Canon PIXMA TS6520 Wireless Color Inkjet Printer vs Epson EcoTank ET-4800 Wireless All-in-One
Updated August 2026 — Canon PIXMA TS6520 Wireless Color Inkjet Printer wins on ease of use and design, Epson EcoTank ET-4800 Wireless All-in-One wins on cost efficiency and features.
The Canon PIXMA TS6520 is a budget-friendly option for basic printing needs, while the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 offers long-term savings and additional features for home office use.
Why Canon PIXMA TS6520 Wireless Color Inkjet Printer is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $140.00.
Compact Design
Canon has a smaller footprint, making it easier to fit in tight spaces.
Ease of Use
Canon has a straightforward setup process.
Why Epson EcoTank ET-4800 Wireless All-in-One is better
Functionality
Epson includes an auto document feeder and fax capabilities.
Cost of Ownership
Epson's cartridge-free design leads to lower long-term ink costs.
Environmental Impact
Epson produces zero cartridge waste.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon PIXMA TS6520 Wireless Color Inkjet Printer | Epson EcoTank ET-4800 Wireless All-in-One |
|---|---|---|
| Print Speed | 15 ppm | 10 ppm |
| Scanner Type | Flatbed | Flatbed |
| Duplex Printing | Yes | Yes |
| ADF | No | Yes |
| Mobile Printing | Yes | Yes |
| Ink System | 2-cartridge | Cartridge-free |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When comparing the Canon PIXMA TS6520 Wireless Color Inkjet Printer and the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 Wireless All-in-One Cartridge-Free Supertank Printer, the most significant difference is their pricing and functionality. The Canon is priced at $140.00, while the Epson is at $299.99, making the Canon about 53% cheaper. However, the Epson offers a cartridge-free solution with high-capacity ink tanks, which can lead to long-term savings on ink costs.
Print Quality
Print quality is a vital factor for any printer, and both the Canon PIXMA TS6520 and the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 deliver impressive results in their own right. The Canon's 2-cartridge hybrid ink system ensures sharp text and vivid colors, making it suitable for both documents and photos. Meanwhile, the Epson employs Micro Piezo Heat-Free Technology, which produces sharp text and impressive color graphics on various paper types. Although both printers excel in print quality, the specific technologies and ink systems they use differ, catering to different printing needs.
Functionality
Functionality sets these two printers apart significantly. The Canon PIXMA TS6520 offers versatile capabilities, including printing, scanning, and copying, all in a compact design. It's user-friendly with a 1.42” OLED display and includes automatic duplex printing to save paper. On the other hand, the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 adds more features, such as an auto document feeder, fax capabilities, and a color display for easier navigation. While the Canon is great for basic tasks, the Epson is better suited for those who require additional functionalities for a home office setup.
Cost of Ownership
The cost of ownership is a crucial consideration when purchasing a printer. The Canon PIXMA TS6520 has a current price of $140.00, but its average price over the last 30 days is about $83.59. In contrast, the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 is priced at $299.99, with an average price of $228.01 over the same period. While the upfront cost of the Epson is significantly higher, its cartridge-free design can lead to lower ongoing ink costs and less waste over time. If you're looking at long-term savings, the Epson may ultimately be more economical.
Ease of Use
When it comes to ease of use, the Canon PIXMA TS6520 stands out for its straightforward setup process and intuitive controls. Users can easily connect via dual-band Wi-Fi and utilize mobile printing with services like Apple AirPrint and the Canon PRINT App. The 1.42” OLED display offers quick access to printer status and settings. Meanwhile, the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 is designed to be user-friendly as well, featuring a high-resolution flatbed scanner and a color display. However, its added features might require a slightly steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with multifunction devices.
Environmental Impact
The environmental impact of printers is gaining more attention, and here is where the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 has a clear advantage. It boasts zero cartridge waste by utilizing high-capacity, refillable ink tanks, which significantly reduces the amount of waste generated. In contrast, the Canon PIXMA TS6520 relies on traditional ink cartridges, which contribute to environmental concerns regarding disposal. If sustainability is a priority, the Epson’s cartridge-free solution aligns better with eco-friendly practices.
Wireless Connectivity
Both printers offer reliable wireless connectivity, but there are differences in their capabilities. The Canon PIXMA TS6520 features dual-band Wi-Fi (2.4GHz and 5GHz) for stable and consistent connections, allowing for smooth printing from different locations within your home or office. The Epson EcoTank ET-4800 also supports wireless printing, but it requires an Internet connection for most features, which may limit its usability in certain scenarios. Depending on your wireless setup, one may offer a more seamless experience than the other.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, your choice between the Canon PIXMA TS6520 and the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 hinges on your specific printing needs and budget. The Canon is a fantastic option for those who want an affordable, user-friendly printer for basic tasks, particularly at a price point of $140.00. However, if you're looking for a multifunctional printer with long-term savings on ink and a focus on sustainability, the Epson, despite its higher initial cost of $299.99, may be the better investment. Consider your printing habits, workspace, and environmental concerns before making a decision.

