vsversusfinder

Canon EF-S 55- vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 55- wins on focal length and length, VILTROX wins on aperture.

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm offers versatility for various subjects, while the VILTROX 35mm excels in low-light performance and affordability.

Why Canon EF-S 55- is better

Zoom Range

Versatile focal length of 55-250mm.

Image Stabilization

Effective stabilization for sharp images.

Brand Reputation

Canon is a well-established brand in photography.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

Significantly cheaper at $179.00.

Low-Light Performance

Bright f/1.7 aperture for better low-light shots.

Compact Design

Lightweight at 170 grams, ideal for portability.

Overall score

Canon EF-S 55-
75
VILTROX
85

Specifications

SpecCanon EF-S 55-VILTROX
Aperturef/4-5.6f/1.7
Focal Length55-250mm35mm
AutofocusStandardFast & Silent
Image StabilizationYesNo
Build QualityGoodExcellent

Dimension comparison

Canon EF-S 55-VILTROX

Overview of Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM and VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM is a telephoto zoom lens, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E is a prime lens designed for Sony E-mount cameras. The Canon lens is priced at $329.99, and the VILTROX lens is about 46% cheaper at $179.00. This price difference signifies a significant consideration for photographers on a budget.

The Canon lens is ideal for those who need versatility in framing subjects from a distance, making it suitable for wildlife and sports photography. In contrast, the VILTROX lens is tailored for low-light conditions and offers a shallow depth of field, perfect for portrait and street photography. Each lens serves distinct photographic needs, emphasizing the importance of choosing based on shooting style.

Design and Build Quality

In terms of design, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E stands out with its compact and lightweight design, weighing only 170 grams. This makes it an excellent choice for photographers who prioritize portability. The Canon EF-S 55-250mm, while still lightweight at 1.2 lbs, is bulkier due to its zoom capability.

Both lenses are built for durability, with the VILTROX featuring a sleek metal body that enhances its longevity. The Canon lens, although less compact, boasts a six-group zoom system that allows for a wide focal length range of 55-250mm. This versatility makes it suitable for various photography styles, from close-ups to distant subjects.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E excels in low-light situations thanks to its bright f/1.7 aperture, allowing for exceptional background blur and bokeh. This feature is particularly beneficial for portrait photography, where isolating the subject is crucial.

On the other hand, the Canon EF-S 55-250mm has a variable aperture of f/4 to f/5.6, which is less effective in low-light conditions. While it does provide good image stabilization and can capture sharp images, it falls short compared to the VILTROX's low-light capabilities. This difference in aperture design highlights the VILTROX’s advantage for indoor and evening shoots.

Autofocus and Shooting Experience

When it comes to autofocus performance, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E is equipped with a new STM motor that delivers fast and near-silent autofocus. This feature is particularly advantageous for video recording, as it minimizes focus breathing, ensuring smooth transitions between subjects.

Conversely, while the Canon EF-S 55-250mm does have image stabilization and fast focusing, its autofocus system is generally less advanced compared to the VILTROX. The ability to maintain focus during video shoots gives the VILTROX a distinct edge, especially for content creators working with video.

Image Quality

Image quality is a crucial aspect of any lens, and both the Canon EF-S 55-250mm and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E offer impressive optical performance. The Canon lens features one UD lens element that significantly reduces chromatic aberration, ensuring high-resolution and contrast images throughout its zoom range.

In comparison, the VILTROX lens includes 11 elements in 9 groups, with high refractive and aspherical elements that minimize distortion and flare. This optimized optical design allows for sharp, vivid images across different photography styles. For photographers seeking exceptional image quality, both lenses provide strong performance, with the VILTROX lens offering a slight edge in versatility due to its large aperture.

Focal Length and Versatility

The focal length difference between the two lenses is significant. The Canon EF-S 55-250mm provides a focal length range that is versatile for various subjects, from distant wildlife to close-up sports shots. This flexibility makes it a go-to choice for photographers who need to adapt to different shooting scenarios.

In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E has a fixed focal length of 35mm, which offers a natural perspective akin to the human eye. This is ideal for portrait and street photography, where a more intimate framing is often required. However, it may not be the best choice for subjects that require a greater zoom range. Photographers will need to consider their primary shooting style when choosing between these two focal length approaches.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two lenses is quite pronounced, making the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E the more budget-friendly option at $179.00 compared to the Canon EF-S 55-250mm, which retails at $329.99. This represents a savings of about 46%, which can be a deciding factor for many photographers, particularly those just starting or looking to expand their lens collection without breaking the bank.

Both lenses offer great value for their respective prices, but the VILTROX's affordability combined with its features makes it a compelling choice for those who may not need the extensive zoom range of the Canon lens.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E largely depends on your photography needs. If you require a versatile zoom lens for a variety of subjects, the Canon lens is a strong contender. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, portrait capabilities, and a significantly lower price point, the VILTROX lens is an excellent choice. Both lenses provide unique advantages, making your specific use case the ultimate deciding factor.