vsversusfinder

Canon EF-S 18- vs Sigma 17-

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 18- wins on price and versatility, Sigma 17- wins on build and image quality.

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm offers great versatility and affordability, while the Sigma 17-40mm excels in low-light performance and image quality.

Why Canon EF-S 18- is better

Price

Canon is significantly cheaper at $329.95.

Versatility

Canon has a wider focal range of 18-135mm.

Autofocus

Canon features high-speed autofocus suitable for video.

Why Sigma 17- is better

Aperture

Sigma has a constant F1.8 aperture for low-light shooting.

Build Quality

Sigma is part of the Art series, emphasizing professional quality.

Image Quality

Sigma delivers sharp detail and professional image quality.

Overall score

Canon EF-S 18-
85
Sigma 17-
78

Specifications

SpecCanon EF-S 18-Sigma 17-
Focal Length18-135mm17-40mm
Max Aperturef/3.5-5.6f/1.8
StabilizationYesNo
Weight16.9 ozNot specified
Focus TypeInnerNot specified

Dimension comparison

Canon EF-S 18-Sigma 17-

Overview of Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM and Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM is priced at $329.95, while the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC is significantly more expensive at $919.00, making the Sigma lens about 178% pricier than the Canon. Both lenses cater to different photography needs, with the Canon designed for versatility in capturing both still images and video, and the Sigma targeting professional photographers seeking high-quality optics and low-light performance.

Build Quality and Design

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm features a refined Image Stabilization system that enhances stability during shooting, which is particularly beneficial for handheld video. It incorporates an inner focusing system that contributes to its compact design. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm boasts an Art-series build, emphasizing professional image quality and sharp detail. While the Canon lens weighs 16.9 oz, the Sigma's precise weight isn't specified, but its premium build suggests a robust construction.

Image Quality

Both lenses promise exceptional image quality, but they achieve this in different ways. The Canon lens incorporates one UD and one PMO aspheric lens to reduce chromatic aberration and ensure high contrast images. This setup makes it versatile for various shooting conditions. The Sigma, on the other hand, features a bright F1.8 constant aperture, making it particularly adept in low-light situations and allowing for creative depth effects. This difference in aperture size may give the Sigma an edge for portraiture and artistic photography.

Versatility and Focal Range

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm has a focal length range from 18mm to 135mm, making it a highly versatile option for capturing everything from wide landscapes to close-up portraits. This extensive range is particularly useful for travel photography. The Sigma, with its shorter range of 17mm to 40mm, is less versatile in terms of zoom but excels in its ability to deliver sharp images, ideal for specific scenarios like portrait and travel photography.

Autofocus Performance

The Canon lens features high-speed autofocus facilitated by its inner focusing system and optimized AF algorithm, making it suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects in both video and still images. The Sigma also aims to attract photographers with its sharp detail and professional quality, although specific autofocus performance metrics are not highlighted in the provided data. For videographers and those who shoot action, the Canon may offer an advantage with its smoother and quieter autofocus capabilities.

Price Comparison

With the Canon EF-S 18-135mm priced at $329.95 and the Sigma 17-40mm at $919.00, there’s a substantial price difference of $589.05. This makes the Canon lens about 36% cheaper than the Sigma. For photographers on a budget or those just starting, the Canon offers a compelling value without sacrificing quality, while the Sigma may appeal to professionals willing to invest more for specific performance benefits.

Intended Use and Target Audience

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm is designed for a broad audience, including amateur photographers and videographers looking for an all-in-one lens solution that excels in various conditions. It targets those who appreciate the convenience of a versatile zoom lens. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC appeals to serious enthusiasts and professionals who prioritize image quality and low-light performance, making it ideal for studio work, portraits, and travel.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM and the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you seek versatility and affordability, the Canon lens is the clear winner at $329.95. However, if your focus is on professional-grade optics and you frequently shoot in low-light conditions, the Sigma, despite its higher price of $919.00, could be worth the investment. Each lens has its strengths, making it essential to align your choice with your photography style and requirements.