vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 18-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on max aperture and build quality, Tamron 18- wins on zoom ratio and weight.

The Canon RF 24-105mm offers excellent value and versatility for Canon users, while the Tamron 18-300mm provides an extensive zoom range for Sony APS-C users. Overall, the Canon lens is the better choice for its price and features.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Price

Canon is $122 cheaper

Weight

Canon is lighter and more compact

Image Stabilization

Canon offers built-in stabilization

Why Tamron 18- is better

Zoom Range

Tamron has a 16.6x zoom ratio

Autofocus Speed

Tamron features VXD for faster focus

Durability

Tamron has moisture-resistant construction

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
Tamron 18-
78

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Tamron 18-
Focal Length24-105mm18-300mm
Aperturef/4-7.1f/3.5-6.3
Image StabilizationYesYes
AutofocusSTMVXD
Macro Capability1:21:2

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Tamron 18-

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm and Tamron 18-300mm

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens is priced at $476.95, while the Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Lens costs $599.00, making the Canon about 20% cheaper. Both lenses offer a range of features appealing to photographers looking for versatility, but they cater to different needs and camera systems. The Canon lens is designed for full-frame Canon RF-mount mirrorless cameras, whereas the Tamron lens is specifically for Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras.

Optical Performance

The Canon RF 24-105mm provides a versatile focal length range, covering wide-angle to short-telephoto perspectives, ideal for everyday photography and travel. It features a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that offers up to five stops of correction, which is beneficial for reducing camera shake when shooting handheld. In comparison, the Tamron 18-300mm boasts a remarkable 16.6x zoom ratio, covering a focal length range equivalent to 27mm to 450mm in full-frame terms. This allows for both wide-angle and ultra-telephoto shots, enhancing its versatility for various shooting scenarios. The Tamron lens maintains high image quality thanks to its special optical elements, ensuring sharpness from the center to the edges.

Autofocus Capabilities

Both lenses employ advanced autofocus systems to enhance user experience. The Canon RF 24-105mm utilizes a smooth and quiet STM (Stepping Motor) for autofocus, making it well-suited for both photography and video recording. This allows for natural focus transitions, which is particularly important for vloggers and content creators. On the other hand, the Tamron 18-300mm features a VXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive) linear motor autofocus mechanism, which provides fast and precise focusing. This capability is essential for maintaining high resolving power throughout its zoom range, particularly when capturing dynamic or fast-moving subjects.

Build Quality and Design

The Canon RF 24-105mm is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it an excellent choice for travel and everyday carry. It includes a dedicated Center Macro Focus position, allowing for close-up shots with a maximum magnification of 1:2. The lens also incorporates a configurable Control Ring for quick adjustments to exposure settings. In comparison, the Tamron 18-300mm is similarly portable, measuring 4.9 x 2.9 inches and weighing just 21.9 ounces. It features moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, making it well-suited for outdoor photography in various conditions. This durability adds to the Tamron's appeal as an all-in-one lens for diverse shooting environments.

Versatility in Photography

When it comes to versatility, the Canon RF 24-105mm excels in its ability to transition seamlessly between landscapes, portraits, and casual video work. Its flexible zoom range makes it an ideal choice for photographers who want a single lens for multiple scenarios. The lens’s built-in image stabilization further enhances its usability in low-light conditions. The Tamron 18-300mm, however, takes versatility to another level with its extensive zoom range, allowing photographers to capture everything from wide-angle landscapes to distant wildlife without changing lenses. This makes it particularly useful for travel and everyday snapshots, where convenience is key.

Additional Features

The Canon RF 24-105mm includes a 64GB memory card and a camera bag as part of its bundle, adding value for users looking for a complete package. It also boasts a rounded seven-blade diaphragm, which contributes to pleasant background blur, enhancing portrait photography. Meanwhile, the Tamron 18-300mm includes features like a minimum object distance of 5.9 inches at 18mm and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2, making it capable of detailed close-up photography. This versatility, combined with its all-in-one design, makes it an exciting option for photographers seeking to explore various styles without the hassle of switching lenses.

Price Considerations

The Canon RF 24-105mm is priced at $476.95, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to the Tamron 18-300mm, which is priced at $599.00. This roughly $122 price difference (about 20%) may be a significant factor for many photographers, especially those who are just starting or those on a tighter budget. While both lenses offer excellent performance and unique features, the cost may influence the decision for those who are looking for the best value in their investment.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm and the Tamron 18-300mm largely depends on your specific needs and shooting preferences. If you are a Canon user seeking a compact, versatile lens for everyday photography and video, the Canon RF 24-105mm is a solid choice, especially given its lower price point. However, if you own a Sony APS-C mirrorless camera and desire the flexibility of a wide-ranging zoom lens that covers both wide-angle and telephoto perspectives, the Tamron 18-300mm is an outstanding option. Ultimately, both lenses offer unique advantages that cater to different types of photographers, making either a worthy investment depending on your camera system and photographic goals.