Canon EFS 55- vs Canon RF24-

Overview

When comparing the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM lens, the first key takeaway is that they cater to different user needs and camera systems. The EFS 55-250mm is designed for Canon's EF-S mount cameras, while the RF24-105mm is compatible with RF mount cameras. This difference significantly impacts their target users and applications.

The EFS 55-250mm lens is priced at $317.59, making it approximately 31% cheaper than the RF24-105mm, which costs $459.00. This price difference reflects their design and intended use, with the EFS lens being a more entry-level option for APS-C sensor users, while the RF lens targets full-frame users seeking versatility.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon RF24-105mm offers a broader focal length range compared to the EFS 55-250mm. The RF24-105mm covers a versatile zoom range from 24mm to 105mm, while the EFS 55-250mm zooms from 55mm to 250mm. This 24-105mm range is particularly beneficial for capturing diverse subjects, from landscapes to portraits, making it ideal for travel and general photography.

The EFS lens, with its focal length equivalent of 88-400mm in 35mm terms, excels in capturing distant subjects, which is suitable for wildlife and sports photography. However, the RF lens's wider angle at 24mm makes it a more versatile choice for users who want to shoot a wider variety of scenes without the need for multiple lenses.

Image Stabilization

Both lenses feature image stabilization, but they differ in effectiveness. The EFS 55-250mm includes Canon's 4-stop compensation Image Stabilizer, which allows for slower shutter speeds without increasing image blur. In contrast, the RF24-105mm boasts optical image stabilization rated up to 5 stops, providing enhanced shake correction.

For photographers who frequently shoot in low-light conditions or at slower shutter speeds, the RF24-105mm’s superior stabilization may result in clearer images. This additional stop of stabilization can be critical when capturing handheld shots, especially when using longer focal lengths.

Autofocus System

The autofocus system in the Canon RF24-105mm is likely to offer a smoother experience due to its leadscrew-type STM motor. This technology provides quick and quiet autofocus, which is particularly beneficial for video recording. The EFS 55-250mm utilizes a DC motor for focus adjustment, which may not deliver the same level of performance, particularly in terms of speed and noise.

For videographers and photographers who need to capture moving subjects silently, the RF24-105mm's autofocus system is an advantage. However, for general photography, the EFS lens still provides adequate autofocus performance for most shooting situations.

Close Focusing Capability

The RF24-105mm lens stands out with its impressive close focusing capabilities, featuring a minimum focusing distance of 0.66 feet in auto focus and 0.43 feet when using Center Focus Macro. This enables photographers to capture detailed macro images from very close distances.

In comparison, the EFS 55-250mm has a closest focusing distance of 3.6 feet. This difference means that while the EFS lens is excellent for distant subjects, it falls short for macro photography enthusiasts who may prefer the RF24-105mm for its versatility in capturing both general and close-up shots.

Build Quality and Portability

Both lenses are designed to be compact and lightweight, catering to photographers looking for portability. However, the RF24-105mm is part of Canon’s RF lens series, which often emphasizes higher build quality and advanced optics compared to the more basic EF-S line.

The EFS 55-250mm is a good choice for those seeking an affordable, lightweight option without demanding high-end features. Conversely, the RF24-105mm, while heavier and more expensive, offers superior optics and performance, making it a more robust option for serious photographers.

Price and Value

The Canon EFS 55-250mm is priced at $317.59, which is significantly lower than the RF24-105mm’s price of $459.00. This makes the EFS lens about 31% cheaper, appealing to budget-conscious photographers who still desire quality performance without breaking the bank.

However, the price difference reflects their target markets. The EFS lens serves as an excellent entry point for those using APS-C cameras, while the RF lens, despite its higher cost, provides advanced features and versatility for full-frame camera users, ultimately delivering greater long-term value for serious photographers.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EFS 55-250mm and the Canon RF24-105mm largely depends on your camera system and photography needs. If you own a Canon camera with an EF-S mount and are looking for an affordable telephoto lens, the EFS 55-250mm is a solid choice. It offers good performance for wildlife and sports photography at a reasonable price.

On the other hand, if you have a full-frame Canon camera and require a versatile lens for various photography styles, the RF24-105mm is worth the investment. Its superior image stabilization, autofocus system, and close focusing capabilities make it ideal for both photography and videography. Ultimately, the decision hinges on your specific requirements and camera compatibility.