vsversusfinder

Canon EFS 55- vs Canon RF 24-

Updated July 2026 — Canon EFS 55- wins on price and focal length, Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and weight.

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM offers superior build quality and optical performance, making it the better choice for professionals.

Why Canon EFS 55- is better

Price

EFS lens is significantly cheaper at $317.59

Weight

EFS lens is lighter and more portable

Focal Length

EFS lens offers a longer telephoto range

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Build Quality

RF lens is part of Canon's L-Series with premium construction

Optical Performance

RF lens has a constant f/4 aperture and advanced stabilization

Compatibility

RF lens is compatible with full-frame EOS R system

Overall score

Canon EFS 55-
70
Canon RF 24-
90

Specifications

SpecCanon EFS 55-Canon RF 24-
Aperturef/4-5.6f/4
Zoom Range55-250mm24-105mm
Image Stabilization4 stops5 stops
Motor TypeDC MotorNano USM
Closest Focus3.6 ft1.48 ft

Dimension comparison

Canon EFS 55-Canon RF 24-

Overview

When comparing the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 is II Telephoto Zoom Lens with the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens, distinct features and pricing set them apart. The former is priced at $317.59, while the latter commands a higher price of $1,399.00, making the RF lens about 340% more expensive than the EFS lens. This significant price difference indicates that each lens caters to different user needs and budgets.

Design and Build Quality

The design and build quality of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens is superior to that of the Canon EFS 55-250mm lens. The RF lens is part of Canon's L-Series, known for its high-quality construction and optical performance. It features a compact design and a control ring that allows for direct setting changes, enhancing usability. On the other hand, the EFS 55-250mm is designed to be lightweight and compact, making it user-friendly for those on the go, but it does not carry the premium build quality associated with L-Series lenses.

Optical Performance

In terms of optical performance, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM offers a constant f/4 maximum aperture across its zoom range, which is beneficial for consistent exposure settings. It also includes a five-stop-effective image stabilizer to reduce the effects of camera shake, resulting in sharper images. The EFS 55-250mm lens, while offering a versatile focal length of 55-250mm with a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, lacks the constant aperture and advanced stabilization features of the RF lens, making the latter a more robust choice for professional photography.

Focal Length Versatility

The focal length versatility of these lenses is a significant point of differentiation. The Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 lens provides a focal length equivalent of 88-400mm in 35mm format, making it ideal for telephoto photography such as wildlife or sports. Conversely, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L offers a more moderate zoom range from 24mm to 105mm, which is suitable for a broader range of photography styles from landscapes to portraits. This flexibility makes the RF lens a better all-around option for photographers who require various framing options.

Compatibility

Compatibility is essential to consider when selecting a lens. The Canon EFS 55-250mm is specifically designed for Canon digital SLR cameras that use the EF-S lens mount, limiting its use to cameras with APS-C sensors. In contrast, the Canon RF 24-105mm is designed for the EOS R system, which includes full-frame cameras, offering compatibility with a more extensive range of modern Canon cameras. This distinction is critical for photographers looking to invest in future-proof equipment.

Price Comparison

When examining price, the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 is II lens is priced at $317.59, while the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM lens is significantly more expensive at $1,399.00. This price difference of about $1,081.41 means that the EFS lens is roughly 77% cheaper than the RF model. For casual photographers or those on a budget, the EFS lens presents a much more accessible option, while professionals may find the investment in the RF lens justifiable for its advanced features.

User Experience

User experience can greatly differ between these two lenses. The Canon EFS 55-250mm lens incorporates a DC Motor for focus adjustment and offers a closest focusing distance of 3.6 feet, which is beneficial for capturing distant subjects. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a Nano USM motor, providing fast and silent focusing, which enhances the shooting experience, particularly in dynamic environments. The more advanced features of the RF lens cater to professional needs, while the EFS lens provides a straightforward, user-friendly experience for beginners.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 is II Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. If you’re a casual photographer looking for a versatile and affordable lens for telephoto photography, the EFS 55-250mm is an excellent choice at $317.59. However, if you’re a professional or serious enthusiast seeking high-quality optics and advanced features, the RF 24-105mm, despite its higher price of $1,399.00, provides significant advantages in build quality and performance. Your decision should be aligned with your photography goals and the type of equipment you currently own.