Canon EF-S 55- vs Canon RF 24-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 55- wins on max focal and min focal, Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and weight.
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM lens offers superior versatility and image stabilization compared to the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM. For those prioritizing performance, the RF lens is the better choice.
Why Canon EF-S 55- is better
Price
EF-S lens is $146.96 cheaper
Telephoto
Better for distant subjects with 250mm focal length
Weight
Lighter at 1.2 lbs compared to RF lens
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Versatility
Covers 24mm to 105mm for various photography styles
Stabilization
Offers 5 stops of image stabilization
Autofocus
Quieter and smoother autofocus for video
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF-S 55- | Canon RF 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $329.99 | $476.95 |
| Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/4-7.1 |
| Image Stabilization | 3.5 stops | 5 stops |
| Autofocus Type | STM | STM |
| Macro Focus | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM
The Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM is a telephoto zoom lens designed for Canon's EF-S mount cameras. It is priced at $329.99 and offers a versatile focal range from 55mm to 250mm, making it suitable for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife and sports. Its compact and lightweight design, combined with image stabilization, enhances the shooting experience, allowing for clearer images even in challenging conditions. With features like a UD lens element to reduce chromatic aberration and a minimum focusing distance of 2.79 feet, this lens is a solid choice for enthusiasts seeking quality without a hefty investment.
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM lens is a versatile standard zoom lens aimed at users of Canon's full-frame RF-mount cameras. Priced at $476.95, it covers a broader focal length range from 24mm to 105mm, making it ideal for everyday photography, travel, and video creation. This lens boasts an impressive five stops of optical image stabilization, allowing for smoother shooting in low-light situations. It includes features such as a dedicated Center Macro Focus position for close-up shots and a configurable Control Ring for quick adjustments, making it a practical option for photographers and videographers alike.
Price Comparison
The Canon EF-S 55-250mm is significantly cheaper than the Canon RF 24-105mm, with a price difference of $146.96. At $329.99, the EF-S lens is about 31% less expensive than the RF lens, which retails for $476.95. For budget-conscious consumers, this price difference might be a critical factor, especially if they are still exploring their photography skills and do not want to make a large financial commitment. The lower price of the EF-S lens does not compromise its quality, but those seeking more versatility might find the investment in the RF lens worthwhile.
Image Stabilization Features
Both lenses offer image stabilization, but they differ in effectiveness. The EF-S 55-250mm provides up to 3.5 stops of shake correction, while the RF 24-105mm boasts an impressive five stops. This means that the RF lens is better equipped for handheld shooting in low-light conditions or at longer focal lengths, where camera shake is more pronounced. The advanced stabilization in the RF lens enhances sharpness for still images and produces smoother video footage, making it a better choice for videographers or anyone who often shoots in challenging lighting.
Focal Length Versatility
The versatility in focal lengths is a significant difference between the two lenses. The EF-S 55-250mm offers a telephoto range that is excellent for distant subjects, providing an impressive maximum magnification of 0.29x. In contrast, the RF 24-105mm covers a broader range from wide-angle to short telephoto, making it suitable for various photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and even macro shots with its 1:2 maximum magnification. This flexibility in the RF lens allows photographers to shoot a wider variety of scenes without needing to change lenses, an essential feature for travel and street photography.
Autofocus Performance
Autofocus capabilities are crucial for both lenses but differ in execution. The Canon RF 24-105mm uses a smooth STM stepping motor that provides quiet and precise autofocus, which is particularly beneficial for video recording. This allows for natural focus transitions, making it an excellent choice for content creators who need to capture smooth video. Meanwhile, the EF-S 55-250mm also includes fast and silent autofocus but may not match the RF lens's performance in dynamic video scenarios. For photographers prioritizing video, the RF lens may offer a distinct advantage.
Build and Design
When it comes to design, the Canon RF 24-105mm is notably compact and lightweight, making it comfortable for extended use. It includes thoughtful features like a configurable Control Ring for quick adjustments, enhancing usability during shoots. The EF-S 55-250mm, while also compact, is designed primarily as a telephoto lens and may not offer the same level of convenience for varied shooting conditions. The RF lens's design caters specifically to everyday photographers and videographers, blending functionality with ease of use.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM lens ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that excels in telephoto capabilities, the EF-S lens is a strong contender at $329.99. However, if you prioritize versatility, superior image stabilization, and excellent autofocus for both photography and video, the RF lens is worth the additional investment at $476.95. Ultimately, consider your shooting style and requirements before making a decision.

