Canon PIXMA TS6520 Wireless Color Inkjet Printer vs Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color All-in-One
Updated August 2026 — Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color All-in-One leads on cost efficiency and features.
The Canon PIXMA TS6520 offers affordability and user-friendly features, while the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 excels in long-term ink savings and high-volume printing.
Why Canon PIXMA TS6520 Wireless Color Inkjet Printer is better
Price
Canon is $19 cheaper than Epson
Design
Canon has a more compact design
User Experience
Canon has an intuitive control panel
Why Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color All-in-One is better
Cost Efficiency
Epson saves up to 90% on ink costs
Ink Capacity
Epson includes up to 2 years of ink
Print Volume
Epson can print up to 4,500 pages in black
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon PIXMA TS6520 Wireless Color Inkjet Printer | Epson EcoTank ET-2400 Wireless Color All-in-One |
|---|---|---|
| Print Quality | High | High |
| Duplex Printing | Yes | No |
| Scanner Type | Flatbed | Flatbed |
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Ink System | Cartridge | Supertank |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Printers
When comparing the Canon PIXMA TS6520 and the Epson EcoTank ET-2400, it’s important to consider their pricing and intended use. The Canon PIXMA TS6520 is priced at $140.00, while the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 costs $159.00, making the Canon about 11.9% cheaper. Both printers cater to home users and offer various features, but their designs and functionalities differ significantly.
Design and Build Quality
The Canon PIXMA TS6520 boasts a compact and stylish design that easily fits into any workspace. Its small footprint ensures it doesn’t take up much room, making it ideal for home offices or students. In contrast, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400, while also designed for home use, focuses more on functionality with a rear-feed input tray that accommodates up to 100 sheets. This design allows for smoother print jobs, especially when working on larger projects, but it may not have the same sleek aesthetic appeal as the Canon.
Printing Capabilities
Both printers excel in their printing capabilities, though their approaches differ. The Canon PIXMA TS6520 features a 2-cartridge hybrid ink system that delivers impressive print quality for both documents and photos, ensuring vibrant colors and sharp text. It also offers automatic duplex printing to save paper. On the other hand, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 uses a cartridge-free system that allows users to refill ink tanks, offering the equivalent of about 80 individual ink cartridges. This innovative approach emphasizes cost efficiency and convenience, as it significantly reduces the need for frequent ink replacements.
Scanning and Copying Features
When it comes to scanning and copying, the Canon PIXMA TS6520 integrates these functions seamlessly into its design. It provides an efficient scanner that can handle everyday tasks with ease, making it a suitable choice for families and students. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 also includes scanning and copying capabilities, but it emphasizes its high-resolution flatbed scanner, which further enhances its versatility for essential home printing tasks. Both models cater to basic copying and scanning needs, but the Canon may be more user-friendly for those who prioritize ease of use.
Connectivity Options
Connectivity is another critical factor to consider. The Canon PIXMA TS6520 offers reliable dual-band Wi-Fi (2.4GHz or 5GHz), ensuring smooth printing from various devices throughout your home. Users can also take advantage of mobile printing options through the Canon PRINT App, Apple AirPrint, and Mopria Print Service. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 matches this versatility with both wired and wireless connectivity, allowing for a more flexible setup. This gives users the freedom to choose how they connect their devices, enhancing the overall printing experience.
Cost of Ownership
The cost of ownership is a significant differentiator between these two printers. The Canon PIXMA TS6520, priced at $140.00, presents a lower initial investment. However, its ink cartridges may lead to higher long-term costs. In contrast, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400, although slightly more expensive upfront at $159.00, can save users up to 90% on replacement ink, equating to the ability to print up to 4,500 pages in black and 7,500 pages in color. This cartridge-free system effectively reduces overall printing costs, making it a more economical choice for users with higher print volumes.
User Experience
User experience varies significantly between the two models. The Canon PIXMA TS6520 is designed for ease of use with its intuitive control panel and 1.42” OLED display, allowing users to monitor ink levels and printer status effortlessly. Its straightforward setup process is another advantage for those who may not be tech-savvy. Conversely, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 also aims to provide a stress-free experience but focuses on the convenience of its refillable ink tanks. Users can enjoy up to two years of ink in the box, which minimizes the frustration of running out of ink unexpectedly.
Customer Feedback and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the Canon PIXMA TS6520 holds a bestseller rank of 397, indicating a solid customer preference. Users appreciate its affordability and quality, especially for everyday printing tasks. The Epson EcoTank ET-2400 has a slightly lower sales rank of 817, but it garners positive feedback for its innovative cartridge-free system and long-term savings on ink costs. Both products have their dedicated user bases, but the Canon appears to be favored for its overall value in home printing.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon PIXMA TS6520 and the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize affordability and user-friendly features for occasional printing, the Canon PIXMA TS6520 is an excellent option. However, if you require a high-volume printing solution with significant long-term savings on ink, the Epson EcoTank ET-2400 is worth the investment. Both printers offer unique advantages, making them suitable for different types of users. Consider your printing habits and budget to make the best choice for your home or office.

