vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on focal length and max aperture, Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on price.

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens offers greater versatility and a lower price, making it the better choice for general photography. However, the RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens excels in macro capabilities.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Price

RF 24-105mm is $476.95, cheaper than RF35mm at $499.00

Versatility

RF 24-105mm covers wide-angle to short-telephoto

Zoom Range

RF 24-105mm has a flexible zoom range

Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better

Macro Capability

RF35mm offers 0.5x magnification for close-ups

Minimum Focus

RF35mm has a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 ft

Prime Quality

RF35mm provides superior optical performance for portraits

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
88
Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
82

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
Image StabilizationYesYes
Autofocus TypeSTMSTM
Control RingYesYes
Minimum Focus1.5 ft0.56 ft
Build QualityHighHigh

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is priced at $476.95, making it about 4.4% cheaper than the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, which retails for $499.00. This versatile standard zoom lens is designed for everyday photography and travel, featuring a focal length range that allows for wide-angle to short-telephoto shots. Its compact design makes it easy to carry, and it is suitable for both photography and casual video recording. The lens includes a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer, which provides up to five stops of correction for camera shake, enhancing image sharpness and video stability.

Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens offers an impressive macro capability with a 0.5x magnification ratio, priced at $499.00. This lens is ideal for those who want a high-quality prime lens with the versatility to capture wide-angle shots while also excelling in close-up photography. With a minimum focusing distance of just 0.56 feet, it allows photographers to get incredibly close to their subjects. The lens also features Optical Image Stabilization, ensuring steady shots even in low light, making it a great choice for both macro and general photography.

Image Stabilization Features

Both lenses come equipped with Optical Image Stabilization, which is a critical feature for reducing blur caused by camera shake. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens offers stabilization that provides up to five stops of correction, making it especially beneficial for handheld shooting in low-light situations or at longer focal lengths. Similarly, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens also features stabilization at up to five stops, ensuring that users can capture sharp images without the need for a tripod. Thus, both lenses excel in image stabilization, making them suitable for various shooting conditions.

Autofocus and Performance

The autofocus performance is another area where these lenses shine. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens utilizes an STM stepping motor that delivers smooth, quiet, and precise autofocus, making it ideal for both still photography and video recording. The lens allows for full-time manual focus override, facilitating fine adjustments when needed. The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens also features a fast and accurate autofocus system, complemented by its unique design that caters to macro photography. Both lenses promise reliable autofocus, but the versatility of the RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 makes it suitable for a wider range of scenarios.

Versatility and Use Cases

When it comes to versatility, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens stands out with its broader focal range. Covering everything from wide-angle to short-telephoto perspectives, it is particularly well-suited for travel, street photography, and casual video work. The lens's flexible zoom range allows creators to switch seamlessly between landscapes, portraits, and close-up shots. In contrast, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, while excellent for macro photography, has a more limited focal length that is better suited for specific types of shots rather than general versatility. Thus, for all-around use, the RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is the more adaptable choice.

Design and Portability

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it comfortable for extended shooting sessions. This design is ideal for photographers on the go, especially when traveling. On the other hand, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens is also compact but focuses more on specialized macro photography. While both lenses are portable, the RF 24-105mm offers a broader range of applications due to its zoom capability and versatility in various shooting environments.

Price Comparison

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is available for $476.95, which is about 4.4% less than the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens at $499.00. This price difference may be a consideration for budget-conscious photographers looking for a versatile lens for everyday use. However, those specifically interested in macro photography might find the additional cost of the RF35mm justifiable given its unique features and capabilities.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you require a versatile lens that can handle a variety of situations—from landscapes to portraits and video—then the RF 24-105mm is the superior option due to its flexible zoom range and compact design. However, if macro photography is your primary focus and you want the ability to capture fine details with excellent optical performance, then the RF35mm may be worth the extra investment. Both lenses offer great features, but their applications differ significantly, catering to distinct types of photography enthusiasts.