Canon PIXMA TR4720 All-in-One Wireless vs Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color
Updated April 2026 — Canon PIXMA TR4720 All-in-One Wireless wins on upfront cost and features, Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color wins on ink efficiency and long-term value.
$69.00Canon PIXMA TR4720 All-in-One Wireless Printer, Home Use with Auto Document Feeder, Mobile Printing and Built-in Fax, Black
Canon
$159.00Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color All-in-One Cartridge-Free Supertank Printer with Scan and Copy – Easy, Everyday Home Printing, Black
Epson
The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 wins for long-term value due to its cartridge-free system yielding up to 4,500 black pages, despite a higher upfront cost. The Canon PIXMA TR4720 is the better choice for budget-conscious buyers needing fax capabilities and lower initial investment at $69.00.
Why Canon PIXMA TR4720 All-in-One Wireless is better
Lower upfront purchase price
Priced at $69.00 compared to $159.00
Includes Fax functionality
Offers 4-in-1 capabilities including Fax
Documented power usage
Consumes 7W during operation
Why Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color is better
High ink yield capacity
Prints up to 4,500 pages black per set
Significant ink cost savings
Save up to 90% vs ink cartridges
Extended ink supply included
Includes up to 2 years of ink in the box
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon PIXMA TR4720 All-in-One Wireless | Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $69.00 | $159.00 |
| Functions | 4-in-1 (Print, Copy, Scan, Fax) | Print, Copy, Scan |
| Print Speed | 8.8 / 4.4 ipm | — |
| Ink Yield | — | 4,500 black / 7,500 color pages |
| Connectivity | Wireless | Wired and Wireless |
| Power Consumption | 7W (0.8W Standby) | — |
| Duplex Printing | Auto 2-sided | — |
| Included Ink | — | Up to 2 years |
Dimension comparison
Overview and Core Functions
The Canon PIXMA TR4720 and Epson EcoTank ET-2400 represent two distinct approaches to home and office printing. The Canon model positions itself as an affordable all-in-one solution, integrating printing, copying, scanning, and faxing into a single compact unit. It is designed for users who need versatile functionality without a significant initial investment. In contrast, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 focuses on long-term operational efficiency. It eliminates traditional cartridges in favor of a supertank system, aiming to reduce waste and recurring costs. While the Canon offers a broader range of immediate functions including fax, the Epson prioritizes high-volume printing capabilities with its innovative ink delivery system.
Design and Build Quality
Both printers are designed to fit within standard office spaces or home desks. The Canon PIXMA TR4720 features a design centered on easy ink cartridge installation and replacement, ensuring that maintenance tasks are straightforward for the user. It supports borderless prints up to 8.5 inches by 11 inches, catering to photo printing needs alongside standard documents. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 utilizes a rear-feed input tray, which helps maintain a smaller footprint when not in use. Both units are built to handle standard paper sizes, though the Epson emphasizes reducing cartridge waste ending up in landfills through its cartridge-free architecture. Build quality for both reflects their consumer-grade positioning, with plastic housings typical of this price segment.
Print Speed and Performance
Performance metrics vary between the two models based on the data provided. The Canon PIXMA TR4720 specifies print speeds of 8.8 ipm for black and 4.4 ipm for color. These speeds are suitable for moderate home office workloads where occasional document printing is required. The Canon also supports auto 2-sided printing, which can streamline workflow by reducing manual intervention for double-sided documents. Information regarding specific pages per minute speeds for the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 is not provided in the available data. However, the Epson is marketed for stress-free printing, suggesting reliability over raw speed metrics. Users prioritizing known speed specifications may lean toward the Canon based on the available ipm data.
Ink System and Efficiency
The most significant divergence between these printers lies in their ink systems. The Canon PIXMA TR4720 uses traditional ink cartridges. It features integration with Alexa, allowing users to receive notifications when ink is low and even place smart reorders automatically. This ensures users do not run out unexpectedly, though it relies on the recurring purchase of cartridges. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 employs cartridge-free printing where each ink bottle set is equivalent to about 80 individual ink cartridges. Epson claims this allows for dramatic savings on replacement ink, up to 90% compared to cartridges. The included ink is sufficient for up to 4,500 pages in black and 7,500 pages in color, providing up to 2 years of ink in the box. This system is designed to minimize out of ink frustrations and reduce environmental waste.
Connectivity Options
Connectivity is essential for modern wireless printing. The Canon PIXMA TR4720 offers wireless connectivity, allowing users to print from various devices without physical cables. It integrates with smart home ecosystems via Alexa for voice commands and reorder notifications. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 provides reliable connectivity with both wired and wireless options. The inclusion of wired connectivity on the Epson model offers an advantage for users who prefer a stable Ethernet connection or whose wireless networks are congested. Both models support the standard wireless printing expected in this category, but the Epson's dual connectivity options provide greater flexibility for different office network setups.
Paper Handling and Capacity
Paper capacity is identical on paper but differs in mechanism. The Canon PIXMA TR4720 features a 100-sheet capacity tray. This allows users to load a standard ream quarter without frequent refilling during moderate use. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 also features a rear-feed input tray that accepts up to 100 sheets. This rear-feed design makes it easy to stock up before a big print job while keeping the front profile clear. Both printers are capable of handling standard letter-sized documents up to 8.5 inches by 11 inches. Neither model specifies specialized media handling beyond standard paper and borderless photo prints in the provided data, making them comparable in terms of raw paper capacity.
Power Consumption and Efficiency
Energy efficiency is a documented specification for the Canon model. The Canon PIXMA TR4720 has a power consumption of 7W during operation, with 0.8W in standby mode and 0.3W when off. It is ENERGY STAR certified, indicating compliance with energy efficiency guidelines. This low power draw helps reduce electricity costs over the lifespan of the device. Power consumption specifics for the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 are not provided in the current data set. While the Epson focuses on ink efficiency, the Canon provides transparent data regarding electrical efficiency. Users concerned with standby power draw may find the Canon's specified 0.8W standby consumption reassuring.
Price and Value Conclusion
The decision between these two printers depends on whether you prioritize upfront cost or long-term savings. The Canon PIXMA TR4720 is the clear winner for initial affordability at $69.00, significantly lower than the Epson's $159.00 price tag. It also offers extra functionality like faxing and auto duplexing which are not confirmed on the Epson. However, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 offers superior long-term value through its ink system. With up to 90% savings on ink and 2 years of ink included, the higher initial cost is offset over time for high-volume users. For low-volume users, the Canon remains a viable budget option, but for those seeking to minimize cartridge waste and replacement costs, the Epson provides a more sustainable economic model.