depends on your photography style and needs.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm is a zoom lens, offering a broad focal length range ideal for various shooting scenarios, from wide-angle landscapes to close-up portraits. In contrast, the Canon RF35mm is a prime lens with a fixed focal length, which can limit versatility but can excel in specific situations like street photography and portraiture. The 18-135mm lens has a focal length that ranges from 18mm to 135mm, making it suitable for a wider range of subjects. If adaptability is what you're after, the EF-S 18-135mm has the edge.

Low-Light Performance

The RF35mm F1.8 is designed with a maximum aperture of f/1.8, making it superior in low-light conditions compared to the EF-S 18-135mm, which has a maximum aperture of f/3.5-5.6. This larger aperture allows the RF35mm to capture more light, making it a better choice for indoor or evening photography without a flash. The difference in light-gathering ability is significant, allowing for faster shutter speeds and improved performance in dim environments with the RF35mm.

Macro Capabilities

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 shines in macro photography, featuring a 0.5x magnification ratio and a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 ft (0.17 m). This makes it ideal for capturing fine details of small subjects, such as flowers and insects. The EF-S 18-135mm, while it offers good image quality, does not cater specifically to macro photography, as its maximum magnification is only 0.28x. For photographers interested in detailed close-up work, the RF35mm is the clear winner.

Image Stabilization

When it comes to image stabilization, the Canon RF35mm boasts optical image stabilization that provides up to 5 stops of shake correction. This feature is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in low-light situations, as it helps to reduce blur from camera movement. The EF-S 18-135mm also includes image stabilization, rated at up to four equivalent stops. While both lenses offer stabilization, the RF35mm provides a slight advantage in stabilizing images, especially in challenging lighting conditions.

Build Quality and Design

Both lenses are designed to be compact and lightweight, but they cater to different camera systems. The EF-S 18-135mm weighs approximately 16.9 oz, making it a robust option for those who prioritize versatility. The RF35mm, on the other hand, is also compact, designed specifically for Canon's EOS R series cameras. The RF35mm features a control ring that allows for direct setting changes, enhancing the user experience for those who prefer quick adjustments while shooting.

Price Considerations

At $329.95, the Canon EF-S 18-135mm is a more budget-friendly option compared to the Canon RF35mm, which comes in at $499.00. This price difference of about $169 makes the EF-S lens more accessible for photographers who may be just starting or looking for a versatile all-in-one solution. However, the additional cost for the RF35mm may be justified for those who require its macro capabilities and superior low-light performance.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, your choice between the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens should be informed by your specific photography needs. If you are looking for a versatile lens that can handle a variety of situations, the EF-S 18-135mm is a solid choice, especially at its lower price point. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, macro capabilities, and the unique features of the RF mount system, the RF35mm would be worth the investment. Consider what types of photography you enjoy most to make the best choice for your gear collection.