vsversusfinder

Canon EF-S 18- vs Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 18- wins on max aperture, Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony wins on focal length and weight.

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm offers great value and versatility for Canon users, while the Tamron 28-200mm excels in low-light performance and broader focal range for Sony users.

Why Canon EF-S 18- is better

Price

Canon lens is significantly cheaper at $329.95.

Weight

Canon lens is lighter at 16.9 oz.

Video Features

Canon lens has specific adaptations for video shooting.

Why Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony is better

Aperture

Tamron lens has a faster maximum aperture of F2.8.

Zoom Range

Tamron lens covers a broader focal length of 28-200mm.

Build Quality

Tamron lens features moisture-resistant construction.

Overall score

Canon EF-S 18-
75
Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony
85

Specifications

SpecCanon EF-S 18-Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony
Image StabilizationYesYes
Autofocus TypeStepping MotorRXD Stepping Motor
Closest Focus1.3 ft7.5 in
Lens Elements16 elements15 elements
ConstructionStandardMoisture-Resistant

Dimension comparison

Canon EF-S 18-Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony

Overview of the Canon EF-S 18-135mm and Tamron 28-200mm

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM is priced at $329.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6, which retails for $699.00. This price difference is significant, especially for photographers looking for value. Both lenses offer unique features catering to different photography styles and requirements, making it essential to compare their attributes before making a purchase.

Design and Build Quality

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm features a compact design, weighing 16.9 oz. and measuring 3.1 x 3.8 inches, making it lightweight and easy to handle. It includes a zoom ring lock that prevents accidental extension, enhancing portability. In contrast, the Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 is also lightweight at 20.3 oz. but offers a more compact length of 4.6 inches. The Tamron lens boasts a moisture-resistant construction and fluorine coating, providing additional protection, particularly in challenging weather conditions. While both lenses prioritize mobility, the Tamron's added durability may appeal to outdoor photographers.

Optical Performance

The optical performance of the Canon EF-S 18-135mm is reinforced by its refined Image Stabilization system, delivering up to four stops of shake correction throughout its zoom range. It features a combination of one UD and one PMO aspheric lens, ensuring high-resolution images with reduced chromatic aberration. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-200mm is noted for its fast maximum aperture of F2.8 at 28mm, which enhances its performance in low-light conditions. This lens utilizes a precise arrangement of special lens elements designed for high-quality rendering across the zoom range, making it a strong contender for photographers seeking versatility and quality.

Focal Length and Zoom Range

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm offers a versatile zoom range from 18mm to 135mm, suitable for a wide array of shooting scenarios, from landscapes to portraits. It provides a maximum magnification of 0.28x at the telephoto end, allowing for decent close-up shots. Conversely, the Tamron 28-200mm covers a broader focal length range from 28mm to 200mm, making it an all-in-one solution ideal for travel and general photography. The ability to achieve a maximum aperture of F2.8 at the wide-angle end adds to its flexibility, especially for photographers who often shoot in variable lighting conditions.

Autofocus and Shooting Experience

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm is equipped with an inner focusing system and a stepping motor for smooth and quiet autofocus, particularly advantageous for video shooting. Additionally, it supports the Movie Servo AF feature of Canon’s EOS Rebel T4i DSLR, enhancing its functionality for filmmakers. The Tamron 28-200mm also features an RXD stepping motor unit that is exceptionally quiet, catering to both stills and video applications. The autofocus performance in both lenses is designed to be efficient and unobtrusive, but the Canon's specific adaptations for video may provide an edge for those prioritizing videography.

Practical Applications

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm is ideal for those using Canon’s crop sensor cameras, particularly for hybrid shooters who want a lens that performs well for both photography and videography. Its lightweight design and effective image stabilization make it suitable for handheld shooting in various situations. In contrast, the Tamron 28-200mm appeals to Sony full-frame and APS-C mirrorless camera users, offering a versatile solution for diverse photography styles, from landscapes to portraits and wildlife. The larger zoom range coupled with a fast maximum aperture makes the Tamron lens an attractive option for photographers looking to minimize gear while maximizing creative potential.

Price and Value

At $329.95, the Canon EF-S 18-135mm offers a compelling price point, especially considering its range of features tailored for video and photography. In contrast, the Tamron 28-200mm is priced at $699.00, reflecting its advanced capabilities and broader focal range. The price difference of approximately $369.05 may be justified for users who require a fast aperture and superior optical performance. However, for those who primarily shoot with Canon’s crop sensor cameras, the Canon lens represents a great value without sacrificing too much in terms of performance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is STM and the Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 largely depends on your camera system and shooting preferences. If you prioritize a lightweight, versatile lens for a Canon crop sensor body, the Canon lens at $329.95 is an excellent choice. However, if you are using a Sony full-frame or APS-C mirrorless camera and require the flexibility of a broader zoom range and a faster maximum aperture, the Tamron lens at $699.00 may be worth the investment. Ultimately, both lenses excel in their respective categories, catering to different needs in the photography landscape.