Canon EF-S 18- vs lightdow EF/EF-S 420-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 18- wins on focus speed and versatility, lightdow EF/EF-S 420- wins on price.
The Canon EF-S 18-135mm is a versatile lens with advanced features, while the EF/EF-S 420-800mm is a budget-friendly option for telephoto needs. Choose based on your specific photography requirements.
Why Canon EF-S 18- is better
Image Stabilization
EF-S 18-135mm has superior stabilization features.
Autofocus
EF-S 18-135mm offers fast and accurate autofocus.
Versatility
EF-S 18-135mm is suitable for a wider range of photography.
Why lightdow EF/EF-S 420- is better
Price
EF/EF-S 420-800mm is significantly cheaper.
Telephoto Range
EF/EF-S 420-800mm excels in extreme telephoto capabilities.
Manual Control
EF/EF-S 420-800mm allows for precise manual focus.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF-S 18- | lightdow EF/EF-S 420- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 18-135mm | 420-800mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/8.3-16 |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Focus Type | Auto | Manual |
| Build Quality | High | Moderate |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM is a versatile zoom lens ideal for both photography and videography, while the EF/EF-S 420-800mm F8.3 Telephoto Zoom Lens is tailored for professional photographers seeking extreme telephoto capabilities. The EF-S 18-135mm is priced at $329.95, whereas the 420-800mm lens is significantly cheaper at $67.99, making it about 80% less expensive. However, the functionalities and use cases of these lenses differ greatly, which influences their appeal to various photographers.
Image Stabilization Features
The Canon EF-S 18-135mm lens boasts a refined Image Stabilization system, delivering up to four equivalent stops of shake correction. This feature is particularly beneficial for shooting at slower shutter speeds or during video recording, where camera shake can be more noticeable. On the other hand, the EF/EF-S 420-800mm lens does not feature any form of stabilization, as it is a fully manual focus lens. The absence of stabilization may make the 420-800mm lens less suitable for handheld shots, especially at longer focal lengths, where stability is crucial.
Focus Mechanism
The focus mechanism is a critical aspect of both lenses. The EF-S 18-135mm incorporates an inner focusing system that enables fast and accurate autofocus, catering to users who prefer ease of use. This lens is equipped with a stepping motor, providing smooth and quiet autofocus, ideal for video. In contrast, the EF/EF-S 420-800mm lens is designed for manual focus only, allowing for precise control but requiring more skill from the photographer. This feature can be advantageous for those who prefer a hands-on approach to focus adjustment, but it may be challenging for beginners.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon EF-S 18-135mm offers a focal length range of 18-135mm, making it a versatile option for various shooting scenarios, from wide-angle landscapes to moderate telephoto shots. This lens maximizes flexibility, allowing users to capture a wide range of subjects without needing to switch lenses frequently. In contrast, the EF/EF-S 420-800mm lens has an extreme focal length range of 420-800mm, designed specifically for capturing distant subjects like wildlife or sports. While this lens excels in specific scenarios, it lacks the versatility of the 18-135mm, making it less suitable for general photography.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon EF-S 18-135mm is designed with a compact and lightweight structure, weighing approximately 16.9 oz. This makes it an excellent choice for photographers who prioritize portability and ease of use. Additionally, it features a zoom ring lock that prevents accidental extension. Conversely, the EF/EF-S 420-800mm lens is bulkier due to its telephoto design, which may result in a heavier setup. While the build quality is robust, users should be prepared for the added weight, which can make handheld shooting more challenging.
Pricing Comparison
At $329.95, the Canon EF-S 18-135mm is a more significant investment compared to the EF/EF-S 420-800mm, which is priced at just $67.99. This price difference of about $261 indicates that the 420-800mm lens is approximately 80% cheaper. However, the lower price point of the 420-800mm lens comes with trade-offs in terms of features such as autofocus and stabilization, which are available in the EF-S 18-135mm. Photographers need to weigh the cost against the functionality they require for their specific needs.
Intended User Base
The Canon EF-S 18-135mm lens is well-suited for a broad audience, including hobbyists and aspiring filmmakers, due to its user-friendly autofocus and image stabilization features. It's perfect for those who shoot both stills and videos and want a reliable all-in-one lens. In contrast, the EF/EF-S 420-800mm lens targets a niche market of professional photographers who specialize in wildlife or sports photography and are comfortable with a fully manual focus. This difference in target audience underscores the distinct use cases for each lens.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM and the EF/EF-S 420-800mm F8.3 Telephoto Zoom Lens depends significantly on your photography needs. If you require a versatile lens for general photography and videography with features like image stabilization and autofocus, the EF-S 18-135mm is the better option despite its higher price. However, if you primarily need a telephoto lens for capturing distant subjects and are comfortable with manual focusing, the EF/EF-S 420-800mm offers a budget-friendly alternative at a fraction of the cost.

