vsversusfinder

Canon EFS 55- vs Sigma 17-

Updated July 2026 — Canon EFS 55- wins on focal length and zoom range, Sigma 17- wins on price and weight.

The Canon EFS 55-250mm offers great value and versatility for casual photographers, while the Sigma 17-40mm excels in low-light performance and image quality. Ultimately, the choice depends on specific photography needs.

Why Canon EFS 55- is better

Price

Canon is significantly cheaper at $317.59.

Weight

Canon is lighter, making it more portable.

Zoom Range

Canon offers a longer zoom range for distant subjects.

Why Sigma 17- is better

Aperture

Sigma has a constant F1.8 aperture for low-light shooting.

Optics

Sigma's Art-series optics provide superior image quality.

Build Quality

Sigma is built for professional use with a solid construction.

Overall score

Canon EFS 55-
70
Sigma 17-
85

Specifications

SpecCanon EFS 55-Sigma 17-
BrandCanonSigma
Max ApertureF4-5.6F1.8
Image StabilizationYesNo
CompatibilityCanon APS-CSony E-mount
Focus TypeDC MotorManual

Dimension comparison

Canon EFS 55-Sigma 17-

Overview of the Canon EFS 55-250mm and Sigma 17-40mm

The Canon EFS 55-250mm is priced at $317.59, while the Sigma 17-40mm has a significantly higher price tag of $919.00. This difference of about 189% makes the Canon a more budget-friendly option for photographers looking for a versatile telephoto lens. Both lenses are designed for different photography needs, appealing to distinct segments of the market.

The Canon lens is designed for Canon’s APS-C digital SLR cameras and offers a zoom range ideal for general-purpose telephoto photography. In contrast, the Sigma lens, designed for Sony E-mount APS-C cameras, excels in low-light conditions and offers a constant aperture of F1.8, making it suitable for creative depth effects and portrait photography.

Design and Build Quality

The Canon EFS 55-250mm is a compact and lightweight telephoto zoom lens, enhancing its portability for photographers on the go. Its design includes 12 elements in 10 groups, which contribute to its optical performance. The Sigma 17-40mm, part of the Art series, emphasizes high-quality optics and is built to deliver sharp detail and professional image quality.

While the Canon lens focuses on practicality with a gear-driven focus adjustment, the Sigma’s construction is tailored for those who prioritize artistic expression in their work. Photographers might appreciate the solid build of the Sigma, but the Canon's lighter weight could make it more appealing for travel and casual shooting.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The Sigma 17-40mm boasts a constant aperture of F1.8, making it an exceptional choice for low-light photography. This feature allows photographers to capture images with reduced noise and better clarity in darker environments. The Canon EFS 55-250mm, with a maximum aperture range of F4-5.6, does not perform as well in low-light conditions but is more versatile for various lighting scenarios within its zoom range.

For photographers frequently shooting in dim settings or wanting to achieve a creative depth of field, the Sigma lens provides a significant advantage. However, those who primarily shoot in well-lit conditions may find the Canon lens meets their needs effectively.

Zoom Range and Versatility

The Canon EFS 55-250mm offers a focal length of 55-250mm, which translates to an equivalent of 88-400mm in 35mm format. This extensive zoom range provides excellent versatility for capturing distant subjects, making it ideal for wildlife or sports photography. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm has a much shorter zoom range, making it better suited for landscapes and portraits.

Photographers looking for a lens that can adapt to various shooting situations may prefer the Canon for its longer reach. However, those focusing on wide-angle shots or creative portraits may lean towards the Sigma for its wider aperture and Art-series optics.

Image Stabilization Technologies

The Canon EFS 55-250mm incorporates Canon's 4-stop compensation Image Stabilizer technology, allowing users to shoot at slower shutter speeds without introducing blur. This feature is particularly useful for handheld photography at longer focal lengths. The Sigma 17-40mm does not mention any image stabilization technology, which could impact performance in low-light situations or when shooting at slower shutter speeds.

For photographers who value stability in their images, the Canon lens provides a clear advantage. The absence of stabilization in the Sigma may pose challenges for users in certain shooting conditions, particularly if they are not using a tripod.

Target Audience and Use Cases

The Canon EFS 55-250mm is designed for Canon digital SLR users who seek an affordable and versatile telephoto lens. Its specifications make it particularly appealing for casual photographers and those interested in wildlife or sports photography. On the other hand, the Sigma 17-40mm, with its professional-grade optics and wide aperture, targets enthusiasts and professionals who prioritize image quality and low-light performance.

The distinct target audiences for these lenses highlight their unique strengths. The Canon lens serves as a reliable workhorse for everyday use, while the Sigma lens caters to those aiming for artistic and high-quality results in their photography.

Compatibility and Mounting Options

The Canon EFS 55-250mm is compatible with Canon’s APS-C size sensors, ensuring it works seamlessly with a range of EOS digital SLR cameras. The Sigma 17-40mm, designed for Sony E-mount APS-C cameras, makes it an excellent choice for users of Sony's mirrorless system.

Understanding the compatibility of these lenses is crucial for potential buyers. Users must consider their camera system before making a purchase, as each lens is tailored to specific mounts.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EFS 55-250mm and the Sigma 17-40mm ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. The Canon lens, priced at $317.59, is about 189% cheaper than the Sigma lens at $919.00, making it the more economical choice for those seeking a versatile telephoto option. However, if low-light performance and artistic quality are higher priorities, the Sigma’s F1.8 aperture and Art-series build may justify the investment.

For casual photographers or those who primarily shoot in well-lit conditions, the Canon EFS 55-250mm is a reliable and cost-effective choice. Conversely, for professional photographers or serious enthusiasts who require superior optics and low-light capabilities, the Sigma 17-40mm may be the better option. Ultimately, the decision hinges on your specific requirements and how you intend to use the lens.