Canon EF-S 18- vs Meike

Overview of the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is a versatile zoom lens that caters to a variety of photography needs, from landscapes to portraits. Priced at $329.95, it features a refined Image Stabilization system that delivers up to four equivalent stops of shake correction, ensuring steady shots even in challenging conditions. With a focal range of 18-135mm, this lens is designed for both video and still photography, offering a maximum magnification of 0.28x.

This lens utilizes an inner focusing system and a stepping motor for smooth, quiet autofocus, particularly beneficial for video shooting. The construction includes one UD and one PMO aspheric lens to enhance image quality, reducing chromatic aberration and improving contrast. The Canon EF-S 18-135mm is a solid choice for those who seek flexibility in their shooting styles.

Overview of the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM

The Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM is a prime lens that excels in portrait photography, priced at $229.99. With its wide aperture of f/1.8 and a standard focal length of 85mm, this lens is particularly noted for its beautiful bokeh effects, making it ideal for capturing stunning portraits. The lens features a re-optimized optical design with 11 elements in 7 groups, ensuring sharpness and high resolution up to 8K.

Additionally, the Meike lens incorporates a stepping motor for silent and smooth focusing. It supports autofocus, electronic aperture adjustment, and EXIF information transmission, adding to its versatility. Overall, the Meike 85mm is a compelling option for portrait photographers looking for high-quality results without breaking the bank.

Price Comparison

When comparing the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM, the price difference is notable. The Canon lens is priced at $329.95, while the Meike lens is more budget-friendly at $229.99, making it about 30% cheaper. For photographers who are price-conscious yet still desire quality, the Meike lens offers a strong value proposition without sacrificing performance.

This price advantage may be particularly appealing to amateur photographers or those just starting out, as it allows for investment in quality glass without exceeding budget constraints. The savings could also allow for additional purchases, such as camera accessories or lighting equipment.

Versatility in Photography

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM shines in its versatility, making it suitable for various photography styles. Its zoom capability ranges from wide-angle to telephoto, allowing photographers to capture everything from expansive landscapes to intimate portraits. This flexibility is enhanced by its advanced Image Stabilization, which is especially useful for video recording.

In contrast, the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM, while more specialized, is primarily aimed at portrait photography. Its fixed focal length means it's less versatile in terms of composition. However, the quality of images produced at f/1.8 can be exceptional, making it ideal for portraiture and low-light scenarios where depth of field is critical. Each lens serves different purposes, catering to distinct photography styles.

Autofocus and Image Stabilization

The autofocus capabilities differ significantly between the two lenses. The Canon EF-S 18-135mm features an inner focusing system coupled with a stepping motor, providing fast and quiet focusing—ideal for video work where noise could be distracting. Its advanced Image Stabilization system offers up to four equivalent stops of correction, which is vital for handheld shooting.

On the other hand, the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM also utilizes a stepping motor for autofocus, ensuring smooth and silent operation. However, it lacks the robust Image Stabilization found in the Canon lens. While the Meike lens excels in sharpness and color fidelity, users might find it challenging in low-light situations without stabilization, particularly at longer shutter speeds.

Build Quality and Portability

In terms of build quality and portability, the Canon EF-S 18-135mm is designed with a focus on durability and usability. Its inner focusing system contributes to a compact size that is still robust enough for regular use. Weighing 16.9 oz, it strikes a balance between sturdiness and ease of use, making it a suitable companion for long shooting sessions.

Conversely, the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM is lightweight and compact, making it easy to carry around. The lens benefits from fingerprint- and oil-resistant coatings on both the front and rear elements, enhancing its usability in diverse shooting environments. While both lenses are portable, the choice may come down to whether a photographer prioritizes zoom versatility or the specialized quality of a prime lens.

Target Audience

The target audience for each lens varies based on their specific features. The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is ideal for beginner to intermediate photographers seeking an all-in-one solution for various shooting scenarios. Its versatility makes it a good choice for those who enjoy both stills and video.

On the other hand, the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM is tailored for portrait photographers and enthusiasts who value the artistry of bokeh and sharpness. This lens would appeal to those focused on creating high-quality portraits or those working in low-light conditions. Depending on the photographer's needs, either lens can be a valuable addition to their toolkit.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you require versatility for various types of photography and video, the Canon lens offers a broader focal range and superior stabilization features, making it the better option for diverse shooting scenarios. However, if you're focused primarily on portrait photography and prefer a lens that delivers stunning image quality with beautiful bokeh, the Meike lens stands out as a more affordable choice. With a price difference of about $99, the decision hinges on whether you prioritize versatility or specialized performance.