Canon PIXMA TS3720 Wireless All-in-One vs Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color
Updated April 2026 — Canon PIXMA TS3720 Wireless All-in-One wins on upfront cost and print speed, Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color wins on ink efficiency and long-term value.
$159.00Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color All-in-One Cartridge-Free Supertank Printer with Scan and Copy – Easy, Everyday Home Printing, Black
Epson
The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 wins for long-term value due to its cartridge-free ink system offering significant savings and high page yield. The Canon PIXMA TS3720 is the better choice for buyers seeking a lower upfront cost and a built-in LCD screen for direct control.
Why Canon PIXMA TS3720 Wireless All-in-One is better
Lower Initial Investment
Priced at $86.00 compared to $159.00
Faster Document Printing
Prints 7.7 ipm in black and 4 ipm in color
On-Device Control
Includes a 1.5 inch segment LCD screen
Why Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color is better
Superior Ink Capacity
Yields up to 4,500 black and 7,500 color pages
Reduced Operating Costs
Save up to 90 percent on replacement ink versus cartridges
Larger Paper Input
Rear-feed tray accepts up to 100 sheets
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon PIXMA TS3720 Wireless All-in-One | Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront Price | $86.00 | $159.00 |
| Print Speed (Black) | 7.7 ipm | — |
| Print Speed (Color) | 4 ipm | — |
| Ink System | 2 Cartridges | Cartridge-Free Bottles |
| Ink Capacity (Black) | — | 4,500 pages |
| Ink Capacity (Color) | — | 7,500 pages |
| Paper Tray Capacity | — | 100 sheets |
| Display | 1.5 inch LCD | — |
Dimension comparison
Design and build quality
The Canon PIXMA TS3720 and Epson EcoTank ET-2400 adopt different design philosophies tailored to their respective ink systems. The Canon model focuses on compact integration, housing its components within a standard all-in-one chassis. It features a 1.5 inch segment LCD screen, which provides a physical interface for navigating menus without needing a computer. This screen adds to the build utility for users who prefer direct manipulation of settings. The Epson ET-2400 utilizes a rear-feed input tray design, which helps maintain a smaller footprint on the desk surface when not in use. Its build is oriented around the EcoTank system, which eliminates the need for internal cartridge bays, potentially allowing for a different internal layout focused on ink tank accessibility. Both units are designed for home or small office environments, prioritizing functionality over industrial ruggedness.
Printing capabilities
When evaluating raw output speed, the Canon PIXMA TS3720 provides specific metrics for user expectation management. It is capable of printing approximately 7.7 images per minute in black and 4 images per minute in color. These speeds are suitable for standard document tasks and occasional photo printing. The Canon unit supports single-sided printing only, which is standard for this price segment. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 is marketed as a wireless color printer capable of print, copy, and scan functions. While specific images per minute rates are not provided in the available data, the focus of the Epson model is on reliability and volume rather than raw speed benchmarks. Both devices support high-resolution paper and photo printing, ensuring that image quality remains a priority alongside document throughput.
Ink system and efficiency
The most significant divergence between these two printers lies in their ink delivery mechanisms. The Canon PIXMA TS3720 utilizes a traditional cartridge system, requiring 2 easy-to-replace ink cartridges to print in full color. This method is familiar to most users but typically incurs higher costs per page over time. In contrast, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 features innovative cartridge-free printing. It uses ink bottles that are equivalent to about 80 individual ink cartridges. This system is designed to dramatically reduce waste and frequency of replacement. Epson claims the included ink supply provides up to 2 years of ink in the box, reducing out-of-ink frustrations. This fundamental difference dictates the long-term ownership experience, with Epson prioritizing volume and Canon prioritizing initial simplicity.
Connectivity options
Both printers offer robust connectivity solutions for modern workflows. The Canon PIXMA TS3720 establishes a stable and reliable connection using Dual Band Wi-Fi, supporting both 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequencies. This ensures flexibility in various network environments. It also supports Easy Wireless Connect, allowing setup without a computer. Mobile device printing is handled through the free Canon PRINT app, Apple AirPrint, and Mopria Print Service, alongside Chromebook compatibility. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 provides reliable connectivity with both wired and wireless options. The inclusion of a wired option offers an alternative for users who prefer a direct physical connection for stability. Both units support wireless printing, ensuring they can integrate seamlessly into contemporary home networks without requiring direct USB tethering for daily operations.
Paper handling
Paper management differs notably between the two models. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 features a rear-feed input tray that accepts up to 100 sheets. This capacity allows users to stock up before a big print job, reducing the need for constant refilling during large tasks. The rear-feed design can also accommodate different media types more easily than some front-loading trays. The Canon PIXMA TS3720 supports versatile media, including envelopes, photos, high-resolution paper, and banners. While the specific sheet capacity is not listed in the provided data, the emphasis on versatile media support suggests it is capable of handling various project types. For users prioritizing bulk document printing, the Epson's specified 100-sheet capacity offers a clear advantage in workflow continuity.
User interface and setup
Ease of use is a critical factor for home printers. The Canon PIXMA TS3720 emphasizes easy setup, claiming users can get running in just a few minutes thanks to a streamlined process out of the box. The inclusion of the 1.5 inch LCD screen aids in this process by providing visual feedback during configuration. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 focuses on stress-free printing, aiming to reduce frustrations associated with running out of ink. Setup involves configuring the wireless or wired connection, and the cartridge-free system eliminates the need to learn cartridge installation procedures. Both manufacturers highlight the simplicity of their respective installation processes, targeting users who want minimal technical hurdles before beginning their first print job.
Price and value
Financial considerations vary significantly between upfront costs and long-term value. The Canon PIXMA TS3720 is priced at $86.00, making it an accessible entry point for budget-conscious buyers. However, the reliance on cartridges may increase total cost of ownership. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 carries a higher initial price of $159.00. Despite this, Epson claims users can save up to 90 percent with replacement ink bottles versus ink cartridges. The value proposition shifts depending on print volume; low-volume users may prefer the Canon's lower entry price, while high-volume users will likely recoup the Epson's premium through ink savings. The Epson model also highlights zero cartridge waste, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers concerned about landfill impact.
Which one should you buy?
Choosing between these printers depends on your specific printing habits and budget structure. If you prioritize a low upfront cost and want a physical screen for direct control, the Canon PIXMA TS3720 is the logical choice. It is well-suited for occasional printing tasks where the cost of cartridges is less impactful. However, if you print frequently and want to minimize maintenance and replacement costs, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 is the superior investment. Its high page yield of up to 4,500 black and 7,500 color pages, combined with significant ink savings, offers better long-term value. Ultimately, the Epson wins on efficiency and capacity, while the Canon wins on accessibility and initial price.
