vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on zoom range and stabilization, Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- wins on weight and size.

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers superior versatility and performance, while the Nikon lens is a budget-friendly option for telephoto needs.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Versatility

Canon covers wide-angle to short telephoto.

Image Stabilization

Canon provides up to five stops of correction.

Autofocus

Canon has a smoother STM motor for video.

Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- is better

Price

Nikon is significantly cheaper.

Telephoto Range

Nikon offers a longer focal length.

Weight

Nikon is slightly lighter.

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-
72

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-
Focal Length24-105mm55-300mm
Aperturef/4-7.1f/4.5-5.6
Image StabilizationYesYes
Autofocus TypeSTMSWM
Macro CapabilityYesNo

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is priced at $476.95, making it a versatile option for photographers looking for a standard zoom lens. This lens is designed for full-frame Canon RF-mount mirrorless cameras and offers a flexible zoom range ideal for various photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. The built-in Optical Image Stabilizer enhances shooting capabilities in low-light conditions, allowing for sharp images while reducing camera shake. Additionally, the lens features a smooth STM autofocus motor, making it suitable for both still photography and video recording.

Overview of the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED Lens

The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED Vibration Reduction Zoom Lens is available at a lower price of $254.00, appealing to those seeking a more budget-friendly option. This lens is designed for Nikon DSLR cameras and offers a 5.5x telephoto zoom, perfect for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife or sports events. Its VR II Image Stabilization allows for stable handheld shooting, even at slower shutter speeds, which is especially beneficial for capturing clear, sharp images in various conditions. The lens also features a Silent Wave Motor for quick, quiet autofocus.

Image Quality Comparison

When it comes to image quality, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens excels with its integrated Optical Image Stabilizer, which provides up to five stops of correction. This feature significantly improves sharpness for stills and video alike, particularly in low-light situations. The lens also has a rounded seven-blade diaphragm that contributes to aesthetically pleasing background blur. In contrast, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm lens employs its VR II stabilization to allow for handheld shooting at up to four shutter speeds slower than normal, ensuring that images remain sharp even when shooting at longer focal lengths. Both lenses deliver exceptional quality, but the Canon lens offers a broader range of versatility due to its focal length coverage.

Autofocus Performance

The autofocus performance of both lenses is designed to meet the needs of photographers and videographers. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens utilizes a smooth STM stepping motor, which provides quiet and precise autofocus, ideal for video recording where noise can be distracting. It also features full-time manual focus override, allowing for fine adjustments during shooting. On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR lens features a Silent Wave Motor that ensures fast and accurate autofocus, with the added benefit of Tripod Detection Mode to minimize vibration during tripod use. While both lenses offer excellent autofocus capabilities, the Canon lens may be more appealing for those focused on video work.

Size and Portability

In terms of size and portability, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it ideal for travel and everyday use. Its versatility allows photographers to easily transition between different styles without the need to change lenses frequently. The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm lens, while also portable, is slightly bulkier due to its telephoto design. This difference may affect the ease of carrying the Nikon lens for extended periods, especially on travel outings. For photographers prioritizing lightweight gear, the Canon lens stands out.

Versatility for Different Photography Styles

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is built for versatility, covering a range of focal lengths from wide-angle to short telephoto. This makes it suitable for various photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and casual video work. Its Center Macro Focus position allows for close-up shooting, enhancing its usability for detailed subjects. In contrast, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR lens, with its longer focal range, excels in capturing distant subjects and is particularly effective for sports or wildlife photography. While both lenses cater to different styles, the Canon lens offers broader applicability for everyday photographers.

Additional Features

Both lenses come with unique additional features that enhance their usability. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens includes a configurable Control Ring for intuitive access to exposure settings, such as ISO and aperture, which is beneficial for quickly adapting to changing shooting conditions. The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR lens includes high refractive index elements and extra-low dispersion elements, effectively minimizing chromatic aberration and ensuring high contrast in images. While the features differ, both lenses provide valuable enhancements that suit their respective designs and intended use cases.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED Lens ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. The Canon lens, priced at $476.95, offers a versatile focal range, superior optical stabilization, and excellent autofocus performance, making it ideal for a variety of photographic situations, especially for those who shoot both stills and video. On the other hand, the Nikon lens is more budget-friendly at $254.00, providing excellent telephoto capabilities and solid image stabilization, perfect for capturing distant subjects. If versatility and video performance are your priorities, the Canon lens is the way to go; however, for budget-conscious photographers focusing on telephoto needs, the Nikon lens is an excellent choice.